Posts from another thread, split by Zero· Page 7

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#62

Geez...every thread turns into a pissing contest.
Once again, just like the rest of the country, "ME FIRST and SCREW YOU!"

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#63

So you have said,
1) You can form objective opinions
2) While Homers can’t form objective opinions
3) And objectivity is better than no objectivity
Therefor you are saying you’re physically able to form better opinions, while homers are NOT physically able to.

And if one is physically able to do something (say win) that makes them better than those who can’t… does it not?

So many times, you have implied that you are BETTER than Homers!
But according to you who is a homer?

Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Originally Posted by: beast

Are you ever going to comprehend and stipulate to what the definition of a homer is? What is a homer to you? This is where all your belligerence emanates. You don't like a term that I didn't make up that speaks to many on this forum.

What does the word "homer" in the context of this board mean? Once you give your answer maybe we can build some bridges?

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#64

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You keep saying I don't like the term, there is nothing wrong with the term. The term doesn't matter... not at all... the term could be "x" for all I care...

What matters is you said most of the board is "x", and that you are better than "x"

You won't own up to that fact!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#65

I don't mind being called a homer. I like the Brewers, Badgers and Bucks because they are within my home state. If I was born elsewhere, I would still root for the Packers because I got hooked on the tradition and lengthy history. That's why I like the Red Sox. I like the Penguins because my dad talked about them and the more I watched them play, the more I liked Mario. And then Sidney came along. I also like the Gamblers for homer reasons, they are my local Hockey team.

If anyone has a problem with me being a homer, they can go fuck themselves raw and bleed out.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#66

Originally Posted by: beast

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Do I think I'm more knowledgeable than most? Absolutely. Better? Never.

You don't like to answer questions and endeavor to control the narrative here. This would've been put to bed had you embraced my post with the definition of a homer and just apologized for your years of misunderstanding. You're not a big enough person to do that, though. I think it's you who strongly desires to feel better than me but really doesn't. No reason for you to stay after this. The word means what it means and I stand by what I've said on the subject from years ago to this thread. Consistent all day every day just like your misunderstanding and childish inability to let this go.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#67

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

I could be wrong, but this seems to be nicer than some of the other things we've said to each other. Which did get locked or modified.

Why not attempted to keep this on a single thread instead of locking it and moving it to even more threads?

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#68

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#69

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

Originally Posted by: beast

Your 2 and 2 isn't equaling 4, though.

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#70

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Not really, if you not better (which you're not)
then your objective has built-in biases which
blocks you, like everyone else on here.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (6h) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh

dfosterf (17h) : Happy Birthday Dave!

Mucky Tundra (18h) : happy birthday dhazer

TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later

buckeyepackfan (20h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!

buckeyepackfan (20h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.

packerfanoutwest (20h) : well, he was

TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL

Mucky Tundra (21h) : I think this games over

beast (21h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (21h) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22