Orygunfan76
15 years ago

I understand and agree with the point, however Kurt hasn't been wavering about retirement for nearly a half dozen years to anyone who would listen. Possibly because no one cared though lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


They probably would have cared/listened more if he had made it an annual event with press conference, tears and all or if he had actually played for a team with more of a national following right now.
blank
Heatherthepackgirl
15 years ago

You really do not understand why its called a hostage situation?

It is an odd term to use but in a way its the perfect word..

answer these

would the Jets do exactly the same thing if he plays or retires?

Meaning,would they still draft the same guys, or go after same free agents no matter what?


Or would they have to alter the draft or free agents depending on what Brett wants to do?

That is not a knock on Brett...Its reality.

I am pretty sure that they have to adjust their plan according to what Brett is going to do..


So if that statement is true, then in a way Brett is holding up their plan,or lack of a better word hostage.


Again that is not me saying he is an ass, its just how the situation has been 3 or 4 years...

"longtimefan" wrote:




That "hostage" situation is between Brett and the team, if the team is okay with it, then it should be okay for us as well. And believe it or not I do know what the word hostage means, I know that they need to know an answer in how they go about their business. As long as Brett decides in their time frame they are probably okay with it.
Heathiee
longtimefan
15 years ago

You really do not understand why its called a hostage situation?

It is an odd term to use but in a way its the perfect word..

answer these

would the Jets do exactly the same thing if he plays or retires?

Meaning,would they still draft the same guys, or go after same free agents no matter what?


Or would they have to alter the draft or free agents depending on what Brett wants to do?

That is not a knock on Brett...Its reality.

I am pretty sure that they have to adjust their plan according to what Brett is going to do..


So if that statement is true, then in a way Brett is holding up their plan,or lack of a better word hostage.


Again that is not me saying he is an ass, its just how the situation has been 3 or 4 years...

"Heatherthepackgirl" wrote:




That "hostage" situation is between Brett and the team, if the team is okay with it, then it should be okay for us as well. And believe it or not I do know what the word hostage means, I know that they need to know an answer in how they go about their business. As long as Brett decides in their time frame they are probably okay with it.

"longtimefan" wrote:




FYI...

I am okay with what ever Brett is doing as long as the Jets are okay with it as well

But you didnt answer the questions
dhazer
15 years ago
Ok Long seeing me and you like to butt heads i'll answer some of your questions and return them back at you from when people were saying Brett was holding the Pack hostage.

would the Packers do exactly the same thing if he plays or retires?

They drafted Rodgers in 2005 so yes they would have. They probably wouldn't have drafted the 2nd qb last year but big deal its a 3rd stringer. As far as FA no it wouldn't have seeing Ted Thompson don't do FA. Plus Mike McCarthy said they did not taylor the offense to Rodgers.

Brett was gone last year and what did Ted Thompson do in the free agent market with all the cap room?

So now can you explain to me how he was holding the packers hostage?


I think warner is playing the retirement card to try and get extra money in a contract but he better watch what he does sounds like Boldin is confident he won't be back in AZ.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Trippster
15 years ago
Holding someone or team hostage by definition is purposefully withholding something from another in order to recieve compensation of sorts.

Favre never did that. His (and Warner's) decisions force teams to react, no different than if injury occured or whenever someone retires.

My whole point is what Favre did/ is doing (and Warner) is no different than all the other older players in the league. They all go through it at some point unless they are shown the door prematurely.
"Let Your Light Shine!"
longtimefan
15 years ago
I knew I shouldnt have said hostage was the perfect word..Even tho I said it was odd, sometimes trying to convey an idea of a word never sinks in properly

Anyways...

DH

Why in the hell are you discussing the Packers?

This is about the Jets and their plans on if Brett is staying or going

If they want to get an idea of his thinking by the 20th, apparently they NEED and WANT to plan their actions for the draft and free agency based on his thoughts..

What is so wrong with that?
longtimefan
15 years ago

Holding someone or team hostage by definition is purposefully withholding something from another in order to recieve compensation of sorts.

Favre never did that. His (and Warner's) decisions force teams to react, no different than if injury occured or whenever someone retires.

My whole point is what Favre did/ is doing (and Warner) is no different than all the other older players in the league. They all go through it at some point unless they are shown the door prematurely.

"Trippster" wrote:



I dont agree with the injury part..

You do not nor can you plan on an injury and know exactly what your going to do before it happens.

Brett/Kurt and who ever else, your planning on something one way or the other...Teams can plan on the only 2 options that would happen..

So they need to know what way to turn when the time comes..And depending on those 2 plans the team has, it might be more beneficial to them to know ASAP
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Holding someone or team hostage by definition is purposefully withholding something from another in order to recieve compensation of sorts.

Favre never did that. His (and Warner's) decisions force teams to react, no different than if injury occured or whenever someone retires.

My whole point is what Favre did/ is doing (and Warner) is no different than all the other older players in the league. They all go through it at some point unless they are shown the door prematurely.

"Trippster" wrote:

Did you happen to read my Brett Waffling thread in the Brett Favre section by chance? 🙂
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

I knew I shouldnt have said hostage was the perfect word..Even tho I said it was odd, sometimes trying to convey an idea of a word never sinks in properly

Anyways...

DH

Why in the hell are you discussing the Packers?

This is about the Jets and their plans on if Brett is staying or going

If they want to get an idea of his thinking by the 20th, apparently they NEED and WANT to plan their actions for the draft and free agency based on his thoughts..

What is so wrong with that?

"longtimefan" wrote:




I was talking Packers because so many people said Brett was holding the Packers hostage those years. So i want to know why they classified it as holding them hostage when it never did make a difference if they knew or not. Now with the Jets they pretty much know Brett is done and i believe if he does go back they will release him seeing they are around 12 million over the cap and with releasing him that clears up 13 million. So to be honest i don't see the Jets that worried about the decision and btw back on topic i see Warner back in AZ after he gets his 2 year contract that he wants.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
So many people said that? What about the other side where so many said that was not the case and that Brett deserves to take his time and make his decision? Ahh of course you won't mention those members from this website even though we've been pretty much down the middle with it.


And honestly, the more reports coming out about Brett and the things he did. As much as this sucks to say, but it's seeming more and more that he really likes the attention far more than he lets on. Heck, he even admitted that he watched a plethora of segments/shows dedicated on his behalf.

My personal feeling on it is that the media made too much out of it. He was under contract, he didn't say he was going to retire, so why keep asking him? That's where I think it would have been good for Brett to just respond to the retirement questions with "did I retire?, okay then". But that's not Brett, that's not why so many like him. He speaks his mind at that time. And at that time (like MANY players have said) of the off season many players feel like hanging it up and its not until weeks before Training Camp that they get that itch again.

I think its partially the media's fault for being poor ass journalists who can't find something else to write up and partially on Brett for wanting everyone talking about him. I'm bias FOR Brett and bias AGAINST the media so I'm obviously leaning that more fault lies onto the Media than Brett.


As for Kurt Warner. The mentioning of him holding the Cardinals hostage I think is ridiculous. I mean, they HAVE what they feel is their future QB already so how could he be holding them hostage? Much like the Packers had Rodgers for the last three years of Brett's Packers career. Brett retiring wouldn't have changed a whole heckuva lot I don't think. Maybe it steered some players away from signing with us, but that is not the case with the Cardinals.

Kurt Warner and Brett Favre ... hostage case. Non issue and i can't believe I'm talking about it. Damn, I'm freaking bored!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (3h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (3h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (3h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (13h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (19h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (21h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.