Packers release James Starks· Page 5

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

I don't see what there is to complain about.

Originally Posted by: musccy

Is he complaining... or is he bragging? That he was right that something negative would happen, and everyone else is wrong.

The complaint is simple, it's the same with all of his post... he's complaining that people view the Packers leadership as leaders and don't view him as a leader for the correct way things should be done.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

#42

Originally Posted by: beast

Wpr... I think beast is hoping you'll lock this down as he, again, is more interested in me than football discussion.

The nonsense is tiring.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#43

I swear that some of these threads are like political discussions where if one person says something then others have to choose the opposite side just to disagree and troll people. It's fucking annoying.

Starks should have been cut during the season before he had his car accident. He was absolutely terrible. He got his nice contract because Ted overpaid and Lacy is totally unreliable to keep his weight in check.

Thanks for the great games during our Super Bowl run, but really it was time to move on.

nerdmann
Premier Member

8 years ago

#44

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

He had lost a step, but was solid in pass pro.

Mike likes his RBs big and slow.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

musccy
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#45

4.1 ypc? The definition of average?
I'm not crazy not alone on this.
Because nobody will actually look, I'll make it easy. Here's the comments on Rodney's tweet to the overpay of Starks:

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I feel like you're treating this as some earth-shattering deal. I think the cap hit was 2.75M last year from him and it was coming off a fairly productive 2015. 1.5% of the cap, that's it. I get it, Starks sucked horribly last year, but I just don't see why it was all that bad of a signing at the time. It really didn't handicap the organization in any appreciable way. You want to bring up Hawk or CM3's contracts, fine but this particular contract IMO wasn't that big of a deal.

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

#46

Wpr... I think beast is hoping you'll lock this down as he, again, is more interested in me than football discussion.

The nonsense is tiring.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Awe, he's crying to daddy... isn't that cute.

But I made these post well before I read WPR comment about lock down... but no I don't want this post locked down... it shows how far you're willing to go to bitch... taking a very minor contract and making sound like we gave him 10 million or something.

It also shows how you're a hypocrite... as you bitch when Thompson does something, just as you bitch when Thompson does nothing.... fact is, no matter what happens, you're going to bitch about Thompson.

You want change... but are you going to be happy with the change you get? For a honeymoon period yes... but then you'll go back to being the same... and wanting more change... because they don't do what you want.

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

#47

Starks should have been cut during the season before he had his car accident. He was absolutely terrible. He got his nice contract because Ted overpaid and Lacy is totally unreliable to keep his weight in check.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Also because Starks had a decent year last year.

He had lost a step, but was solid in pass pro.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Yeah I think that's the only reason they hung onto Starks this season was because they didn't fully trust anyone else in pass protection... and knew Starks could be trusted in pass protection if he could get healthy.

Originally Posted by: musccy

Exactly, this thread was simply a troll setting his bait from the start...
Which is why it was pointless to talk about it.

Stark's low value contract isn't that big of a deal either way...

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#48

Also because Starks had a decent year last year.

Originally Posted by: beast

He was the 21st highest paid RB.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/rankings/2016/average/running-back/

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#49

Some people are just going to whine. Had Ted not signed Starks when Lacy got hurt all we would have been hearing from the resident arm chair GMs is how could Ted not have a proven backup behind Lacy. Basically the exact same thing they are saying about Hayward.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

#50

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Exactly... no matter what happens the troll will whine...

If a player gets resigned: Ted paid too much
If a player doesn't resign: Ted couldn't sign him

As of last season, Starks got 993 combined (rushing/catching) yards, knew the system, could pass protect well and was versatile. For a team that didn't know if they could trust their #1 guy to be in shape, that seemed like some protection at the time.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (9h) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals

Zero2Cool (9h) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy

Zero2Cool (9h) : No sir. I did not.

dfosterf (10h) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?

wpr (10h) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.

dfosterf (11h) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it

Zero2Cool (11h) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty

wpr (12h) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.

Mucky Tundra (12h) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?

Zero2Cool (13h) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that

Zero2Cool (13h) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute

wpr (16h) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.

wpr (16h) : The site is much more better.

Zero2Cool (16h) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?

Zero2Cool (16h) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.

dfosterf (16h) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo

Zero2Cool (16h) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.

Zero2Cool (17h) : Other times, it's turtle ass

Zero2Cool (17h) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.

beast (18h) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.

beast (18h) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!

beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end

Zero2Cool (18h) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?

wpr (18h) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.

Zero2Cool (19h) : SSL might be settled now.

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues

wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.

dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev

Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.

Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last

Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.

Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : But when I go it, Martha's is the last reply

Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Still a little screwy; it shows on the main forum that you were the last person to reply to the Jenkins trade thread

Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Host issues, been crazy day

Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Connect 4?

Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Connecting to new database

Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : What the hell

beast (22-Jul) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again

Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops

Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with

Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery

Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷

dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings

Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more

Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!

dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old

dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason

dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2025 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM

COMMANDERS

Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM

Browns

Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM

Cowboys

Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM

BENGALS

Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM

Cardinals

Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM

Steelers

Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM

PANTHERS

Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM

EAGLES

Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM

Giants

Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM

Bears

Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM

RAVENS

Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM

Vikings