If that had top five least AND most, that'd be better in my view. Show both sides of the coin.

"beast" wrote:

You're asking the same question I already answered. I DO NOT CARE WHICH TEAM IS FIRST OR LAST IN THIS POLL. It's the nature of the poll and continuing of polls of its like that bother me.

So get the fuck off this shit about "oh what it if it was X team".


THE TEAM IS IRRELEVANT!

:pukeright: :pukeright: :pukeright: :pukeright:

"musccy" wrote:

If the team/city truly is irrelevant, then why aren't you the flag bearer for the petition to ban negative polls in Cosmo, Men's Health, seventeen, SI, etc.?

There are polls about "who's hot/not," drunkest cities, worst town to have a one-night stand in, best/worst running towns and on and on and on in every magazine in the country, every single week. However, I haven't seen you get upset about it until your hometown is depicted negatively in a poll.

It's quite common and really not that big of a deal. Although not my hometown, I've lived in GB and don't take it personally, nor should you.

"musccy" wrote:

is this true? if so, that's pretty cool.

now, before you shut me out, i grew up in Appleton and used to visit Green Bay about 1-3 times a week to go to Kutska's & Concert Cafe as a teenager. i was in a band in high-school which practiced in GB. i worked for a year in Ashwaubanon. and so on and so forth. then at age 18 i moved to Milwaukee and was like "whoa, a real city!" and after that i moved to Boston where people said things like "oh. i'm sorry." after i told them where i moved from. then after that i moved to NYC where people said "fuck Boston, that place sucks." and now i live in Chapel Hill where nobody gives a shit about such things.

point is, if you're not on the map, you're not on the map...and even if you *are* on the map, people still have problems with it or you. if i didn't grow up in WI i'd have NO reason to even think that visiting Milwaukee or Madison is a good idea let alone Green Bay and that's like...the two cities people outside the frozen glove-state have actually heard of. sure, people know about the Packers but they have no idea where the feck they're from! the thing about Green Bay's organization is that it is, and hopefully always will be, different. and this is obviously something you just have to see and experience for yourself. look at the way our players handle the media and furthermore...never end up in the media for shooting themselves in the leg.

i say let people continue to wonder wtf Green Bay is all about. i love and have always loved that we are the absolute fucking ANTITHESIS to the fucking Dallas Cowboys.

the end.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

If the team/city truly is irrelevant, then why aren't you the flag bearer for the petition to ban negative polls in Cosmo, Men's Health, seventeen, SI, etc.?

---

It's quite common and really not that big of a deal. Although not my hometown, I've lived in GB and don't take it personally, nor should you.

"musccy" wrote:

The whole negativity sells thing has always bothered me. Something I pointed out to the staff was the day following a loss, the site's hit count boomed. After a win, crickets could be heard. Personally, that's wrong in my view. And more to the negativity sells thing, that's why I can't stand watching the news. They want to find some 'scoop' and its almost always about what bad happened to who. That's not news, that's tragedy. and you know what makes it worse? Us, because us as a whole glue our damn attention to it.

For some reason, that made me laugh out loud. +1 to you, sir.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

3- Green Bay is a small town. True. How is that a bad thing? You'd think lots of free agents would like that. At least, I would think.
4- Weather in Green Bay is fine. If you don't like it, wait 15 minutes, it'll change.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Don't you dare tell me whawt I should or shouldn't take personally. I live my life, you live yours. Understood? Thank you.

As for your post, you make no sense at all. I don't read any of those magazines you mentioned and I don't often look at polls either. I think they're content is derived of profit monkeys who don't really care about the results, but rather the financial results.

I've said a few times that the team and city are not relevant. I'm not sure why you're so hell bent on calling me a liar and trying to prove me to be one I find very offensive and uncalled for.

"Zero2Cool" wrote: