No need to panic...· Page 6

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#52

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"Django" wrote:

The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#53

"dhazer" wrote:

The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona

"Django" wrote:

All teams that we will have to beat anyway if we want to make a play-off run. Anythign can happen. I think that the Bears and Bengals both proved that last night.

There are some kinks here and there, but apart from the O-line, the team overall wasn't that bad. The defense just had some huge gaps and failed responsibilitie (I think). Especially with both Rouse and Bush in at the safety position. Some early defensive conversion struggles. Maybe the huge playbook is getting up with them. They obviously didn't have to worry about that in the pre-season.

Whatever the reason, they looked out of sync. Especially if you look at the pre-season games and week 1.

The only real problem we have on this team is the one that has been talked about tons of times already, the O-line.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

#54

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

blank

Timmons
Registered

15 years ago

#55

The record or this loss really doesn't bother me..

Getting our collective asses kicked along the line of scrimmage on the offensive line for two straight games does.

A emotionless defense does.. probably the most disappointed today with this aspect... oline I sort of expected.. not a "flat" defense past Woodson and Matthews.

"pack93z" wrote:

This sums up our situation perfectly. I'll add that we stole a W from from Bears as well. Realistically, we're 0-2 right now. Any hopes I've had for a good season are officially on vacation with our O line.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#56

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

#57

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

True - I'm giving him too much credit for the Bears game. That was a good-to-great effort from the whole defense. I'm going to stick by my assessment when it comes to the Bengals game, though - he was one of maybe 4 guys who looked ready to play that game.

blank

4PackGirl
Registered

15 years ago

#58

knowing the scheme does not beat executing the scheme.

The sixties Packers ran sweeps. They knew it. The defense knew it. THe crowd knew it. Hell, even the Russians knew it!

But nobody could stop it.

Be good at what you do. Do it. then do it agian.

"Trippster" wrote:

AMEN, trippster! focus & execute - that's what these guys get paid to do! and whoever said woodson looked pissed - i agree! he was all OVER the place! i think he felt like it was all on his shoulders. i was hoping he'd fire up the rest but it didn't happen.

oh & can anyone remember the last time we could say "boy, our oline is great & our running game is awesome"??? i can't for the life of me remember thinking that & i've been a fan for 35 freakin years!!!

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

15 years ago

#59

No excuses for this loss. We pretty much got beat in almost every facet of the game yesterday. That being said, I'm not going to throw in the towel after one bad performance.

I think how we come out and play against the Rams will give us a good indication of where this team really is at. They know as much as anyone they need to come out and have a good performance as the Rams are still a pretty bad team.

I'm hoping after these two games though that Thompson is strongly considering picking up the phone and getting Tauscher back in here. He might not be ready to go right off the bat, but it wouldn't hurt to have him finish his rehab with the team in hopes we could possibly get him back after the bye week. Guys like Dietrich-Smith are probably going to be inactive most game days anyways, so cut one of these inactive reserves and get Tauscher in here and ready to play. He certainly can't hurt imo.

"Trippster" wrote:

I ran into Frank Winters (Bag 'o doughnuts) and he said they are talking to Tauscher.

"RainX" wrote:

Games like Sunday are good for Tauscher's future! And his chances of retiring a Packer.

Make that games like the last 2 Sundays.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#60

once an 8-2 team went to a 0-10 team and the 8-2 team lost..

then went to the SB

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (2h) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan

beast (2h) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan

Mucky Tundra (4h) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."

Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?

beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*

beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes

go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast

beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one

Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha

go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota

beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th

beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?

beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead

beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18

Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?

beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed

beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!

beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over

packerfanoutwest (29-Dec) : Jets pull Aaron Rodgers for Tyrod Taylor

Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Colts-Giants now a tight one

beast (29-Dec) : Still early, but Giants 14 to 3 over Colts

beast (29-Dec) : With Broncos losing to the Bengals, Colts got to control their destiny for the 7th seed... looks like they're about to give it up

Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : I believe Pickett is starting for Philly

beast (29-Dec) : Is the Eagles QB Hurts playing? I forgot to check

Zero2Cool (29-Dec) : Watson unlikely to play today.

Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Good job gpg!

go.pack.go. (29-Dec) : I figured out the signature thing. I had to find a different hosting website

Zero2Cool (28-Dec) : Packers elevated S Omar Brown.

go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : I tried the [img][/img] but that didn’t work

go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : How do I upload a picture to change my signature? I haven’t done it in years lol. I have the picture but can’t get it to work

Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Saturday NFL games=the season is about to get serious

Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.

buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,

buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games

Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (27-Dec) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS