bboystyle
14 years ago

I'll just say this: I would not be surprised if many heterosexual men think of Aaron Rodgers while making love to their partner(s).

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:




in a similar way,the other day i was making love to my girl and they showed the highlights of the Packers/Colts game and i couldnt help but stop for a few seconds to see Rodgers highlights of that game...My girl got pissed and shoved me off her which was fine by me cuz now i can have all my attention on chico and his god like presence on my tv...
bboystyle
14 years ago
Right now,Rodgers is the most clutch QB in the league which is why people would take him over manning,brady,ect...He's ungodly on the hardest down in football(3rd),it doesnt get more clutch then that...Last years playoff game was just a sample for Rodgers...Now hat he has been there,he will conquer!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Wow, based on?
blank
longtimefan
14 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Wow, based on?

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



His opinion?
DakotaT
14 years ago



Either way I don't care about the Pats, but Brady has nothing to do with any of that. At the end of the day, I think its very hard to argue that Brady is not VERY VERY good.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:




Sorry I bunked out of this. Brady is good and has been given all the accolades he needs ad nauseum.

I throw Brady into my systems quarterbacks category with Montana and Young.

Then you have the gunslingers like Marino, Elway, and Favre.

Then you have the highbred guys like Manning and Rodgers.

These are great arguments, but just arguing that one player has rings versus other guys cheapens the argument because some of those guys played on stacked teams, and others had to elevate their game just to get their team to the playoffs. Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson won super bowls, so much for that criteria.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Even a casual glance at Favre's performances in the playoffs the past decade and a half could lead one to the reasoned conclusion that the Packers could conceivably have won more titles had it not been for the repeated meltdowns of their quarterback at the most inopportune times.

Favre is probably the third best regular season quarterback of all time, after Manning and Marino. A great postseason quarterback he is not and never has been. Every time I re-watch the Super Bowl XXXI, it becomes more obvious to me that the Packers won that night not because of Favre's play but because Holmgren kept Favre firmly leashed.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
14 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Wow, based on?

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:




While I think it's impossible to quantify such a statement, one can't say his opinion is anymore false than your possible counter to it. It's just an opinion. None of us really know.
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

Even a casual glance at Favre's performances in the playoffs the past decade and a half could lead one to the reasoned conclusion that the Packers could conceivably have won more titles had it not been for the repeated meltdowns of their quarterback at the most inopportune times.

Favre is probably the third best regular season quarterback of all time, after Manning and Marino. A great postseason quarterback he is not and never has been. Every time I re-watch the Super Bowl XXXI, it becomes more obvious to me that the Packers won that night not because of Favre's play but because Holmgren kept Favre firmly leashed.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Edit, before you pick on my choice of words, I do not mean that you are necessarily one of these "people" mentioned below.

I love how some how people only look at one of side of the coin on the whole Favre playoffs thing.

What if we had a defense that could stop a 4th and 27 against the Eagles?! 4th and 27! Not 4th and 15, not 4th and 20, a 4th and 27. Don't you think we would have likely won that game if we had stopped a 4th and 27.

What about Super Bowl XXXII. Favre threw 3 TDs but the Packers D allowed 157 yards and 3 TDs down to TD. Don't tyou think that we would have likely won that game if we could stop TD?

What about the 49ers-Packers game where Favre gave the Packers the lead with like a minute something left. And some how our defense gave up a horrible drive that ended with Young to TO? I'm pretty sure we would have won that if it wasn't for the D.

Or even the Falcons-Packers game, people keep blaming Favre for it. Favre was a BIG part of the problem but VICK, yes VICK DESTROYED the Packers D, we were NOT winning a SB that year with that D. But people only have selective memories or they never watched those games and look at box scores. Even go to the play by play on NFL.com for that game and you'll see how much Vick destroyed that D.

It goes both ways, Favre blew really good SB possibilities (the Giants-Packers 2007 game) but there were SB yeras were Favre was fine and others blew it. Namely, Super Bowl XXXII and the 49ers-Packers game. I really feel people over-state how good Packers teams were.

Just like Rodgers, yeah it sucks we lost that game against the Cardinals on that play where Rodgers missed Jennings in OT but in the grand scheme, we were NOT winning a SB with that defense.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
the 49ers game we had won, Rice fumbled, stop mentioning that game, we don't need that pain brought up!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (16h) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.