Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"Django" wrote:




The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"dhazer" wrote:




The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona

"Django" wrote:



All teams that we will have to beat anyway if we want to make a play-off run. Anythign can happen. I think that the Bears and Bengals both proved that last night.

There are some kinks here and there, but apart from the O-line, the team overall wasn't that bad. The defense just had some huge gaps and failed responsibilitie (I think). Especially with both Rouse and Bush in at the safety position. Some early defensive conversion struggles. Maybe the huge playbook is getting up with them. They obviously didn't have to worry about that in the pre-season.

Whatever the reason, they looked out of sync. Especially if you look at the pre-season games and week 1.

The only real problem we have on this team is the one that has been talked about tons of times already, the O-line.
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?
blank
Timmons
15 years ago

The record or this loss really doesn't bother me..

Getting our collective asses kicked along the line of scrimmage on the offensive line for two straight games does.

A emotionless defense does.. probably the most disappointed today with this aspect... oline I sort of expected.. not a "flat" defense past Woodson and Matthews.

"pack93z" wrote:



This sums up our situation perfectly. I'll add that we stole a W from from Bears as well. Realistically, we're 0-2 right now. Any hopes I've had for a good season are officially on vacation with our O line.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




True - I'm giving him too much credit for the Bears game. That was a good-to-great effort from the whole defense. I'm going to stick by my assessment when it comes to the Bengals game, though - he was one of maybe 4 guys who looked ready to play that game.
blank
4PackGirl
15 years ago

knowing the scheme does not beat executing the scheme.


The sixties Packers ran sweeps. They knew it. The defense knew it. THe crowd knew it. Hell, even the Russians knew it!


But nobody could stop it.

Be good at what you do. Do it. then do it agian.

"Trippster" wrote:



AMEN, trippster! focus & execute - that's what these guys get paid to do! and whoever said woodson looked pissed - i agree! he was all OVER the place! i think he felt like it was all on his shoulders. i was hoping he'd fire up the rest but it didn't happen.

oh & can anyone remember the last time we could say "boy, our oline is great & our running game is awesome"??? i can't for the life of me remember thinking that & i've been a fan for 35 freakin years!!!
PackerTraxx
15 years ago

No excuses for this loss. We pretty much got beat in almost every facet of the game yesterday. That being said, I'm not going to throw in the towel after one bad performance.

I think how we come out and play against the Rams will give us a good indication of where this team really is at. They know as much as anyone they need to come out and have a good performance as the Rams are still a pretty bad team.

I'm hoping after these two games though that Thompson is strongly considering picking up the phone and getting Tauscher back in here. He might not be ready to go right off the bat, but it wouldn't hurt to have him finish his rehab with the team in hopes we could possibly get him back after the bye week. Guys like Dietrich-Smith are probably going to be inactive most game days anyways, so cut one of these inactive reserves and get Tauscher in here and ready to play. He certainly can't hurt imo.

"Trippster" wrote:



I ran into Frank Winters (Bag 'o doughnuts) and he said they are talking to Tauscher.

"RainX" wrote:



Games like Sunday are good for Tauscher's future! And his chances of retiring a Packer.

Make that games like the last 2 Sundays.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
longtimefan
15 years ago
once an 8-2 team went to a 0-10 team and the 8-2 team lost..

then went to the SB
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (11h) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (11h) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (11h) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (11h) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (13h) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (13h) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (14h) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (14h) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (17h) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (17h) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (17h) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (17h) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (19h) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (19h) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (19h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (19h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (19h) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (19h) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (20h) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : But when I go it, Martha's is the last reply
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Still a little screwy; it shows on the main forum that you were the last person to reply to the Jenkins trade thread
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Host issues, been crazy day
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Connect 4?
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Connecting to new database
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : What the hell
    beast (22-Jul) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    2h / Around The NFL / beast

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    5h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.