TheEngineer
15 years ago
Cheesey, you disparage science with many claims of inaccuracy - perhaps you might want to cite sources.

I'd like to see where exactly "Carbon dating has been PROVEN inaccurate."
blank
Cheesey
15 years ago

Cheesey, you disparage science with many claims of inaccuracy - perhaps you might want to cite sources.

I'd like to see where exactly "Carbon dating has been PROVEN inaccurate."

"TheEngineer" wrote:


I'll try to find it for you.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
15 years ago
Here's one that brings up alot of information. It's alot to read, but try reading it with an open mind. I think you'll find out some things you didn't know.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible 

Here is another one who believes in evolution, and the responses to him.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/05/11/feedback-devoid-of-evidence 
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago

This means that the biosphere just prior to the Flood might have had 500 times more carbon



If that were the case



When the Flood is taken into account along with the decay of the magnetic field, it is reasonable to believe



I am trying to comprehend that article, really sick today so hard to truly concentrate..but reading it I found the quotes I posted interesting..

Are they just "assuming" things to fit their theory? Cuz that is what I am gathering from it INITIALLY..

I am going to re-read it again and maybe I am missing something

FYI**************

I am not trying to be sarcastic, nor trying to be a dick, but I am honestly questioning those quotes.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Hope ya get better LTF.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
15 years ago


They also show a display where white moths flourished, and most of the trees in the area are white birch trees. Then a factory moved in, and blew soot out, which covered the white trees with black soot. In a short time, guess what happened? There were very few white moths, and lots of black ones! POOF! The moths evolved! (Thats what the display says, this PROVED evolution) Now, lets see. White colored moths, and black colored moths. Where is the evolution? Both are what? 100% MOTH. Here is the explanation of what REALLY is the case. White and black moths were born in equal numbers all along! Both colors were in their DNA! If you put a BLACK moth onto a white tree, and it's next to a white moth, which one stands out more? Which one is more likely to be seen by birds and other predators? Now change the color of the trees to black.....NOW which color moth stands out?

"Cheesey" wrote:





I am very interested in all this..Never really looked into any of the creation/evolution stuff..

So decided to do some re-search today as no one is home and i feel like a sick dog..
\
This is what i put into google

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=rnE&ei=zAGsSpeuNIHKlAfS1PTLBg&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=unbiased+article+on+evolution&spell=1 


2nd link was this

Article about the moth Alan is talking about 

Alan, your moths were being eaten more no doubt..but the guy that witnessed that was placing the moths on the trunks of the trees..

In truth, however, there were problems with Kettlewell's experiments. Perhaps the most significant was that he released moths onto tree trunks.

Although moths occasionally choose trunks as a daytime resting place, they prefer the underside of branches. Kettlewell also let his moths go during the day, even though they normally choose their resting place at night. And he released more moths than would naturally be present in an area, which may have made them more conspicuous and tempted birds to eat them even if they wouldn't normally.



I admit this stuff does fascinate me..As a kid growing up and talking religion classes in junior high before being confirmed I often thought to myself..When we die how weird is it going to be to live forever...

I am a believer in GOD but my mind also needs evidence to believe in something..On the surface it appears there is more evidence to support the science part of all this..But there are many layers to the entire debate..

I am not trying to bunch Alan's panties to rile him up, but trying to find evidence of both sides..
longtimefan
15 years ago
Could it be GOD is making things to evolve?

He knows something needs to fix with something and allows it to evolve itself?

That would explain both sides


:thumbright:
Cheesey
15 years ago
God doesn't NEED evolution. He does it right the first time.
And, if we evolved, why wouldn't HE just say so?
As far as the moth thing LT....i KNEW the guy faked it. Which i probably SHOULD have brought up. But i was only trying to show how that was used as "proof" as evolution in the Milwaukee Public Museum. Being as the guy faked it in the first place, even shows just how far people will go to try to "prove" evolution. They will lie, make up stuff and say it's all true. I'd say that proves my point even more so. Heck, it didn't stop the museum from using that display. They even had one showing the supposed "evolution" of horses. Of course it goes from a little horse looking creature, to the horse we know today. What they don't say is that the fossils they were using to build this supposed progression didn't occur in the fossil record in the order they show in the display. Just another "fudging" of truth to fit their already made up conclusion.

And God doesn't get things wrong, so why would he have to create something that needed to "fix" itself?
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
15 years ago

This means that the biosphere just prior to the Flood might have had 500 times more carbon

"longtimefan" wrote:



If that were the case



When the Flood is taken into account along with the decay of the magnetic field, it is reasonable to believe



I am trying to comprehend that article, really sick today so hard to truly concentrate..but reading it I found the quotes I posted interesting..

Are they just "assuming" things to fit their theory? Cuz that is what I am gathering from it INITIALLY..

I am going to re-read it again and maybe I am missing something

FYI**************

I am not trying to be sarcastic, nor trying to be a dick, but I am honestly questioning those quotes.


Lets see....it's ok for evolution to "assume" that everything was back in history as it is now. And they use carbon dating as if they know for certain everything WAS as it is now. Have you ever seen the bugs trapped in "amber"? (It is in the movie "Jurassic Park") That part was not faked, they have found bubbles of tree sap "amber" like that. Of course they haven't been able to create dinosaurs. But in real life, when they drill into the amber, the trapped air has oxygen levels MUCH higher then we have now. That shows that the conditions were not like they are now. That alone leaves wonder of these "measuring sticks" they use today.
Plus, if you read up on carbon dating, it shows that you can only go back so far and you are trying to measure something that really can't be measured. So you can make it find whatever number you want it to show.

Don't feel too bad LT.....I'm not feeling at all well today either. Spent most of my day in the bathroom. NOT fun!
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago
It doesn't necessarily need a fix, but it adapts to new situations. Something that would make perfect sense to me, whether you're an athiest or a christian.

I think that it's pretty obvious that evolution is real. Generations of any being always seem to adapt to circumstances. Small things that are pretty obvious, even, like dogs missing the claw further up their leg or people just getting bigger. The body itsself evolves during a lifespan. From little things as building up immunities to diseases from, obviously getting older. It perfects itsself, if you will, if you're a tabula rasa guy.

That doesn't mean that there is no God who created mankind and what not in the first place. From what I've heared, the biggest missing link is still that between nothing and a cell. A cell has quite a few parts, something which, for as far as I know but I could be wrong here, still has no explenation.

I think that they go hand in hand pretty well.
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (4h) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
Mucky Tundra (4h) : that contained all prospects info and contact
Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
Zero2Cool (5h) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
beast (5h) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
beast (5h) : I'm going with Jax Ulbrich is not telling the whole truth... he accidentally came across it? Why would a defensive coordinator have a QB #?
Zero2Cool (6h) : He's not that great, but final piece of the script.\
Zero2Cool (6h) : If we add Isaiah Simmons, book your Super Bowl tickets
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Colts 1st round TE Tyler Warren also got prank called, was that Jax Ulbrich as well?
Zero2Cool (6h) : Jax Ulbrich, Jeff Ulbrich’s son, released an apology for his role in the Shedeur Sanders prank call.
Martha Careful (6h) : apparently he did not participate in practice or play on the east west shrine game nor the NFL combine. The kid was a mediocre spoiled brat
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah that one that was a super wounded duck that Sanders supporters are highlighting to prove a point
Zero2Cool (7h) : Shough is the guy who missed guys at combine isn't he?
beast (7h) : It's not official until I'm dead! I have a chance still! (Not really)
Mucky Tundra (16h) : I could feel my body decomposing in real time when I read that
Mucky Tundra (16h) : @MIKEYSAINRISTIL Tyler Shough will officially be the last person drafted to the NFL born in the 1900’s
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : saw the tweet, he meant the city
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : Was that for the team or the city?
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 3m Draft grade is in: Green Bay gets an A. The people, the city, the venue were all superb. NFL Draft’s next
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matt LaFleur says Jaire Alexander is participating in #Packers offseason program, which has been conducted virtually during this first week
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : ✅ ...
buckeyepackfan (26-Apr) : Check
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matthew Golden cahanged 81 to 22??
TheKanataThrilla (26-Apr) : Sam Howell to Vikings...guess no Aaron
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Agree
dfosterf (26-Apr) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (26-Apr) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (26-Apr) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (26-Apr) : Great point Martha
beast (26-Apr) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (26-Apr) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (26-Apr) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 4rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (25-Apr) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Around The NFL / bboystyle

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.