Report: Packers tried to sign Brian Hoyer· Page 5

isocleas2
Member

7 years ago

?????

Lie? Where? I'm indicting ALL fan forums of every team.

Again, what is a lie? Were you play2win? Your response indicates a strong defense mechanism for that poster as if you're him. There's no lie above but would like to know what you believe is.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You gotta chill out on the conspiracy theories uffda. I feel like half your posts are just rants about crooked dealings of the Packers brass (mostly imagined), now you're going after poster's alt identities?

You're becoming one giant pizzagate.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#42

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I love it!!!! You deflect by asking me if I was play2win? What a joke. play2win accused me of being you! Maybe it is YOU who is handling/handled both accounts. Adams was better than Sharpe? Proof? Jarrett Boykin was better than Alshon Jeffery? Proof? You don't take the time substantiate your claims of another member, yet expect others to go to great lengths to pick through your filibuster-length post? Throw a ton of noodles on the wall and tell someone to grab the best one so you can tell them how it is NOT the best one! Brilliant lawyer tactic.

Anyhow, what about this garbage for starters.

You can bet if I was on this forum hollering about how Aaron Jones was the best back and needed to play all I would get in return is...MM is a great football coach. He knows what he's doing.

I believe some were pining for each of the RB's over Ty Montgomery. I'm not sure anyone rebuttal with Mike McCarthy is a great coach, he knows what he's doing.

Go check out the other Packers forums. You will find many of them are very close to a cult if not an actual online version. You will see, "I think I'll go with Mike McCarthy over what you have to say". It's cute.

Wow, forum communities are a cult?? That's not egregious and offensive. Wait, it is. But, hey, it's your opinion, so that's fine.

We're going to be fine with Seneca and or Scott and now Brett because Mike McCarthy is a great QB coach and brilliant mind.

What's wrong with fans hoping for the best? I don't think anyone believes McCarthy is a great QB coach or a brilliant mind. More hyperbole.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#43

1. The Patriots held onto Jimmy G . As long as they could.
As the trade deadline approached they were either going to have to trade him or they would not get anything for him but a comp. Pick in 2019 because Jimmy G made it clear he wanted to go somewhere and be a starter.
The only other option would be to pay him starter money to sit behind Brady. That wasn't going to happen .
2. Bellicheck contacts The 49rs letting them know JG is available.
3. 49rs offer a 2nd rnd pick.
2. Bill wants more, but 49rs hold all the cards.
3. Bill agrees to a 2nd, only if 49rs release Hoyer.

Hoyer must be released before trade deadline so comp picks are not involved and Hoyer does not have to clear waivers .

4. The trade is announced and Hoyer release is announced before trade deadline.

5. Any team who's GM is doing their due diligence is going to call and inquire about Hoyer

6. Hoyer was never going anywhere but to The Patriots! NO matter how many teams inquired about him.

The deal was always Jimmy G. for a 2nd and Hoyer.

Any other theories being thrown out on this forum is just fantasy.

Sorry, but this conspiracy theory that there is a riff between GM and HC is just a huge joke!
Nice try though.

Pretty sure Ted or someone from personal made a call, just like they probably do 10 times a day before the deadline..

Pretty sure that Mike doesn't want to hear about all of these calls, only the ones that are definitely going to effect the roster.

This one was not!

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#44

Adams was better than Sharpe? Proof?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Here ya go...

I just love this pick. The second coming of Sterling Sharpe, but better...

This guy, Davante Adams, is going to be one of our best WRs ever in GB. I think he will have that kind of career.

Originally Posted by: play2win

There are more than one post by play2win on this subject. He went on to say that Davante would go on to outdo Sterling's 5 probowl appearances...kept gushing and gushing. Called him better than Jennings, and he hadn't donned the uniform.

Same things were said of Boykin. We also had someone on this forum saying Quarless was better than Rob Gronkowski. My memory is very good and I am not a liar.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

isocleas2
Member

7 years ago

#45

I now believe Zero2Cool = Uffda = play2win

It was a false flag operation from the start. 😝

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#46

Here ya go...

play2win #33 Posted : 3 years ago Applaud Quote Multi-Quote
I just love this pick. The second coming of Sterling Sharpe, but better...

This guy, Davante Adams, is going to be one of our best WRs ever in GB. I think he will have that kind of career.

There are more than one post by play2win on this subject. He went on to say that Davante would go on to outdo Sterling's 5 probowl appearances...kept gushing and gushing. Called him better than Jennings, and he hadn't donned the uniform.

Same things were said of Boykin. We also had someone on this forum saying Quarless was better than Rob Gronkowski. My memory is very good and I am not a liar.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

He wasn't alone, or even the first to mention Sterling Sharpe. (to be fair, you did mention there were two crazies)

And bigger. Did we just redraft Sterling Sharpe, or am I really tired?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Oh, I've said 19-0 before bubs!

😆

FYI it is all good, and I knew what I was doing when I said that. Some don't like statements like that. But I believe this kid is going to be special.

And really, my very first reference was just that I thought Adams looked like Sharpe. Just that he looked like him....

Originally Posted by: play2win

If you wanna follow the flow better here's one of the topics .

I'm curious. You went and dug that up for what reason? To prove that a fan can be hopeful? That a fan can make a bold prediction? Remember, this person is a fan, not a NFL Head Coach of the Packers. What is so wrong about a fan being so hopeful about a newly acquired player? You said that they said Adams was better than Sharpe. What I read was that they believed Adams would be better, meaning, it was a prediction, or projection.

And while you're at it, let's discuss how this relates to Brian Hoyer and the possible interest the Packers may or may not have had in him. I will need your assistance there because I have no idea how someone who hasn't logged into the site since August 2014 is even brought up in 2017. I'm fascinated by this obsession.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#47

I now believe Zero2Cool = Uffda = play2win

It was a false flag operation from the start. 😝

Originally Posted by: isocleas2

I also run the accounts for isocleas2, wpr and beast. Now you know!!!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#48

I dug it up, again...not the first time, because I've been asked for proof before. When you ask me for proof why are you asking why I dug it up? I don't lie and my memory is good.

Going after Hoyer is a huge story because it shows the org isn't sold on it's QB room. This org has as much or more doubt in Hundley as a lot of us do.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#49

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Reading through the topics, the person said Adams would be better, far better than Sharpe. That was a prediction, where as your claim earlier was a straight up "is better". Huge difference there. ;-)

What if it was just Brian Hoyer's agent trying to get interest on his client or crank up the salary? What if that's all it was and the Packers actually did not inquire about Brian Hoyer at all? Are you going to then say how poor the Packers are running the team for not exploring any option to potential improve the roster? Do you see how frustrating this is? Nothing they do is good enough. Everything they don't do is wrong. You do like Brett Hundley, so I guess there's that one thing you like about the team, haha.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#50

I'm totally puzzled by this continued insistence that Hoyer's agent used this stuff at all? Where is this coming from?

The Packers link to Hoyer came AFTER he'd signed with NE. So, the idea being floated that his agent used it for bargaining is a non starter.

We were interested. Can anyone just deal with that? We weren't interested in him in the sense of Jerod Powers, and he wasn't of interest to backup Hundley. He was of interest because Hundley has been terrible and org sees season slipping away. Org may actually do something if Hundley bombs again tonight. Hello, Romo?

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (2h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (2h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (5h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (5h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (5h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (5h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (5h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (5h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (5h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (5h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (7h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (7h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (7h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (7h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (7h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (8h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (8h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (8h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (9h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (9h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (9h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (10h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (10h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (11h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (11h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (12h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (12h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (12h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (12h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (12h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (12h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (12h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (12h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (12h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (12h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (12h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (12h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (12h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (12h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (12h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS