Orygunfan76
15 years ago

I understand and agree with the point, however Kurt hasn't been wavering about retirement for nearly a half dozen years to anyone who would listen. Possibly because no one cared though lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


They probably would have cared/listened more if he had made it an annual event with press conference, tears and all or if he had actually played for a team with more of a national following right now.
blank
Heatherthepackgirl
15 years ago

You really do not understand why its called a hostage situation?

It is an odd term to use but in a way its the perfect word..

answer these

would the Jets do exactly the same thing if he plays or retires?

Meaning,would they still draft the same guys, or go after same free agents no matter what?


Or would they have to alter the draft or free agents depending on what Brett wants to do?

That is not a knock on Brett...Its reality.

I am pretty sure that they have to adjust their plan according to what Brett is going to do..


So if that statement is true, then in a way Brett is holding up their plan,or lack of a better word hostage.


Again that is not me saying he is an ass, its just how the situation has been 3 or 4 years...

"longtimefan" wrote:




That "hostage" situation is between Brett and the team, if the team is okay with it, then it should be okay for us as well. And believe it or not I do know what the word hostage means, I know that they need to know an answer in how they go about their business. As long as Brett decides in their time frame they are probably okay with it.
Heathiee
longtimefan
15 years ago

You really do not understand why its called a hostage situation?

It is an odd term to use but in a way its the perfect word..

answer these

would the Jets do exactly the same thing if he plays or retires?

Meaning,would they still draft the same guys, or go after same free agents no matter what?


Or would they have to alter the draft or free agents depending on what Brett wants to do?

That is not a knock on Brett...Its reality.

I am pretty sure that they have to adjust their plan according to what Brett is going to do..


So if that statement is true, then in a way Brett is holding up their plan,or lack of a better word hostage.


Again that is not me saying he is an ass, its just how the situation has been 3 or 4 years...

"Heatherthepackgirl" wrote:




That "hostage" situation is between Brett and the team, if the team is okay with it, then it should be okay for us as well. And believe it or not I do know what the word hostage means, I know that they need to know an answer in how they go about their business. As long as Brett decides in their time frame they are probably okay with it.

"longtimefan" wrote:




FYI...

I am okay with what ever Brett is doing as long as the Jets are okay with it as well

But you didnt answer the questions
dhazer
15 years ago
Ok Long seeing me and you like to butt heads i'll answer some of your questions and return them back at you from when people were saying Brett was holding the Pack hostage.

would the Packers do exactly the same thing if he plays or retires?

They drafted Rodgers in 2005 so yes they would have. They probably wouldn't have drafted the 2nd qb last year but big deal its a 3rd stringer. As far as FA no it wouldn't have seeing Ted Thompson don't do FA. Plus Mike McCarthy said they did not taylor the offense to Rodgers.

Brett was gone last year and what did Ted Thompson do in the free agent market with all the cap room?

So now can you explain to me how he was holding the packers hostage?


I think warner is playing the retirement card to try and get extra money in a contract but he better watch what he does sounds like Boldin is confident he won't be back in AZ.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Trippster
15 years ago
Holding someone or team hostage by definition is purposefully withholding something from another in order to recieve compensation of sorts.

Favre never did that. His (and Warner's) decisions force teams to react, no different than if injury occured or whenever someone retires.

My whole point is what Favre did/ is doing (and Warner) is no different than all the other older players in the league. They all go through it at some point unless they are shown the door prematurely.
"Let Your Light Shine!"
longtimefan
15 years ago
I knew I shouldnt have said hostage was the perfect word..Even tho I said it was odd, sometimes trying to convey an idea of a word never sinks in properly

Anyways...

DH

Why in the hell are you discussing the Packers?

This is about the Jets and their plans on if Brett is staying or going

If they want to get an idea of his thinking by the 20th, apparently they NEED and WANT to plan their actions for the draft and free agency based on his thoughts..

What is so wrong with that?
longtimefan
15 years ago

Holding someone or team hostage by definition is purposefully withholding something from another in order to recieve compensation of sorts.

Favre never did that. His (and Warner's) decisions force teams to react, no different than if injury occured or whenever someone retires.

My whole point is what Favre did/ is doing (and Warner) is no different than all the other older players in the league. They all go through it at some point unless they are shown the door prematurely.

"Trippster" wrote:



I dont agree with the injury part..

You do not nor can you plan on an injury and know exactly what your going to do before it happens.

Brett/Kurt and who ever else, your planning on something one way or the other...Teams can plan on the only 2 options that would happen..

So they need to know what way to turn when the time comes..And depending on those 2 plans the team has, it might be more beneficial to them to know ASAP
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Holding someone or team hostage by definition is purposefully withholding something from another in order to recieve compensation of sorts.

Favre never did that. His (and Warner's) decisions force teams to react, no different than if injury occured or whenever someone retires.

My whole point is what Favre did/ is doing (and Warner) is no different than all the other older players in the league. They all go through it at some point unless they are shown the door prematurely.

"Trippster" wrote:

Did you happen to read my Brett Waffling thread in the Brett Favre section by chance? 🙂
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago

I knew I shouldnt have said hostage was the perfect word..Even tho I said it was odd, sometimes trying to convey an idea of a word never sinks in properly

Anyways...

DH

Why in the hell are you discussing the Packers?

This is about the Jets and their plans on if Brett is staying or going

If they want to get an idea of his thinking by the 20th, apparently they NEED and WANT to plan their actions for the draft and free agency based on his thoughts..

What is so wrong with that?

"longtimefan" wrote:




I was talking Packers because so many people said Brett was holding the Packers hostage those years. So i want to know why they classified it as holding them hostage when it never did make a difference if they knew or not. Now with the Jets they pretty much know Brett is done and i believe if he does go back they will release him seeing they are around 12 million over the cap and with releasing him that clears up 13 million. So to be honest i don't see the Jets that worried about the decision and btw back on topic i see Warner back in AZ after he gets his 2 year contract that he wants.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
So many people said that? What about the other side where so many said that was not the case and that Brett deserves to take his time and make his decision? Ahh of course you won't mention those members from this website even though we've been pretty much down the middle with it.


And honestly, the more reports coming out about Brett and the things he did. As much as this sucks to say, but it's seeming more and more that he really likes the attention far more than he lets on. Heck, he even admitted that he watched a plethora of segments/shows dedicated on his behalf.

My personal feeling on it is that the media made too much out of it. He was under contract, he didn't say he was going to retire, so why keep asking him? That's where I think it would have been good for Brett to just respond to the retirement questions with "did I retire?, okay then". But that's not Brett, that's not why so many like him. He speaks his mind at that time. And at that time (like MANY players have said) of the off season many players feel like hanging it up and its not until weeks before Training Camp that they get that itch again.

I think its partially the media's fault for being poor ass journalists who can't find something else to write up and partially on Brett for wanting everyone talking about him. I'm bias FOR Brett and bias AGAINST the media so I'm obviously leaning that more fault lies onto the Media than Brett.


As for Kurt Warner. The mentioning of him holding the Cardinals hostage I think is ridiculous. I mean, they HAVE what they feel is their future QB already so how could he be holding them hostage? Much like the Packers had Rodgers for the last three years of Brett's Packers career. Brett retiring wouldn't have changed a whole heckuva lot I don't think. Maybe it steered some players away from signing with us, but that is not the case with the Cardinals.

Kurt Warner and Brett Favre ... hostage case. Non issue and i can't believe I'm talking about it. Damn, I'm freaking bored!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1m) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (6m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (6m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (16m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (21m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (24m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (24m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (26m) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (36m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (41m) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (45m) : Packers will get in
beast (45m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (51m) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (51m) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (3h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (3h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (13h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.