warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

Question Warhawk..

"How does one stop the engines now?" :lol:

I am so jacked I could play ball today.. ;)

Excellent draft, solidified with a strong day 2.

"pack93z" wrote:



Man, even when we go four down with Kampman, Jolly, Raji, and Jenkins we're talking about a whole lot a shaking goin on. And it's going to be the opposing QB doing the shakin'.

Plus, I can't wait to see Jenkins over there taking on two blockers and watching Mathews come roaring in off the edge. Bam!
"The train is leaving the station."
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago

Question Warhawk..

"How does one stop the engines now?" :lol:

I am so jacked I could play ball today.. ;)

Excellent draft, solidified with a strong day 2.

"warhawk" wrote:



Man, even when we go four down with Kampman, Jolly, Raji, and Jenkins we're talking about a whole lot a shaking goin on. And it's going to be the opposing QB doing the shakin'.

Plus, I can't wait to see Jenkins over there taking on two blockers and watching Mathews come roaring in off the edge. Bam!

"pack93z" wrote:




The mind reels... what if (and I know it's a big IF, but still) Harrell gets healthy? Can you imagine a front line of Kampy, Harrell/Pick, Raji/Pick, Jenkins and Matthews/whoever else will play ROLB?

Harrell, Raji, Jenkins - all of them can take on multiple blockers and all have the potential to penetrate as well - what's AD gonna do if he's got O-linemen falling backwards and those 3 in his face as soon as he gets the ball?

Potential-wise, this D could be something to see - now they just have to reach that potential.
blank
porky88
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"dhazer" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.

The answer to both is probably yes to both.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
dhazer
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"porky88" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.




The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"dhazer" wrote:





Yo guys are right according to Mel Kiper but then again your wrong about the main thing and that is our team must really suck because Kiper says we got 5 starters from the draft. So if we are such a great team how the hell do you get 5 starters from the draft? He says The Blob will start at NT and the man of 3 will start at LB and the 2 OT's will start along with the FB. But your right we filled all our holes like we do every year.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"porky88" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.

The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"dhazer" wrote:



Three picks? Where do you get three picks from? We traded our 2nd round for their first then took a sixth for a third. So ultimately we lose one pick in the third round.

What's ironic is that I would have been o.k. with Meredith in the 3rd had we stayed put and we end up getting him later anyhow.
"The train is leaving the station."
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"dhazer" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.




The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"porky88" wrote:





Yo guys are right according to Mel Kiper but then again your wrong about the main thing and that is our team must really suck because Kiper says we got 5 starters from the draft. So if we are such a great team how the hell do you get 5 starters from the draft? He says The Blob will start at NT and the man of 3 will start at LB and the 2 OT's will start along with the FB. But your right we filled all our holes like we do every year.

"dhazer" wrote:



I heard Mel Kiper and what he said was the two OT's could EVENTUALLY become starters. He never said they would start or even see the field this year. J.T. Lang is a nasty converted defensive lineman with a lot of upside and Kiper never said they guy would compete for starting spot in '09.
"The train is leaving the station."
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
16 years ago

We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Well that is 3 for 1 if you don't count Meredith as the 2nd 5th round pick. ::roll:
UserPostedImage
porky88
16 years ago
5 starters is a projection down the road. I think maybe four, but the two offensive lineman aren't both going to start right away.

They got two probably right out of the gate.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.

"wpr" wrote:



Well that is 3 for 1 if you don't count Meredith as the 2nd 5th round pick. ::roll:

"SlickVision" wrote:



Why would you not count the pick they gave back in the 5th?


When your scheduled for 9 picks entering the draft and end up with eight and only made one trade that involved picks how can that trade add up to losing more than one pick?
"The train is leaving the station."
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (3h) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
    Martha Careful (3h) : Agree
    dfosterf (4h) : Great idea imo
    dfosterf (4h) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
    dfosterf (4h) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
    beast (10h) : Great point Martha
    beast (10h) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
    Martha Careful (13h) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
    beast (13h) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
    bboystyle (15h) : waiting for a pass rusher.
    dfosterf (17h) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
    dfosterf (18h) : 3rd. Hate this phone
    dfosterf (18h) : 4rd
    dfosterf (18h) : 5 minutes in the 4
    dfosterf (18h) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
    Martha Careful (18h) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
    Martha Careful (18h) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
    TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
    dfosterf (19h) : No.Absolutely not
    Zero2Cool (19h) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
    dhazer (19h) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
    TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : Damn that sucks
    Zero2Cool (21h) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
    beast (23h) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
    beast (23h) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
    packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
    beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
    TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
    TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
    TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.