Zero2Cool
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Then you adjust. You run elsewhere. Go with what works.
UserPostedImage
Tezzy
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Are you saying replacing Barbre would make that situation any better? All you would have done is make the better side of the line, well.. better. Or are you agreeing and saying the left side of the line needs to be worked on first to balance it out? Because I would love to see balance as well.

And Rios, I don't recall Barbre giving up both of our 2 sacks on the day. I'm going to watch the tape. If he did give up 2 that means he gave up 0 against the Bengals since he has a total of 5 on the season, and we know the sad 3 he gave up against the Bearcubs. And isn't part of that what you like, is that he has improved since week 1? That's what I'm looking for in any player. Especially on our oline where we have a glaring deficiency. And with Cliffy getting hurt again this year, I'm concerned more about availability. And we saw what happened when Clifton wasn't available (I don't blame it all on Colledge, that was a tough sledding kind of day). Well I ramble on, but I like this debate.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Tezzy
15 years ago
And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago
Well lets hope he gets that sured up and Clifton can keep Allen at bay.

I actually like our interior line.
blank
Rios39
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.
blank
Tezzy
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. 😛
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. =P

"Tezzy" wrote:



I was not intreting it wrong, but I was wrong. You're right, it was Barbre who gave up the two sacks by Little.

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Rios39" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.

"Tezzy" wrote:


Nothing odd about it. I was wrong. It was Barbre, not Colledge. I was going by what they were saying on the radio show. But I just watched the footage again and clearly it was Barbre, not Colledge.

That's a good sign.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Tezzy" wrote:



I think you are interpreting that wrong. The depth chart is facing the opponent, so Little was on the left side of the defense, which is our right. it's like looking in a mirror or something. =P

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I was not intreting it wrong, but I was wrong. You're right, it was Barbre who gave up the two sacks by Little.

And yes Barbre did give up the two sacks. Little is the left DE who had both sacks. I

"Tezzy" wrote:


Click HERE  and click the Depth Chart.

Colledge was on Little. Not Barbre. Chris Long was on Barbre.

"Rios39" wrote:



That's odd because Colledge said after the game he never gave up a sack. But allowed 2 hits or something.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Nothing odd about it. I was wrong. It was Barbre, not Colledge. I was going by what they were saying on the radio show. But I just watched the footage again and clearly it was Barbre, not Colledge.

That's a good sign.

"Tezzy" wrote:


Just curious?

How is that a good sign? since that confirms Barbre is being a huge liability in pass protection.

Colledge doesn't play LT and he did ok, considering. I'm very concerned about our RT situation and not concerned much about the rest of the line. But what one WEAK spot will do is make the mistakes from Clifton, Spitz, Colledge, Sitton look all that more glaring when they do (and they will) happen. Barbre needs to sharpen up or we are in big problems.

I think it's un-acceptable to have the skilled players like Rodgers, Grant, Jennings, Driver, Jones, Finley but have ONE or two positions not allowing them to fully succeed. That one weakness really gives headaches for everyone. It should have been addressed.

Now that it's hasn't, Barbre is going to have to improve or bring someone in that will. The game against the Rams would have been my last straw with him and I would have brought in someone that can at least challenge for a spot vs a big game against the Vikings.
blank
TheEngineer
15 years ago

But he is getting the job done on the field. Mike McCarthy just isn't exploiting his strengths.

Run to the outside right -- gain yards. Run it up the middle -- get stuffed. Simple equation.

"Tezzy" wrote:



If you're always running to the right, then the defenses will start to shift across. I'm glad we're seeing success in the outside run. We just have to balance out the amount of outside runs (both left and right) with runs up the middle.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



Are you saying replacing Barbre would make that situation any better? All you would have done is make the better side of the line, well.. better. Or are you agreeing and saying the left side of the line needs to be worked on first to balance it out? Because I would love to see balance as well.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



What I meant by my phrase wasn't necessarily to call out on players who need to be replaced. I think naturally McCarthy needs to grind it out in the middle in order to have the success he does on the outside. I think the reason we gain good yards around the outside is that opponents know they can get good penetration in the centre on a dive play, so they clog up the middle expecting another 1 yard gain. Since Grant is pushed off tackle or on a power play, the defensive linemen are trapped in the centre unable to make a play on Grant by the time he's around the corner. That's how we can see 8 yard gains.

Although that is nice to see, I'd rather have a solid 5 yards per run in any direction. I don't want to see opponents clogging up the middle expecting a inside run and stopping us for 1 or 2 yards every 3 out of 4 attempts. I want them to be hesitant to penetrate too far in case Grant pulls it left or right. I want them to hesitate slightly before committing. I want them knowing that Grant can turn it upfield anywhere behind the line of scrimmage. I think McCarthy should run more outside runs to achieve this balance.


As for the players on the offensive line, I believe Barbre is supposedly solid against the run. I still want to see TJ Lang at LT. I don't know if replacing our linemen is the right strategy since there isn't a bona fide starter in free agency, and they'd take time to learn our offense. I think better playcalling in this regard is the first step to an improved offensive line, even if we have the same guys.
blank
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (15h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (15h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Rude!
beast (20h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (23h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

15h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.