So, i'm to believe, science can't prove something happened, only that it didn't happen.
So once again, it takes blind faith to believe that "millions of years ago" they say something happened....even though they can't prove it. But because they can't prove it DIDN'T happen that way, it MUST HAVE happened that way? HUH???
I understand, there are some things science CAN prove, because they are things that are still happening, and they can use that to figure things out. But just because they can't dissprove evolution, doesn't mean it happened.
They can't prove God made everything, or prove He didn't.
Science works this way. Lets say you walk into a room, and a candle is burning. You can watch the candle, and mathmatically figure out how much longer it will take the candle to burn down to nothing.
Then you can calculate backwards to see how long the candle was hours ago, days ago, weeks ago, months ago, years ago, decades ago. Right?
Of course to do that, you have to take some things for granted. Like, that the candle was ALWAYS burnng at the same speed, meaning the oxygen in the room was exactly the same back then as it is now.
And you really don't know how long the candle was, do you?
Or how about when exactly was the candle first lit?
Science can only prove what is, not what once was without undeniable PROOF.
When they find fossils, they have definite proof that that animal lived at one time. But that does not prove how many years ago, does it?
They find ONE partial skeleton (40% of the bones) and label it as the "missing link" in man's evolution. Maybe if they found 500 of the same exact type of skeleton, their supposed "proof" would make at least SOME sense. But ONE? That proves that that one ape or person lived at one time, nothing more. If it was a complete skeleton, not more then half of it made up of "I guess it might have looked like THIS" so called science, it would make some sense.
Tooth of an extinct pig, whale bones lied about as supposed "pelvis bones" ....their track record remains intact.