warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

Question Warhawk..

"How does one stop the engines now?" :lol:

I am so jacked I could play ball today.. ;)

Excellent draft, solidified with a strong day 2.

"pack93z" wrote:



Man, even when we go four down with Kampman, Jolly, Raji, and Jenkins we're talking about a whole lot a shaking goin on. And it's going to be the opposing QB doing the shakin'.

Plus, I can't wait to see Jenkins over there taking on two blockers and watching Mathews come roaring in off the edge. Bam!
"The train is leaving the station."
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago

Question Warhawk..

"How does one stop the engines now?" :lol:

I am so jacked I could play ball today.. ;)

Excellent draft, solidified with a strong day 2.

"warhawk" wrote:



Man, even when we go four down with Kampman, Jolly, Raji, and Jenkins we're talking about a whole lot a shaking goin on. And it's going to be the opposing QB doing the shakin'.

Plus, I can't wait to see Jenkins over there taking on two blockers and watching Mathews come roaring in off the edge. Bam!

"pack93z" wrote:




The mind reels... what if (and I know it's a big IF, but still) Harrell gets healthy? Can you imagine a front line of Kampy, Harrell/Pick, Raji/Pick, Jenkins and Matthews/whoever else will play ROLB?

Harrell, Raji, Jenkins - all of them can take on multiple blockers and all have the potential to penetrate as well - what's AD gonna do if he's got O-linemen falling backwards and those 3 in his face as soon as he gets the ball?

Potential-wise, this D could be something to see - now they just have to reach that potential.
blank
porky88
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"dhazer" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.

The answer to both is probably yes to both.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
dhazer
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"porky88" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.




The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"dhazer" wrote:





Yo guys are right according to Mel Kiper but then again your wrong about the main thing and that is our team must really suck because Kiper says we got 5 starters from the draft. So if we are such a great team how the hell do you get 5 starters from the draft? He says The Blob will start at NT and the man of 3 will start at LB and the 2 OT's will start along with the FB. But your right we filled all our holes like we do every year.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"porky88" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.

The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"dhazer" wrote:



Three picks? Where do you get three picks from? We traded our 2nd round for their first then took a sixth for a third. So ultimately we lose one pick in the third round.

What's ironic is that I would have been o.k. with Meredith in the 3rd had we stayed put and we end up getting him later anyhow.
"The train is leaving the station."
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"dhazer" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.




The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"porky88" wrote:





Yo guys are right according to Mel Kiper but then again your wrong about the main thing and that is our team must really suck because Kiper says we got 5 starters from the draft. So if we are such a great team how the hell do you get 5 starters from the draft? He says The Blob will start at NT and the man of 3 will start at LB and the 2 OT's will start along with the FB. But your right we filled all our holes like we do every year.

"dhazer" wrote:



I heard Mel Kiper and what he said was the two OT's could EVENTUALLY become starters. He never said they would start or even see the field this year. J.T. Lang is a nasty converted defensive lineman with a lot of upside and Kiper never said they guy would compete for starting spot in '09.
"The train is leaving the station."
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
16 years ago

We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Well that is 3 for 1 if you don't count Meredith as the 2nd 5th round pick. ::roll:
UserPostedImage
porky88
16 years ago
5 starters is a projection down the road. I think maybe four, but the two offensive lineman aren't both going to start right away.

They got two probably right out of the gate.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.

"wpr" wrote:



Well that is 3 for 1 if you don't count Meredith as the 2nd 5th round pick. ::roll:

"SlickVision" wrote:



Why would you not count the pick they gave back in the 5th?


When your scheduled for 9 picks entering the draft and end up with eight and only made one trade that involved picks how can that trade add up to losing more than one pick?
"The train is leaving the station."
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (1h) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
    dfosterf (1h) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
    dfosterf (1h) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
    dfosterf (1h) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
    dfosterf (1h) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
    dfosterf (1h) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
    dfosterf (1h) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
    dfosterf (1h) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
    dfosterf (1h) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
    Zero2Cool (6h) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
    Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
    Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
    beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
    Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
    Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
    dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
    dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
    dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
    Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
    Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
    wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
    Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
    Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
    Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
    Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
    Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
    Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
    buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
    Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
    Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : Giants DC Shane Bowen tells players to “be a damn pirate."
    dfosterf (6-Jun) : Semper fi !
    Cheesey (6-Jun) : This is why I have so much respect for those that have gone through battles
    Cheesey (6-Jun) : I can't even imagine what that would have been like
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    10h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

    14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

    13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

    12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.