Posts from another thread, split by Zero· Page 6

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

7 years ago

Well by your own definition and your posting you are a Homer UFFDA, just in a different direction. If you read your own post objectively you might see that.

None of us actually know what goes on in the Packers organization, everything we post is opinion, just because other see things different then you doesn't make them wrong and you right.

Personally I have been wrong once in my life. And that was when I stated that I sometimes make mistakes.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#52

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Homer in a different direction? 🙂. That's some liberty there. 🙂.

beast asked me a question. I'd like to say objective connotes fairness and I believe fair is better than unfair. Unfair is exactly the reaction I receive to my honest attempts at fairness and balance to what we see here.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#53

In the end all you have done is say your better than others. (Because being more objective is better, is it not?).

Originally Posted by: beast

Is being more objective better?

It's a simple question...

My problem is that you keep implying that your better than others and your false claims that you are being attack due to your viewpoint instead of the real reason, your condescending tone that you write with.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

7 years ago

#54

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Objectivity is good, except when it's used as superiority.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#55

Originally Posted by: beast

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#56

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You keep thinking you are objective and you are not any more than anybody else. You think Hundley is terrible, everything you post about that subject is slanted towards that belief. You want the team to be blown up and rebuilt, your posts about that are all slanted towards that opinion.

Having strong beliefs or opinions on a subject which you yourself claim, is completely contrary to objectivity.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#57

Can we agree that how you define homer and what you feel it connotes is critical to this particular debate about whether someone is a big mean bully trying to belittle certain posters?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

No.
I didn't read the rest of your comment.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#58

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

? Go read what I wrote about Hundley before he actually started a game for us. I was looking forward to him recalling the dynamic player from his first pre-season. He was as impressive a player that I'd seen in many years. He never looked that good ever again, and has really looked awful in his recent starts.

I would agree that OPINIONS are hard to objectify in some cases. Let's look at one such instance that is coming to mind... during the off-season there was buzz about our defense being a lot better. Even Barfarn was on here saying it would be Top 10 or was it 5 by end of the season? I didn't ridicule him, I told him why I thought that was an odd opinion after seeing what little the team had done to fix it's CB woes. I took heat about my negativity for giving my opinion. Why do you think I took heat? Do you not think that a homer wants to believe the defense would be better, after all, it has Ted picking players for it and he's the best GM in the league, right? I chose to focus on the "fix" and say why it was going to kill our season yet again. Was that opinion wrong? Packers D is ranked 25th right now. We've all seen the CB play. Atrocious. However, I got blasted for my "negativity". I would say it was my ability to be objective that allowed me to form an opinion closer to the reality that we've all seen than that of the homer view that things were going to be better. Homer leanings led to a skewed opinion that has turned out to be wrong. I feel like my ability to be objective really helped me get it right about our defense but somehow it gets taken to weird extremes about what my methodology is here.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#59

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Right, to be objectivity one most be open minded...

A homer (the way it's often being used here) is not objectivity because they aren't open minded against the people on the team. Uffda, like-wise is not objectivity because he is not open minded towards the people on the team. Neither is objective.

And none of us are completely objective because we all have personal biases.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#60

at least you are not called a Marge.

Doh.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (12h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (18h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (22h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS