Ahhh... clarification of your point which is correct.. as that Harrell was signed near the end of the 2010 QB school in which you speak. Why didn't you just say QB school. [grin1]
Show Spoiler
In a few months, Graham Harrell will get his long-awaited chance to become a “student” in Mike McCarthy’s quarterback school.
Through no fault of his own, Harrell hasn’t had that opportunity in his two seasons with the Packers. He was originally signed late in May of 2010, after QB school was mostly done and the offseason program had moved on to OTAs. Then last year, there was no offseason program at all due to the lockout.
Now we could debate that two plus seasons of work are a benefit to a QB... meaning weekly film sessions, game planning and grind type work. I think is of great benefit.. probably greater than the QB school. But the is subjective to each of our opinion of its value.
IMO, the real question for the Packers at QB is does Coleman stick?
My opinion, we have a ton of potential in this years rookie class.. some at real needs short and long term. But I think Coleman has all the tools to play in this league.. do they risk loosing him to a claim or chew up a valuable spot for another position or another more ready option at QB?
Tough call for say a Levine or Richardson type player in a position of uncertainty for the Packers.
Coleman makeup (film rat) and physical talents make him to intriging to me with Mike McCarthy & company as a mentor. But that is just me..
Originally Posted by: Pack93z