Posts from another thread, split by Zero· Page 7

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#62

Geez...every thread turns into a pissing contest.
Once again, just like the rest of the country, "ME FIRST and SCREW YOU!"

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#63

So you have said,
1) You can form objective opinions
2) While Homers can’t form objective opinions
3) And objectivity is better than no objectivity
Therefor you are saying you’re physically able to form better opinions, while homers are NOT physically able to.

And if one is physically able to do something (say win) that makes them better than those who can’t… does it not?

So many times, you have implied that you are BETTER than Homers!
But according to you who is a homer?

Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Originally Posted by: beast

Are you ever going to comprehend and stipulate to what the definition of a homer is? What is a homer to you? This is where all your belligerence emanates. You don't like a term that I didn't make up that speaks to many on this forum.

What does the word "homer" in the context of this board mean? Once you give your answer maybe we can build some bridges?

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#64

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You keep saying I don't like the term, there is nothing wrong with the term. The term doesn't matter... not at all... the term could be "x" for all I care...

What matters is you said most of the board is "x", and that you are better than "x"

You won't own up to that fact!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#65

I don't mind being called a homer. I like the Brewers, Badgers and Bucks because they are within my home state. If I was born elsewhere, I would still root for the Packers because I got hooked on the tradition and lengthy history. That's why I like the Red Sox. I like the Penguins because my dad talked about them and the more I watched them play, the more I liked Mario. And then Sidney came along. I also like the Gamblers for homer reasons, they are my local Hockey team.

If anyone has a problem with me being a homer, they can go fuck themselves raw and bleed out.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#66

Originally Posted by: beast

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Do I think I'm more knowledgeable than most? Absolutely. Better? Never.

You don't like to answer questions and endeavor to control the narrative here. This would've been put to bed had you embraced my post with the definition of a homer and just apologized for your years of misunderstanding. You're not a big enough person to do that, though. I think it's you who strongly desires to feel better than me but really doesn't. No reason for you to stay after this. The word means what it means and I stand by what I've said on the subject from years ago to this thread. Consistent all day every day just like your misunderstanding and childish inability to let this go.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#67

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

I could be wrong, but this seems to be nicer than some of the other things we've said to each other. Which did get locked or modified.

Why not attempted to keep this on a single thread instead of locking it and moving it to even more threads?

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#68

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#69

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

Originally Posted by: beast

Your 2 and 2 isn't equaling 4, though.

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#70

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Not really, if you not better (which you're not)
then your objective has built-in biases which
blocks you, like everyone else on here.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (12h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (18h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (22h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS