Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"Django" wrote:




The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"dhazer" wrote:




The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona

"Django" wrote:



All teams that we will have to beat anyway if we want to make a play-off run. Anythign can happen. I think that the Bears and Bengals both proved that last night.

There are some kinks here and there, but apart from the O-line, the team overall wasn't that bad. The defense just had some huge gaps and failed responsibilitie (I think). Especially with both Rouse and Bush in at the safety position. Some early defensive conversion struggles. Maybe the huge playbook is getting up with them. They obviously didn't have to worry about that in the pre-season.

Whatever the reason, they looked out of sync. Especially if you look at the pre-season games and week 1.

The only real problem we have on this team is the one that has been talked about tons of times already, the O-line.
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?
blank
Timmons
15 years ago

The record or this loss really doesn't bother me..

Getting our collective asses kicked along the line of scrimmage on the offensive line for two straight games does.

A emotionless defense does.. probably the most disappointed today with this aspect... oline I sort of expected.. not a "flat" defense past Woodson and Matthews.

"pack93z" wrote:



This sums up our situation perfectly. I'll add that we stole a W from from Bears as well. Realistically, we're 0-2 right now. Any hopes I've had for a good season are officially on vacation with our O line.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




True - I'm giving him too much credit for the Bears game. That was a good-to-great effort from the whole defense. I'm going to stick by my assessment when it comes to the Bengals game, though - he was one of maybe 4 guys who looked ready to play that game.
blank
4PackGirl
15 years ago

knowing the scheme does not beat executing the scheme.


The sixties Packers ran sweeps. They knew it. The defense knew it. THe crowd knew it. Hell, even the Russians knew it!


But nobody could stop it.

Be good at what you do. Do it. then do it agian.

"Trippster" wrote:



AMEN, trippster! focus & execute - that's what these guys get paid to do! and whoever said woodson looked pissed - i agree! he was all OVER the place! i think he felt like it was all on his shoulders. i was hoping he'd fire up the rest but it didn't happen.

oh & can anyone remember the last time we could say "boy, our oline is great & our running game is awesome"??? i can't for the life of me remember thinking that & i've been a fan for 35 freakin years!!!
PackerTraxx
15 years ago

No excuses for this loss. We pretty much got beat in almost every facet of the game yesterday. That being said, I'm not going to throw in the towel after one bad performance.

I think how we come out and play against the Rams will give us a good indication of where this team really is at. They know as much as anyone they need to come out and have a good performance as the Rams are still a pretty bad team.

I'm hoping after these two games though that Thompson is strongly considering picking up the phone and getting Tauscher back in here. He might not be ready to go right off the bat, but it wouldn't hurt to have him finish his rehab with the team in hopes we could possibly get him back after the bye week. Guys like Dietrich-Smith are probably going to be inactive most game days anyways, so cut one of these inactive reserves and get Tauscher in here and ready to play. He certainly can't hurt imo.

"Trippster" wrote:



I ran into Frank Winters (Bag 'o doughnuts) and he said they are talking to Tauscher.

"RainX" wrote:



Games like Sunday are good for Tauscher's future! And his chances of retiring a Packer.

Make that games like the last 2 Sundays.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
longtimefan
15 years ago
once an 8-2 team went to a 0-10 team and the 8-2 team lost..

then went to the SB
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (9h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (9h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (14h) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (14h) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (15h) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (15h) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (15h) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (18h) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    dfosterf (19h) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
    Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
    Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
    dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
    Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
    Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
    Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
    Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
    Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
    beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
    beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
    Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
    Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    18h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    19h / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

    8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.