bozz_2006
14 years ago
Hindsight is 20/20. It's easy to be critical of a play that didn't work. Not so easy to call plays that always do work.
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

Buncha playcallin' experts on these boards. Interesting, seeing as no one here spends 80 hours a week designing and implementing game plans.

Honestly, the level of depth that goes into offensive and defensive schemes is ASTOUNDING.

And thus SIMPLY it is almost impossible to be legitimately critical of playcalling. One simply does not possess the requisite mastery of concepts, nor is one capable to confer the success or lack of success of a playcall because the of the multitude of variables.

I don't claim any brilliance, but conversations like the one Greg C started about this topic indicate that there's usually more to a play than what immediately catches the eye.

How can someone be critical of something they don't understand? Seriously? Riddle me that -- I'll bake you a cake, a cookie, whatever you prefer. I'll wash your car. I'll get a tramp stamp. I'll take a "Croc Shot" and send it to my employers.

Even if you were the star receiver on your high school team, or you played guard at the junior-college level, or if you play a lot of Madden (like I used to), or if you're just a MMQB or keyboard warrior -- you're probably not qualified to critique playcalling at the level appropriate to be considered legitimate.

"Greg C." wrote:



I mostly agree with you on this, but I do think there is some room for fans to be critical. The reason is that although coaches know a lot more about playcalling than any of us do, they are human and they are prone to making human mistakes--overanalyzing, being too cautious, getting into ruts, that sort of thing. The problem is that it is usually difficult for fans to determine whether coaches are really making those mistakes or whether they are calling the right plays based on information that we are not aware of, and the plays just are not working for one reason or another.

But there are patterns that emerge after awhile. For example, I have no faith in Marty Schottenheimer's playcalling in clutch situations, having watched his teams choke in the playoffs for years. Some people feel that way about Mike McCarthy. There have been times when I've wanted McCarthy to close out games more aggressively than he has, but I don't see it as a major concern. Most NFL coaches are more conservative than fans in those situations.

"evad04" wrote:


Bingo. It is very difficult to know the intentions and full context of what goes into a decision. This difficulty is conveniently sidestepped by most fans, though, and the issue to me isn't the small amount of space made for criticism but rather the vast expanse of amateurish know-it-all-ness.

Now, in the case of Schottenheimer the whole "Martyball" thing is pretty well-known. He often got extremely conservative at the most crucial moments. This tendency, you could argue, came mostly from his expertise as a defensive minded coach (a common misnomer). That said, his overall blueprint was hugely successful.

In McCarthy's case there are isolated incidents of similar conservatism but on the whole they are mostly incomparable to Marty. McCarthy's scheme itself is on a totally different evolved plane. How many times do we credit the scheme for its aggressiveness or ability to create mismatches? We don't. Most fans take the position that Green Bay's talent overcomes McCarthy's ineptitude. It is ludicrous to me, and I imagine that sentiment would be equally-not-more-ridiculous to NFL scouts and former-and-current head coaches who praise him.

There's an extent to which being critical of playcalling is a bedrock of experiencing football. I participate the same way -- I'm guilty of the very thing I'm arguing against. The point here is just to know that my criticisms can only hold so much weight -- very little.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Really guys why do you think Mike McCarthy is a bad coach?He turned Aaron Rodgers into what he is today,He is a good offensive minded coach.Lets not forget he hired Capers and Kevin Greene only one thats suspect is slocum.His record as a coach is 42-29 not to shaby.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I guess every team that doesn't win a Super Bowl should fire their coach immediately.

31 coaches last year should have been fired.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
yooperfan
14 years ago
TT has job security in Green Bay for as long as he wants to stay and he and Mike McCarthy are joined at the waist so Mike McCarthy does as well.
Under Ted Thompson the Packers will have a winning record most years and will win a division championship periodically, even make the playoffs now and again.
The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

Building through the draft is an admiral plan but every once in a while the dice have to be rolled or that's all that is ever done is building for the future.
At some point the future is now.

Sorry for my interruption, let the Ted Thompson lovefest continue.
yooperfan
14 years ago
Oh yeah, no matter what, every home game will be sold out for years to come.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Yooper - I can almost guarantee you that upper management is aware we have a significant injury problem this year and they've been on the phone with other teams.

This year has been our strongest chance to win it all since 2007. They know this.

Now what we need are other teams that are desperate enough to do something stupid so we can take advantage of it. Our biggest priority right now shouldn't have been going after M. Lynch, but replacing our SS. If Nick Barnett is out for the year as well, we'll need a MLB as well.

Just like picking up babes, if you appear desperate, you will be exploited.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

Ted Thompson has job security in Green Bay for as long as he wants to stay and he and Mike McCarthy are joined at the waist so Mike McCarthy does as well.
Under Ted Thompson the Packers will have a winning record most years and will win a division championship periodically, even make the playoffs now and again.
The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

Building through the draft is an admiral plan but every once in a while the dice have to be rolled or that's all that is ever done is building for the future.
At some point the future is now.

Sorry for my interruption, let the Ted Thompson lovefest continue.

"yooperfan" wrote:



I agree mostly, but in the end, FA or not, I look, did Ted supply players to win a SB. If mccarthy messes with those players, that is on McCarthy. Biggest Gripe I will have with Ted after this season, win or lose is not canning Mccarthy.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
yooperfan
14 years ago

Yooper - I can almost guarantee you that upper management is aware we have a significant injury problem this year and they've been on the phone with other teams.

This year has been our strongest chance to win it all since 2007. They know this.

Now what we need are other teams that are desperate enough to do something stupid so we can take advantage of it. Our biggest priority right now shouldn't have been going after M. Lynch, but replacing our SS. If Nick Barnett is out for the year as well, we'll need a MLB as well.

Just like picking up babes, if you appear desperate, you will be exploited.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Slayer you are one of my favorite contributors, but I SO disagree with you on your stance on the running game.

If Ted Thompson is not on the phone, I'd be more disappointed in him than I have been since he was hired. We are getting to the point of being desperate with all the injuries and no running game.
But then I don't know about desperation because I have had the good fortune of never having been desperate.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
MM's best season when it came to playcalling was 2007. Loved his playcalling that year.

He's also one heck of a developer for QBs. He salvaged Favre's career and helped build Rodgers into an elite QB.

I am against canning him. But I do think there are parts of his game that could be improved. My biggest beef with Mike McCarthy is that he needs to go for the throat when the opponent is on the ropes.

In his defense, he tried that against the Lions and the pass got picked off. but like a few others have said, I believe in living and dying by aggression. What I hate is when we go soft. I like pounding your opponents like Belichick does. Or last year when the Vikings beat the Cows, the game was already over and Favre threw his 4th TD. Got the Cows so pissed off that one of the Cows ran onto the field and had some unkind words directed at the Vikings.

I love that. Shoot 'em in the head when he's down to make sure he's dead. I wish Mike McCarthy would do that.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
zombieslayer
14 years ago



Slayer you are one of my favorite contributors, but I SO disagree with you on your stance on the running game.

If Ted Thompson is not on the phone, I'd be more disappointed in him than I have been since he was hired. We are getting to the point of being desperate with all the injuries and no running game.
But then I don't know about desperation because I have had the good fortune of never having been desperate.

"yooperfan" wrote:



Yooper - Ted dropped the ball with Lynch. Had I known that that was all it would take to get Lynch, we should have signed the papers. Lynch is dang good in screens. I saw him at UC Berkeley.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (9h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (9h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Rude!
beast (13h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (17h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (19h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (21h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.