Zero2Cool
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Then you adjust. You run elsewhere. Go with what works.
UserPostedImage
Tezzy
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Are you saying replacing Barbre would make that situation any better? All you would have done is make the better side of the line, well.. better. Or are you agreeing and saying the left side of the line needs to be worked on first to balance it out? Because I would love to see balance as well.

And Rios, I don't recall Barbre giving up both of our 2 sacks on the day. I'm going to watch the tape. If he did give up 2 that means he gave up 0 against the Bengals since he has a total of 5 on the season, and we know the sad 3 he gave up against the Bearcubs. And isn't part of that what you like, is that he has improved since week 1? That's what I'm looking for in any player. Especially on our oline where we have a glaring deficiency. And with Cliffy getting hurt again this year, I'm concerned more about availability. And we saw what happened when Clifton wasn't available (I don't blame it all on Colledge, that was a tough sledding kind of day). Well I ramble on, but I like this debate.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Tezzy
15 years ago
And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago
Well lets hope he gets that sured up and Clifton can keep Allen at bay.

I actually like our interior line.
blank
Rios39
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.
blank
Tezzy
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. 😛
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. =P

"Tezzy" wrote:



I was not intreting it wrong, but I was wrong. You're right, it was Barbre who gave up the two sacks by Little.

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Rios39" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.

"Tezzy" wrote:


Nothing odd about it. I was wrong. It was Barbre, not Colledge. I was going by what they were saying on the radio show. But I just watched the footage again and clearly it was Barbre, not Colledge.

That's a good sign.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. =P

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I was not intreting it wrong, but I was wrong. You're right, it was Barbre who gave up the two sacks by Little.

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Rios39" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Nothing odd about it. I was wrong. It was Barbre, not Colledge. I was going by what they were saying on the radio show. But I just watched the footage again and clearly it was Barbre, not Colledge.

That's a good sign.

"Tezzy" wrote:


Just curious?

How is that a good sign? since that confirms Barbre is being a huge liability in pass protection.

Colledge doesn't play LT and he did ok, considering. I'm very concerned about our RT situation and not concerned much about the rest of the line. But what one WEAK spot will do is make the mistakes from Clifton, Spitz, Colledge, Sitton look all that more glaring when they do (and they will) happen. Barbre needs to sharpen up or we are in big problems.

I think it's un-acceptable to have the skilled players like Rodgers, Grant, Jennings, Driver, Jones, Finley but have ONE or two positions not allowing them to fully succeed. That one weakness really gives headaches for everyone. It should have been addressed.

Now that it's hasn't, Barbre is going to have to improve or bring someone in that will. The game against the Rams would have been my last straw with him and I would have brought in someone that can at least challenge for a spot vs a big game against the Vikings.
blank
TheEngineer
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"Tezzy" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



Are you saying replacing Barbre would make that situation any better? All you would have done is make the better side of the line, well.. better. Or are you agreeing and saying the left side of the line needs to be worked on first to balance it out? Because I would love to see balance as well.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



What I meant by my phrase wasn't necessarily to call out on players who need to be replaced. I think naturally McCarthy needs to grind it out in the middle in order to have the success he does on the outside. I think the reason we gain good yards around the outside is that opponents know they can get good penetration in the centre on a dive play, so they clog up the middle expecting another 1 yard gain. Since Grant is pushed off tackle or on a power play, the defensive linemen are trapped in the centre unable to make a play on Grant by the time he's around the corner. That's how we can see 8 yard gains.

Although that is nice to see, I'd rather have a solid 5 yards per run in any direction. I don't want to see opponents clogging up the middle expecting a inside run and stopping us for 1 or 2 yards every 3 out of 4 attempts. I want them to be hesitant to penetrate too far in case Grant pulls it left or right. I want them to hesitate slightly before committing. I want them knowing that Grant can turn it upfield anywhere behind the line of scrimmage. I think McCarthy should run more outside runs to achieve this balance.


As for the players on the offensive line, I believe Barbre is supposedly solid against the run. I still want to see TJ Lang at LT. I don't know if replacing our linemen is the right strategy since there isn't a bona fide starter in free agency, and they'd take time to learn our offense. I think better playcalling in this regard is the first step to an improved offensive line, even if we have the same guys.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (4h) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (4h) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (6h) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (10h) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.