Posts from another thread, split by Zero· Page 7

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#62

Geez...every thread turns into a pissing contest.
Once again, just like the rest of the country, "ME FIRST and SCREW YOU!"

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#63

So you have said,
1) You can form objective opinions
2) While Homers can’t form objective opinions
3) And objectivity is better than no objectivity
Therefor you are saying you’re physically able to form better opinions, while homers are NOT physically able to.

And if one is physically able to do something (say win) that makes them better than those who can’t… does it not?

So many times, you have implied that you are BETTER than Homers!
But according to you who is a homer?

Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Originally Posted by: beast

Are you ever going to comprehend and stipulate to what the definition of a homer is? What is a homer to you? This is where all your belligerence emanates. You don't like a term that I didn't make up that speaks to many on this forum.

What does the word "homer" in the context of this board mean? Once you give your answer maybe we can build some bridges?

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#64

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You keep saying I don't like the term, there is nothing wrong with the term. The term doesn't matter... not at all... the term could be "x" for all I care...

What matters is you said most of the board is "x", and that you are better than "x"

You won't own up to that fact!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#65

I don't mind being called a homer. I like the Brewers, Badgers and Bucks because they are within my home state. If I was born elsewhere, I would still root for the Packers because I got hooked on the tradition and lengthy history. That's why I like the Red Sox. I like the Penguins because my dad talked about them and the more I watched them play, the more I liked Mario. And then Sidney came along. I also like the Gamblers for homer reasons, they are my local Hockey team.

If anyone has a problem with me being a homer, they can go fuck themselves raw and bleed out.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#66

Originally Posted by: beast

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Do I think I'm more knowledgeable than most? Absolutely. Better? Never.

You don't like to answer questions and endeavor to control the narrative here. This would've been put to bed had you embraced my post with the definition of a homer and just apologized for your years of misunderstanding. You're not a big enough person to do that, though. I think it's you who strongly desires to feel better than me but really doesn't. No reason for you to stay after this. The word means what it means and I stand by what I've said on the subject from years ago to this thread. Consistent all day every day just like your misunderstanding and childish inability to let this go.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#67

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

I could be wrong, but this seems to be nicer than some of the other things we've said to each other. Which did get locked or modified.

Why not attempted to keep this on a single thread instead of locking it and moving it to even more threads?

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#68

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#69

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

Originally Posted by: beast

Your 2 and 2 isn't equaling 4, though.

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#70

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Not really, if you not better (which you're not)
then your objective has built-in biases which
blocks you, like everyone else on here.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (29m) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (8h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (8h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (8h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (8h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (9h) : Who? What?

beast (18h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (22h) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24