Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"Django" wrote:




The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Losing is never acceptable. Losing at home is pathetic. But, I would prefer they got the stinkers out of the way early, stay in contention and be playing their best football at the end of the season. I'll wait another couple of games before getting panicky.

"dhazer" wrote:




The only problem with looking at it this way is we won't be facing the Rams Browns, Bengals, but more like Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Arizona

"Django" wrote:



All teams that we will have to beat anyway if we want to make a play-off run. Anythign can happen. I think that the Bears and Bengals both proved that last night.

There are some kinks here and there, but apart from the O-line, the team overall wasn't that bad. The defense just had some huge gaps and failed responsibilitie (I think). Especially with both Rouse and Bush in at the safety position. Some early defensive conversion struggles. Maybe the huge playbook is getting up with them. They obviously didn't have to worry about that in the pre-season.

Whatever the reason, they looked out of sync. Especially if you look at the pre-season games and week 1.

The only real problem we have on this team is the one that has been talked about tons of times already, the O-line.
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?
blank
Timmons
15 years ago

The record or this loss really doesn't bother me..

Getting our collective asses kicked along the line of scrimmage on the offensive line for two straight games does.

A emotionless defense does.. probably the most disappointed today with this aspect... oline I sort of expected.. not a "flat" defense past Woodson and Matthews.

"pack93z" wrote:



This sums up our situation perfectly. I'll add that we stole a W from from Bears as well. Realistically, we're 0-2 right now. Any hopes I've had for a good season are officially on vacation with our O line.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

Totally - I don't think he was planning on having to carry the whole team on his back. Take away Woodson and this team is a woeful-looking 0-2 club.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How did Woodson win the game for us against Chicago?
Jennings?
Rodgers?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, how many short fields did those turnovers give our offense? If I'm recalling correctly, at least a couple of the - what, four - touchdowns have come as a result of a short field provided by the defense's turnovers. I credit him with 14 points, yesterday's game.

Not saying Rodgers/Jennings didn't have a lot to do with it, but without the turnovers perhaps that play doesn't win the game, but only makes it close?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I'm not trying to discredit Woodson's play in the Bears game, but to say he's the reason we won is inaccurate. Williams, Harris, Jolly and Collins had interceptions.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




True - I'm giving him too much credit for the Bears game. That was a good-to-great effort from the whole defense. I'm going to stick by my assessment when it comes to the Bengals game, though - he was one of maybe 4 guys who looked ready to play that game.
blank
4PackGirl
15 years ago

knowing the scheme does not beat executing the scheme.


The sixties Packers ran sweeps. They knew it. The defense knew it. THe crowd knew it. Hell, even the Russians knew it!


But nobody could stop it.

Be good at what you do. Do it. then do it agian.

"Trippster" wrote:



AMEN, trippster! focus & execute - that's what these guys get paid to do! and whoever said woodson looked pissed - i agree! he was all OVER the place! i think he felt like it was all on his shoulders. i was hoping he'd fire up the rest but it didn't happen.

oh & can anyone remember the last time we could say "boy, our oline is great & our running game is awesome"??? i can't for the life of me remember thinking that & i've been a fan for 35 freakin years!!!
PackerTraxx
15 years ago

No excuses for this loss. We pretty much got beat in almost every facet of the game yesterday. That being said, I'm not going to throw in the towel after one bad performance.

I think how we come out and play against the Rams will give us a good indication of where this team really is at. They know as much as anyone they need to come out and have a good performance as the Rams are still a pretty bad team.

I'm hoping after these two games though that Thompson is strongly considering picking up the phone and getting Tauscher back in here. He might not be ready to go right off the bat, but it wouldn't hurt to have him finish his rehab with the team in hopes we could possibly get him back after the bye week. Guys like Dietrich-Smith are probably going to be inactive most game days anyways, so cut one of these inactive reserves and get Tauscher in here and ready to play. He certainly can't hurt imo.

"Trippster" wrote:



I ran into Frank Winters (Bag 'o doughnuts) and he said they are talking to Tauscher.

"RainX" wrote:



Games like Sunday are good for Tauscher's future! And his chances of retiring a Packer.

Make that games like the last 2 Sundays.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
longtimefan
15 years ago
once an 8-2 team went to a 0-10 team and the 8-2 team lost..

then went to the SB
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : HUMP DAY
    beast (5h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
    beast (5h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I could be wrong there though
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
    beast (5h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
    Zero2Cool (5h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
    Zero2Cool (5h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
    beast (7h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
    beast (7h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
    beast (7h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
    beast (21h) : Cowboys denied Bears request
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
    Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18h / Around The NFL / beast

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

    7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.