Zero2Cool
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Then you adjust. You run elsewhere. Go with what works.
UserPostedImage
Tezzy
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Are you saying replacing Barbre would make that situation any better? All you would have done is make the better side of the line, well.. better. Or are you agreeing and saying the left side of the line needs to be worked on first to balance it out? Because I would love to see balance as well.

And Rios, I don't recall Barbre giving up both of our 2 sacks on the day. I'm going to watch the tape. If he did give up 2 that means he gave up 0 against the Bengals since he has a total of 5 on the season, and we know the sad 3 he gave up against the Bearcubs. And isn't part of that what you like, is that he has improved since week 1? That's what I'm looking for in any player. Especially on our oline where we have a glaring deficiency. And with Cliffy getting hurt again this year, I'm concerned more about availability. And we saw what happened when Clifton wasn't available (I don't blame it all on Colledge, that was a tough sledding kind of day). Well I ramble on, but I like this debate.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Tezzy
15 years ago
And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago
Well lets hope he gets that sured up and Clifton can keep Allen at bay.

I actually like our interior line.
blank
Rios39
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.
blank
Tezzy
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. 😛
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. =P

"Tezzy" wrote:



I was not intreting it wrong, but I was wrong. You're right, it was Barbre who gave up the two sacks by Little.

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Rios39" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.

"Tezzy" wrote:


Nothing odd about it. I was wrong. It was Barbre, not Colledge. I was going by what they were saying on the radio show. But I just watched the footage again and clearly it was Barbre, not Colledge.

That's a good sign.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. =P

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I was not intreting it wrong, but I was wrong. You're right, it was Barbre who gave up the two sacks by Little.

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Rios39" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Nothing odd about it. I was wrong. It was Barbre, not Colledge. I was going by what they were saying on the radio show. But I just watched the footage again and clearly it was Barbre, not Colledge.

That's a good sign.

"Tezzy" wrote:


Just curious?

How is that a good sign? since that confirms Barbre is being a huge liability in pass protection.

Colledge doesn't play LT and he did ok, considering. I'm very concerned about our RT situation and not concerned much about the rest of the line. But what one WEAK spot will do is make the mistakes from Clifton, Spitz, Colledge, Sitton look all that more glaring when they do (and they will) happen. Barbre needs to sharpen up or we are in big problems.

I think it's un-acceptable to have the skilled players like Rodgers, Grant, Jennings, Driver, Jones, Finley but have ONE or two positions not allowing them to fully succeed. That one weakness really gives headaches for everyone. It should have been addressed.

Now that it's hasn't, Barbre is going to have to improve or bring someone in that will. The game against the Rams would have been my last straw with him and I would have brought in someone that can at least challenge for a spot vs a big game against the Vikings.
blank
TheEngineer
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"Tezzy" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



Are you saying replacing Barbre would make that situation any better? All you would have done is make the better side of the line, well.. better. Or are you agreeing and saying the left side of the line needs to be worked on first to balance it out? Because I would love to see balance as well.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



What I meant by my phrase wasn't necessarily to call out on players who need to be replaced. I think naturally McCarthy needs to grind it out in the middle in order to have the success he does on the outside. I think the reason we gain good yards around the outside is that opponents know they can get good penetration in the centre on a dive play, so they clog up the middle expecting another 1 yard gain. Since Grant is pushed off tackle or on a power play, the defensive linemen are trapped in the centre unable to make a play on Grant by the time he's around the corner. That's how we can see 8 yard gains.

Although that is nice to see, I'd rather have a solid 5 yards per run in any direction. I don't want to see opponents clogging up the middle expecting a inside run and stopping us for 1 or 2 yards every 3 out of 4 attempts. I want them to be hesitant to penetrate too far in case Grant pulls it left or right. I want them to hesitate slightly before committing. I want them knowing that Grant can turn it upfield anywhere behind the line of scrimmage. I think McCarthy should run more outside runs to achieve this balance.


As for the players on the offensive line, I believe Barbre is supposedly solid against the run. I still want to see TJ Lang at LT. I don't know if replacing our linemen is the right strategy since there isn't a bona fide starter in free agency, and they'd take time to learn our offense. I think better playcalling in this regard is the first step to an improved offensive line, even if we have the same guys.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (3h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (3h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : WR Odell Beckham Jr is officially a free agent after clearing waivers.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : Packers are 6th in sacks.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : RB David Montgomery will undergo season-ending knee surgery.
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Dan Campbell on onside kick with 12 minutes left: In hindsight, wish I didn’t do that
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : They have that whole 12th man thing so ...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.