bozz_2006
14 years ago
Hindsight is 20/20. It's easy to be critical of a play that didn't work. Not so easy to call plays that always do work.
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

Buncha playcallin' experts on these boards. Interesting, seeing as no one here spends 80 hours a week designing and implementing game plans.

Honestly, the level of depth that goes into offensive and defensive schemes is ASTOUNDING.

And thus SIMPLY it is almost impossible to be legitimately critical of playcalling. One simply does not possess the requisite mastery of concepts, nor is one capable to confer the success or lack of success of a playcall because the of the multitude of variables.

I don't claim any brilliance, but conversations like the one Greg C started about this topic indicate that there's usually more to a play than what immediately catches the eye.

How can someone be critical of something they don't understand? Seriously? Riddle me that -- I'll bake you a cake, a cookie, whatever you prefer. I'll wash your car. I'll get a tramp stamp. I'll take a "Croc Shot" and send it to my employers.

Even if you were the star receiver on your high school team, or you played guard at the junior-college level, or if you play a lot of Madden (like I used to), or if you're just a MMQB or keyboard warrior -- you're probably not qualified to critique playcalling at the level appropriate to be considered legitimate.

"Greg C." wrote:



I mostly agree with you on this, but I do think there is some room for fans to be critical. The reason is that although coaches know a lot more about playcalling than any of us do, they are human and they are prone to making human mistakes--overanalyzing, being too cautious, getting into ruts, that sort of thing. The problem is that it is usually difficult for fans to determine whether coaches are really making those mistakes or whether they are calling the right plays based on information that we are not aware of, and the plays just are not working for one reason or another.

But there are patterns that emerge after awhile. For example, I have no faith in Marty Schottenheimer's playcalling in clutch situations, having watched his teams choke in the playoffs for years. Some people feel that way about Mike McCarthy. There have been times when I've wanted McCarthy to close out games more aggressively than he has, but I don't see it as a major concern. Most NFL coaches are more conservative than fans in those situations.

"evad04" wrote:


Bingo. It is very difficult to know the intentions and full context of what goes into a decision. This difficulty is conveniently sidestepped by most fans, though, and the issue to me isn't the small amount of space made for criticism but rather the vast expanse of amateurish know-it-all-ness.

Now, in the case of Schottenheimer the whole "Martyball" thing is pretty well-known. He often got extremely conservative at the most crucial moments. This tendency, you could argue, came mostly from his expertise as a defensive minded coach (a common misnomer). That said, his overall blueprint was hugely successful.

In McCarthy's case there are isolated incidents of similar conservatism but on the whole they are mostly incomparable to Marty. McCarthy's scheme itself is on a totally different evolved plane. How many times do we credit the scheme for its aggressiveness or ability to create mismatches? We don't. Most fans take the position that Green Bay's talent overcomes McCarthy's ineptitude. It is ludicrous to me, and I imagine that sentiment would be equally-not-more-ridiculous to NFL scouts and former-and-current head coaches who praise him.

There's an extent to which being critical of playcalling is a bedrock of experiencing football. I participate the same way -- I'm guilty of the very thing I'm arguing against. The point here is just to know that my criticisms can only hold so much weight -- very little.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Really guys why do you think Mike McCarthy is a bad coach?He turned Aaron Rodgers into what he is today,He is a good offensive minded coach.Lets not forget he hired Capers and Kevin Greene only one thats suspect is slocum.His record as a coach is 42-29 not to shaby.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I guess every team that doesn't win a Super Bowl should fire their coach immediately.

31 coaches last year should have been fired.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
yooperfan
14 years ago
TT has job security in Green Bay for as long as he wants to stay and he and MM are joined at the waist so MM does as well.
Under Ted Thompson the Packers will have a winning record most years and will win a division championship periodically, even make the playoffs now and again.
The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

Building through the draft is an admiral plan but every once in a while the dice have to be rolled or that's all that is ever done is building for the future.
At some point the future is now.

Sorry for my interruption, let the Ted Thompson lovefest continue.
yooperfan
14 years ago
Oh yeah, no matter what, every home game will be sold out for years to come.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Yooper - I can almost guarantee you that upper management is aware we have a significant injury problem this year and they've been on the phone with other teams.

This year has been our strongest chance to win it all since 2007. They know this.

Now what we need are other teams that are desperate enough to do something stupid so we can take advantage of it. Our biggest priority right now shouldn't have been going after M. Lynch, but replacing our SS. If Nick Barnett is out for the year as well, we'll need a MLB as well.

Just like picking up babes, if you appear desperate, you will be exploited.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

Ted Thompson has job security in Green Bay for as long as he wants to stay and he and Mike McCarthy are joined at the waist so Mike McCarthy does as well.
Under Ted Thompson the Packers will have a winning record most years and will win a division championship periodically, even make the playoffs now and again.
The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

Building through the draft is an admiral plan but every once in a while the dice have to be rolled or that's all that is ever done is building for the future.
At some point the future is now.

Sorry for my interruption, let the Ted Thompson lovefest continue.

"yooperfan" wrote:



I agree mostly, but in the end, FA or not, I look, did Ted supply players to win a SB. If mccarthy messes with those players, that is on McCarthy. Biggest Gripe I will have with Ted after this season, win or lose is not canning Mccarthy.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
yooperfan
14 years ago

Yooper - I can almost guarantee you that upper management is aware we have a significant injury problem this year and they've been on the phone with other teams.

This year has been our strongest chance to win it all since 2007. They know this.

Now what we need are other teams that are desperate enough to do something stupid so we can take advantage of it. Our biggest priority right now shouldn't have been going after M. Lynch, but replacing our SS. If Nick Barnett is out for the year as well, we'll need a MLB as well.

Just like picking up babes, if you appear desperate, you will be exploited.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Slayer you are one of my favorite contributors, but I SO disagree with you on your stance on the running game.

If Ted Thompson is not on the phone, I'd be more disappointed in him than I have been since he was hired. We are getting to the point of being desperate with all the injuries and no running game.
But then I don't know about desperation because I have had the good fortune of never having been desperate.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
MM's best season when it came to playcalling was 2007. Loved his playcalling that year.

He's also one heck of a developer for QBs. He salvaged Favre's career and helped build Rodgers into an elite QB.

I am against canning him. But I do think there are parts of his game that could be improved. My biggest beef with MM is that he needs to go for the throat when the opponent is on the ropes.

In his defense, he tried that against the Lions and the pass got picked off. but like a few others have said, I believe in living and dying by aggression. What I hate is when we go soft. I like pounding your opponents like Belichick does. Or last year when the Vikings beat the Cows, the game was already over and Favre threw his 4th TD. Got the Cows so pissed off that one of the Cows ran onto the field and had some unkind words directed at the Vikings.

I love that. Shoot 'em in the head when he's down to make sure he's dead. I wish MM would do that.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
zombieslayer
14 years ago



Slayer you are one of my favorite contributors, but I SO disagree with you on your stance on the running game.

If Ted Thompson is not on the phone, I'd be more disappointed in him than I have been since he was hired. We are getting to the point of being desperate with all the injuries and no running game.
But then I don't know about desperation because I have had the good fortune of never having been desperate.

"yooperfan" wrote:



Yooper - Ted dropped the ball with Lynch. Had I known that that was all it would take to get Lynch, we should have signed the papers. Lynch is dang good in screens. I saw him at UC Berkeley.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (44m) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (45m) : Agree
dfosterf (1h) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (1h) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (1h) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (6h) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (8h) : Great point Martha
beast (8h) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (10h) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (11h) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (11h) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (12h) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (15h) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (15h) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (15h) : 4rd
dfosterf (15h) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (15h) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (15h) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (15h) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (17h) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (17h) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (17h) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (17h) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (18h) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (19h) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (21h) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (21h) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.