Greg C.
14 years ago

The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

"yooperfan" wrote:



"Never" is a long word, especially when the Packers came within an eyelash of making it to the Super Bowl in Thompson's third year as GM. Also, they were one of the hottest teams in the league during the second half of last season, and they lost in overtime in the first round of the playoffs.

Thompson and McCarthy have been good overall, and I think they have earned at least another year or two to prove that they can be great. When I look around the league, there are very few teams whose coach/GM combo I envy. Thompson and McCarthy are right up there among the best of them. You could argue that the Steelers, Patriots, and Colts have better coach/GM combos, but after that nobody really stands out--and if those three are ahead of the pack, it's not by much.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Don't forget the Saints.

But you're right. We're definitely up there.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
yooperfan
14 years ago

The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

"Greg C." wrote:



"Never" is a long word, especially when the Packers came within an eyelash of making it to the Super Bowl in Thompson's third year as GM. Also, they were one of the hottest teams in the league during the second half of last season, and they lost in overtime in the first round of the playoffs.

Thompson and McCarthy have been good overall, and I think they have earned at least another year or two to prove that they can be great. When I look around the league, there are very few teams whose coach/GM combo I envy. Thompson and McCarthy are right up there among the best of them. You could argue that the Steelers, Patriots, and Colts have better coach/GM combos, but after that nobody really stands out--and if those three are ahead of the pack, it's not by much.

"yooperfan" wrote:



I'll stick to my prediction thet the Packers will never win a Super Bowl under TT.
The window is only open so long and after this year I think it is starting to close.
Woody is getting old, Driver as well. I think Finley will be highly sought and move on.
Barnetts best years are behind him and probably Grants too.
When you only build through the draft, I believe you are building year after year without alot of progress. Ted Thompson has been successful building a good core group via the draft but unless he steps outside the box I think there won't be much progress toward a SB.
Greg C.
14 years ago

The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

"yooperfan" wrote:



"Never" is a long word, especially when the Packers came within an eyelash of making it to the Super Bowl in Thompson's third year as GM. Also, they were one of the hottest teams in the league during the second half of last season, and they lost in overtime in the first round of the playoffs.

Thompson and McCarthy have been good overall, and I think they have earned at least another year or two to prove that they can be great. When I look around the league, there are very few teams whose coach/GM combo I envy. Thompson and McCarthy are right up there among the best of them. You could argue that the Steelers, Patriots, and Colts have better coach/GM combos, but after that nobody really stands out--and if those three are ahead of the pack, it's not by much.

"Greg C." wrote:



I'll stick to my prediction thet the Packers will never win a Super Bowl under Ted Thompson.
The window is only open so long and after this year I think it is starting to close.
Woody is getting old, Driver as well. I think Finley will be highly sought and move on.
Barnetts best years are behind him and probably Grants too.
When you only build through the draft, I believe you are building year after year without alot of progress.
Ted Thompson has been successful building a good core group via the draft but unless he steps outside the box I think there won't be much progress toward a SB.

"yooperfan" wrote:



Well, we'll see. The Colts and Steelers have made it to two Super Bowls apiece in recent years, winning three out of the four, plus they've gone deep into the playoffs several times, and they've done it with even fewer big name free agent signings than the Packers. So it can be done. But the drafting and the coaching have to be top-notch.
blank
Pack93z
14 years ago
Damn... I remember getting excused from the playoffs for a couple of years before 96.. good thing we didn't shit can that bunch the couldn't get past Dallas after 95.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Greg C.
14 years ago

Damn... I remember getting excused from the playoffs for a couple of years before 96.. go thing we didn't shit can that bunch the couldn't get past Dallas after 95.

"pack93z" wrote:



Yep, the fans were much more patient back then, mainly for two reasons:

1. The Packers had been down for so long that the fans were happy just to have their team back on the map again.

2. There was no Internet to get people all riled up.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Or Greg, how about #3?

Internet has made attention spans really, really short.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Johnson
14 years ago
I think Ted's basic philosophy set him up to fail from the beginning, and if he gets the ax he'll drag Mike McCarthy down with him. I hope I'm wrong, cause I want the Pack to win the big dance again, but the vast majority of the time, the team that is willing to spend money at the right time (and yes that means FA's) add the juice needed to put them over the top.
Ted Thompson throws nickles around like they're manhole covers. He has stated that he prefers to rebuild through the draft, and he has added a few good player's through free agency, but the Packers are on the cusp of being great and he hasn't filled a few key positions.
blank
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago
I can't see chopping either unless there's some sort of precipitous decline the rest of the season, and even then I can't see it. Thompson has built a team that should get to the post season on a regular basis - no, he doesn't do it in a sexy way, but I look at the fine lists other posters have made and it's hard to say anything but "thank you, Ted".

McCarthy has his flaws, but he got Favre to follow a gameplan and in so doing got the Packers to within a hair of the Super Bowl in '07. He's obviously helped turn Rodgers into a great NFL QB on top of that.

The teams that are successful year in and year out do not make knee-jerk moves. You can count the Steelers' coaches for the past 20-some years on one hand. Since Bellicheat's been with the Pats, they make it into the post season with regularity. Free agency has in effect killed the kinds of dynasties we used to know, where one team was almost a shoe-in for the SB for 3-4 years running, but in their place are teams like the Steelers and Pats, who by staying consistent with their coaches and F.O. manage to re-tool and continue to compete at a high level even as players move in and out. That's what I want for the Packers as a fan - a realistic expectation that they've got what it takes to compete at a high level every year and a high probability that they'll get into the post season.

And I truly don't believe you can attain that if you knock over the apple cart because the team didn't win the SB in a given year. I think it takes a calm commitment to stay the path.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
I like what ILike said. In today's free agent era, the best way to win a SB is to be a perennial playoff team. Look at the Pats for instance. They were in 4 SBs and won 3 of them by being in the playoffs almost every year of the 00s.

Fact - we were in the Playoffs 2 of the past 3 years. My opinion - unless Rodgers, CM3, or Woody get injured (knocking on wood as I type this), we'll be in the Playoffs this year.

Before we start calling for TT's or MM's dismissal, who is out there who is available? Anyone? Anyone? Beuller?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (15m) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (16m) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Rude!
beast (4h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (10h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (12h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
14m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.