Cheesey, you disparage science with many claims of inaccuracy - perhaps you might want to cite sources.

I'd like to see where exactly "Carbon dating has been PROVEN inaccurate."

"TheEngineer" wrote:

This means that the biosphere just prior to the Flood might have had 500 times more carbon

If that were the case

When the Flood is taken into account along with the decay of the magnetic field, it is reasonable to believe

They also show a display where white moths flourished, and most of the trees in the area are white birch trees. Then a factory moved in, and blew soot out, which covered the white trees with black soot. In a short time, guess what happened? There were very few white moths, and lots of black ones! POOF! The moths evolved! (Thats what the display says, this PROVED evolution) Now, lets see. White colored moths, and black colored moths. Where is the evolution? Both are what? 100% MOTH. Here is the explanation of what REALLY is the case. White and black moths were born in equal numbers all along! Both colors were in their DNA! If you put a BLACK moth onto a white tree, and it's next to a white moth, which one stands out more? Which one is more likely to be seen by birds and other predators? Now change the color of the trees to black.....NOW which color moth stands out?

"Cheesey" wrote:

In truth, however, there were problems with Kettlewell's experiments. Perhaps the most significant was that he released moths onto tree trunks.

Although moths occasionally choose trunks as a daytime resting place, they prefer the underside of branches. Kettlewell also let his moths go during the day, even though they normally choose their resting place at night. And he released more moths than would naturally be present in an area, which may have made them more conspicuous and tempted birds to eat them even if they wouldn't normally.