bboystyle
14 years ago

I'll just say this: I would not be surprised if many heterosexual men think of Aaron Rodgers while making love to their partner(s).

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:




in a similar way,the other day i was making love to my girl and they showed the highlights of the Packers/Colts game and i couldnt help but stop for a few seconds to see Rodgers highlights of that game...My girl got pissed and shoved me off her which was fine by me cuz now i can have all my attention on chico and his god like presence on my tv...
bboystyle
14 years ago
Right now,Rodgers is the most clutch QB in the league which is why people would take him over manning,brady,ect...He's ungodly on the hardest down in football(3rd),it doesnt get more clutch then that...Last years playoff game was just a sample for Rodgers...Now hat he has been there,he will conquer!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Wow, based on?
blank
longtimefan
14 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Wow, based on?

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



His opinion?
DakotaT
14 years ago



Either way I don't care about the Pats, but Brady has nothing to do with any of that. At the end of the day, I think its very hard to argue that Brady is not VERY VERY good.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:




Sorry I bunked out of this. Brady is good and has been given all the accolades he needs ad nauseum.

I throw Brady into my systems quarterbacks category with Montana and Young.

Then you have the gunslingers like Marino, Elway, and Favre.

Then you have the highbred guys like Manning and Rodgers.

These are great arguments, but just arguing that one player has rings versus other guys cheapens the argument because some of those guys played on stacked teams, and others had to elevate their game just to get their team to the playoffs. Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson won super bowls, so much for that criteria.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Even a casual glance at Favre's performances in the playoffs the past decade and a half could lead one to the reasoned conclusion that the Packers could conceivably have won more titles had it not been for the repeated meltdowns of their quarterback at the most inopportune times.

Favre is probably the third best regular season quarterback of all time, after Manning and Marino. A great postseason quarterback he is not and never has been. Every time I re-watch the Super Bowl XXXI, it becomes more obvious to me that the Packers won that night not because of Favre's play but because Holmgren kept Favre firmly leashed.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
14 years ago

We didn't lose that game because of Rodgers, we lost it in spite of Rodgers. If our last QB played like him, we would have 3 more super bowls.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Wow, based on?

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:




While I think it's impossible to quantify such a statement, one can't say his opinion is anymore false than your possible counter to it. It's just an opinion. None of us really know.
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

Even a casual glance at Favre's performances in the playoffs the past decade and a half could lead one to the reasoned conclusion that the Packers could conceivably have won more titles had it not been for the repeated meltdowns of their quarterback at the most inopportune times.

Favre is probably the third best regular season quarterback of all time, after Manning and Marino. A great postseason quarterback he is not and never has been. Every time I re-watch the Super Bowl XXXI, it becomes more obvious to me that the Packers won that night not because of Favre's play but because Holmgren kept Favre firmly leashed.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Edit, before you pick on my choice of words, I do not mean that you are necessarily one of these "people" mentioned below.

I love how some how people only look at one of side of the coin on the whole Favre playoffs thing.

What if we had a defense that could stop a 4th and 27 against the Eagles?! 4th and 27! Not 4th and 15, not 4th and 20, a 4th and 27. Don't you think we would have likely won that game if we had stopped a 4th and 27.

What about Super Bowl XXXII. Favre threw 3 TDs but the Packers D allowed 157 yards and 3 TDs down to TD. Don't tyou think that we would have likely won that game if we could stop TD?

What about the 49ers-Packers game where Favre gave the Packers the lead with like a minute something left. And some how our defense gave up a horrible drive that ended with Young to TO? I'm pretty sure we would have won that if it wasn't for the D.

Or even the Falcons-Packers game, people keep blaming Favre for it. Favre was a BIG part of the problem but VICK, yes VICK DESTROYED the Packers D, we were NOT winning a SB that year with that D. But people only have selective memories or they never watched those games and look at box scores. Even go to the play by play on NFL.com for that game and you'll see how much Vick destroyed that D.

It goes both ways, Favre blew really good SB possibilities (the Giants-Packers 2007 game) but there were SB yeras were Favre was fine and others blew it. Namely, Super Bowl XXXII and the 49ers-Packers game. I really feel people over-state how good Packers teams were.

Just like Rodgers, yeah it sucks we lost that game against the Cardinals on that play where Rodgers missed Jennings in OT but in the grand scheme, we were NOT winning a SB with that defense.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
the 49ers game we had won, Rice fumbled, stop mentioning that game, we don't need that pain brought up!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (7h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (9h) : HUMP DAY
beast (9h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (9h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (10h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (10h) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (10h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (10h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (10h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (10h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (10h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (12h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (12h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (12h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (12h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (12h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (12h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.