warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Question Warhawk..

"How does one stop the engines now?" :lol:

I am so jacked I could play ball today.. ;)

Excellent draft, solidified with a strong day 2.

"pack93z" wrote:



Man, even when we go four down with Kampman, Jolly, Raji, and Jenkins we're talking about a whole lot a shaking goin on. And it's going to be the opposing QB doing the shakin'.

Plus, I can't wait to see Jenkins over there taking on two blockers and watching Mathews come roaring in off the edge. Bam!
"The train is leaving the station."
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Question Warhawk..

"How does one stop the engines now?" :lol:

I am so jacked I could play ball today.. ;)

Excellent draft, solidified with a strong day 2.

"warhawk" wrote:



Man, even when we go four down with Kampman, Jolly, Raji, and Jenkins we're talking about a whole lot a shaking goin on. And it's going to be the opposing QB doing the shakin'.

Plus, I can't wait to see Jenkins over there taking on two blockers and watching Mathews come roaring in off the edge. Bam!

"pack93z" wrote:




The mind reels... what if (and I know it's a big IF, but still) Harrell gets healthy? Can you imagine a front line of Kampy, Harrell/Pick, Raji/Pick, Jenkins and Matthews/whoever else will play ROLB?

Harrell, Raji, Jenkins - all of them can take on multiple blockers and all have the potential to penetrate as well - what's AD gonna do if he's got O-linemen falling backwards and those 3 in his face as soon as he gets the ball?

Potential-wise, this D could be something to see - now they just have to reach that potential.
blank
porky88
15 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"dhazer" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.

The answer to both is probably yes to both.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"porky88" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.




The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"dhazer" wrote:





Yo guys are right according to Mel Kiper but then again your wrong about the main thing and that is our team must really suck because Kiper says we got 5 starters from the draft. So if we are such a great team how the hell do you get 5 starters from the draft? He says The Blob will start at NT and the man of 3 will start at LB and the 2 OT's will start along with the FB. But your right we filled all our holes like we do every year.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"porky88" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.

The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"dhazer" wrote:



Three picks? Where do you get three picks from? We traded our 2nd round for their first then took a sixth for a third. So ultimately we lose one pick in the third round.

What's ironic is that I would have been o.k. with Meredith in the 3rd had we stayed put and we end up getting him later anyhow.
"The train is leaving the station."
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

both Rock, you pass up the best player on most peoples boards, and then you blow your whole draft but picking someone that would've been there in the 2nd round. No way in hell is Matthews worth 3 picks

"dhazer" wrote:



This is getting ridiculous. Clay Matthews would not of been their in the second round. He was a first round player on everyone's radar. You can say they gave up to much and I'd agree although the trade chart says the Packers got the better end of the deal, but to say Clay Matthews would of absolutely been their in round two is giving out poor information.

They had to deal up for him.

The question is did they give up to much and did they end up addressing their needs with their later picks and make up for the loss of two thirds.




The answer to both is probably yes to both.

"porky88" wrote:





Yo guys are right according to Mel Kiper but then again your wrong about the main thing and that is our team must really suck because Kiper says we got 5 starters from the draft. So if we are such a great team how the hell do you get 5 starters from the draft? He says The Blob will start at NT and the man of 3 will start at LB and the 2 OT's will start along with the FB. But your right we filled all our holes like we do every year.

"dhazer" wrote:



I heard Mel Kiper and what he said was the two OT's could EVENTUALLY become starters. He never said they would start or even see the field this year. J.T. Lang is a nasty converted defensive lineman with a lot of upside and Kiper never said they guy would compete for starting spot in '09.
"The train is leaving the station."
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Well that is 3 for 1 if you don't count Meredith as the 2nd 5th round pick. ::roll:
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago
5 starters is a projection down the road. I think maybe four, but the two offensive lineman aren't both going to start right away.

They got two probably right out of the gate.
http://www.row12.com/ 
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

We got their 1st and a 5th for our 2nd and two 3rds.

"wpr" wrote:



Well that is 3 for 1 if you don't count Meredith as the 2nd 5th round pick. ::roll:

"SlickVision" wrote:



Why would you not count the pick they gave back in the 5th?


When your scheduled for 9 picks entering the draft and end up with eight and only made one trade that involved picks how can that trade add up to losing more than one pick?
"The train is leaving the station."
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (4h) : The winners page that is
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
    beast (5h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (5h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (5h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
    Zero2Cool (5h) : congrats beast on 2024 !
    Zero2Cool (5h) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : That might be it for the Vikings
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
    Martha Careful (18h) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
    Zero2Cool (18h) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : BALL DON'T LIE
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
    Zero2Cool (19h) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
    Zero2Cool (20h) : 4 td for Rodgers
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Chiefs got shutout
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : "The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Owner ... love it
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Mayo was the guy they groomed for HC and one of the reasons they let Bill go.
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : Pats have the #4 pick, lots of cap space and Maye at QB; should fetch some attention
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : Well that didn't take long; Jerod Mayo out as Patriots HC
    Zero2Cool (23h) : I would expect it to be higher in favor of Eagles
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Thst line seems...generous
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Eagles -3.5 over Packers in Wildcard Round
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Did it though? Pokes beat the Commanders on the road with Cooper Rush previously
    Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : That gives them their best chance
    Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!
    Mucky Tundra (4-Jan) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year
    Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
    Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
    beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
    dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
    dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    31m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    7h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    3-Jan / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

    2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.