bozz_2006
14 years ago
Hindsight is 20/20. It's easy to be critical of a play that didn't work. Not so easy to call plays that always do work.
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

Buncha playcallin' experts on these boards. Interesting, seeing as no one here spends 80 hours a week designing and implementing game plans.

Honestly, the level of depth that goes into offensive and defensive schemes is ASTOUNDING.

And thus SIMPLY it is almost impossible to be legitimately critical of playcalling. One simply does not possess the requisite mastery of concepts, nor is one capable to confer the success or lack of success of a playcall because the of the multitude of variables.

I don't claim any brilliance, but conversations like the one Greg C started about this topic indicate that there's usually more to a play than what immediately catches the eye.

How can someone be critical of something they don't understand? Seriously? Riddle me that -- I'll bake you a cake, a cookie, whatever you prefer. I'll wash your car. I'll get a tramp stamp. I'll take a "Croc Shot" and send it to my employers.

Even if you were the star receiver on your high school team, or you played guard at the junior-college level, or if you play a lot of Madden (like I used to), or if you're just a MMQB or keyboard warrior -- you're probably not qualified to critique playcalling at the level appropriate to be considered legitimate.

"Greg C." wrote:



I mostly agree with you on this, but I do think there is some room for fans to be critical. The reason is that although coaches know a lot more about playcalling than any of us do, they are human and they are prone to making human mistakes--overanalyzing, being too cautious, getting into ruts, that sort of thing. The problem is that it is usually difficult for fans to determine whether coaches are really making those mistakes or whether they are calling the right plays based on information that we are not aware of, and the plays just are not working for one reason or another.

But there are patterns that emerge after awhile. For example, I have no faith in Marty Schottenheimer's playcalling in clutch situations, having watched his teams choke in the playoffs for years. Some people feel that way about Mike McCarthy. There have been times when I've wanted McCarthy to close out games more aggressively than he has, but I don't see it as a major concern. Most NFL coaches are more conservative than fans in those situations.

"evad04" wrote:


Bingo. It is very difficult to know the intentions and full context of what goes into a decision. This difficulty is conveniently sidestepped by most fans, though, and the issue to me isn't the small amount of space made for criticism but rather the vast expanse of amateurish know-it-all-ness.

Now, in the case of Schottenheimer the whole "Martyball" thing is pretty well-known. He often got extremely conservative at the most crucial moments. This tendency, you could argue, came mostly from his expertise as a defensive minded coach (a common misnomer). That said, his overall blueprint was hugely successful.

In McCarthy's case there are isolated incidents of similar conservatism but on the whole they are mostly incomparable to Marty. McCarthy's scheme itself is on a totally different evolved plane. How many times do we credit the scheme for its aggressiveness or ability to create mismatches? We don't. Most fans take the position that Green Bay's talent overcomes McCarthy's ineptitude. It is ludicrous to me, and I imagine that sentiment would be equally-not-more-ridiculous to NFL scouts and former-and-current head coaches who praise him.

There's an extent to which being critical of playcalling is a bedrock of experiencing football. I participate the same way -- I'm guilty of the very thing I'm arguing against. The point here is just to know that my criticisms can only hold so much weight -- very little.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Really guys why do you think Mike McCarthy is a bad coach?He turned Aaron Rodgers into what he is today,He is a good offensive minded coach.Lets not forget he hired Capers and Kevin Greene only one thats suspect is slocum.His record as a coach is 42-29 not to shaby.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I guess every team that doesn't win a Super Bowl should fire their coach immediately.

31 coaches last year should have been fired.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
yooperfan
14 years ago
TT has job security in Green Bay for as long as he wants to stay and he and Mike McCarthy are joined at the waist so Mike McCarthy does as well.
Under Ted Thompson the Packers will have a winning record most years and will win a division championship periodically, even make the playoffs now and again.
The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

Building through the draft is an admiral plan but every once in a while the dice have to be rolled or that's all that is ever done is building for the future.
At some point the future is now.

Sorry for my interruption, let the Ted Thompson lovefest continue.
yooperfan
14 years ago
Oh yeah, no matter what, every home game will be sold out for years to come.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Yooper - I can almost guarantee you that upper management is aware we have a significant injury problem this year and they've been on the phone with other teams.

This year has been our strongest chance to win it all since 2007. They know this.

Now what we need are other teams that are desperate enough to do something stupid so we can take advantage of it. Our biggest priority right now shouldn't have been going after M. Lynch, but replacing our SS. If Nick Barnett is out for the year as well, we'll need a MLB as well.

Just like picking up babes, if you appear desperate, you will be exploited.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

Ted Thompson has job security in Green Bay for as long as he wants to stay and he and Mike McCarthy are joined at the waist so Mike McCarthy does as well.
Under Ted Thompson the Packers will have a winning record most years and will win a division championship periodically, even make the playoffs now and again.
The problem is that under Ted Thompson the Packers will never get to the Superbowl because he won't roll the dice using free agency or trades to add the necessary piece or pieces to get the Packers over the top.

Building through the draft is an admiral plan but every once in a while the dice have to be rolled or that's all that is ever done is building for the future.
At some point the future is now.

Sorry for my interruption, let the Ted Thompson lovefest continue.

"yooperfan" wrote:



I agree mostly, but in the end, FA or not, I look, did Ted supply players to win a SB. If mccarthy messes with those players, that is on McCarthy. Biggest Gripe I will have with Ted after this season, win or lose is not canning Mccarthy.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
yooperfan
14 years ago

Yooper - I can almost guarantee you that upper management is aware we have a significant injury problem this year and they've been on the phone with other teams.

This year has been our strongest chance to win it all since 2007. They know this.

Now what we need are other teams that are desperate enough to do something stupid so we can take advantage of it. Our biggest priority right now shouldn't have been going after M. Lynch, but replacing our SS. If Nick Barnett is out for the year as well, we'll need a MLB as well.

Just like picking up babes, if you appear desperate, you will be exploited.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Slayer you are one of my favorite contributors, but I SO disagree with you on your stance on the running game.

If Ted Thompson is not on the phone, I'd be more disappointed in him than I have been since he was hired. We are getting to the point of being desperate with all the injuries and no running game.
But then I don't know about desperation because I have had the good fortune of never having been desperate.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
MM's best season when it came to playcalling was 2007. Loved his playcalling that year.

He's also one heck of a developer for QBs. He salvaged Favre's career and helped build Rodgers into an elite QB.

I am against canning him. But I do think there are parts of his game that could be improved. My biggest beef with Mike McCarthy is that he needs to go for the throat when the opponent is on the ropes.

In his defense, he tried that against the Lions and the pass got picked off. but like a few others have said, I believe in living and dying by aggression. What I hate is when we go soft. I like pounding your opponents like Belichick does. Or last year when the Vikings beat the Cows, the game was already over and Favre threw his 4th TD. Got the Cows so pissed off that one of the Cows ran onto the field and had some unkind words directed at the Vikings.

I love that. Shoot 'em in the head when he's down to make sure he's dead. I wish Mike McCarthy would do that.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
zombieslayer
14 years ago



Slayer you are one of my favorite contributors, but I SO disagree with you on your stance on the running game.

If Ted Thompson is not on the phone, I'd be more disappointed in him than I have been since he was hired. We are getting to the point of being desperate with all the injuries and no running game.
But then I don't know about desperation because I have had the good fortune of never having been desperate.

"yooperfan" wrote:



Yooper - Ted dropped the ball with Lynch. Had I known that that was all it would take to get Lynch, we should have signed the papers. Lynch is dang good in screens. I saw him at UC Berkeley.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St
Zero2Cool (13h) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."
Zero2Cool (13h) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.
Zero2Cool (14h) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Stud
Zero2Cool (17h) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
15h / Around The NFL / beast

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.