PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
Well by your own definition and your posting you are a Homer UFFDA, just in a different direction. If you read your own post objectively you might see that.

None of us actually know what goes on in the Packers organization, everything we post is opinion, just because other see things different then you doesn't make them wrong and you right.

Personally I have been wrong once in my life. And that was when I stated that I sometimes make mistakes.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Well by your own definition and your posting you are a Homer UFFDA, just in a different direction. If you read your own post objectively you might see that.

None of us actually know what goes on in the Packers organization, everything we post is opinion, just because other see things different then you doesn't make them wrong and you right.

Personally I have been wrong once in my life. And that was when I stated that I sometimes make mistakes.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Homer in a different direction? 🙂. That's some liberty there. 🙂.

beast asked me a question. I'd like to say objective connotes fairness and I believe fair is better than unfair. Unfair is exactly the reaction I receive to my honest attempts at fairness and balance to what we see here.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

In the end all you have done is say your better than others. (Because being more objective is better, is it not?).

Originally Posted by: beast 



Is being more objective better?

It's a simple question...

My problem is that you keep implying that your better than others and your false claims that you are being attack due to your viewpoint instead of the real reason, your condescending tone that you write with.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Homer in a different direction? 🙂. That's some liberty there. 🙂.

beast asked me a question. I'd like to say objective connotes fairness and I believe fair is better than unfair. Unfair is exactly the reaction I receive to my honest attempts at fairness and balance to what we see here.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Objectivity is good, except when it's used as superiority.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Is being more objective better?

It's a simple question...

My problem is that you keep implying that your better than others and your false claims that you are being attack due to your viewpoint instead of the real reason, your condescending tone that you write with.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You keep thinking you are objective and you are not any more than anybody else. You think Hundley is terrible, everything you post about that subject is slanted towards that belief. You want the team to be blown up and rebuilt, your posts about that are all slanted towards that opinion.

Having strong beliefs or opinions on a subject which you yourself claim, is completely contrary to objectivity.




The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

Can we agree that how you define homer and what you feel it connotes is critical to this particular debate about whether someone is a big mean bully trying to belittle certain posters?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



No.
I didn't read the rest of your comment.

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

You keep thinking you are objective and you are not any more than anybody else. You think Hundley is terrible, everything you post about that subject is slanted towards that belief. You want the team to be blown up and rebuilt, your posts about that are all slanted towards that opinion.

Having strong beliefs or opinions on a subject which you yourself claim, is completely contrary to objectivity.



Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



? Go read what I wrote about Hundley before he actually started a game for us. I was looking forward to him recalling the dynamic player from his first pre-season. He was as impressive a player that I'd seen in many years. He never looked that good ever again, and has really looked awful in his recent starts.

I would agree that OPINIONS are hard to objectify in some cases. Let's look at one such instance that is coming to mind... during the off-season there was buzz about our defense being a lot better. Even Barfarn was on here saying it would be Top 10 or was it 5 by end of the season? I didn't ridicule him, I told him why I thought that was an odd opinion after seeing what little the team had done to fix it's CB woes. I took heat about my negativity for giving my opinion. Why do you think I took heat? Do you not think that a homer wants to believe the defense would be better, after all, it has Ted picking players for it and he's the best GM in the league, right? I chose to focus on the "fix" and say why it was going to kill our season yet again. Was that opinion wrong? Packers D is ranked 25th right now. We've all seen the CB play. Atrocious. However, I got blasted for my "negativity". I would say it was my ability to be objective that allowed me to form an opinion closer to the reality that we've all seen than that of the homer view that things were going to be better. Homer leanings led to a skewed opinion that has turned out to be wrong. I feel like my ability to be objective really helped me get it right about our defense but somehow it gets taken to weird extremes about what my methodology is here.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

You keep thinking you are objective and you are not any more than anybody else. You think Hundley is terrible, everything you post about that subject is slanted towards that belief. You want the team to be blown up and rebuilt, your posts about that are all slanted towards that opinion.

Having strong beliefs or opinions on a subject which you yourself claim, is completely contrary to objectivity.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


Right, to be objectivity one most be open minded...

A homer (the way it's often being used here) is not objectivity because they aren't open minded against the people on the team. Uffda, like-wise is not objectivity because he is not open minded towards the people on the team. Neither is objective.

And none of us are completely objective because we all have personal biases.
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

at least you are not called a Marge.

Doh.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6h) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (17h) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (20h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (21h) : I think this games over
beast (22h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (22h) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.