Greg C.
14 years ago
Typical Belichick. He says a lot but doesn't really say anything. Wins are more important than stats? Points are the most important stat? Who woulda thunk it!

I like stats because they are fun and sometimes revealing. I'm not going to let Bill Belichick spoil my party.

I wonder if someday we can have a discussion about stats without somebody feeling the need to point out that wins and losses are more important than stats.
blank
Pack93z
14 years ago
It isn't about stats not being important.. it is many stats can be canceled out by other stats..

IMO.. a low time of possession number would negatively influence your defensive numbers because they would have to face more plays per game, and later in the game due to fatigue factor would give up more yards/points.

In other words.. looking just at defensive numbers without looking at correlating stats and measuring the impact of them.. can one really say that the single stat is the root cause for the effect?

A team that has a grinding running game, will dominate the time of possession and elevate the numbers of defense, making it appear that they are better than they are.

I love stats.. but stats have correlations to other stats.. and we can argue endlessly which is the most important.

Apparently I should have pared down the quote..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Greg C.
14 years ago
That's all very true, pack. Your statements have been a lot more insightful than the Belichick quote.

I'd be interested to look into the time of possession thing more. I've always thought that a TOP advantage was usually more of an effect of winning (or having a lead) than a cause of it--sort of like rushing yards.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Agreed Greg about the running. I think it's the same with TOS but this year has been weird. One of our losses, we had the ball 36 minutes to their 24 and still lost.

There is no catch all stat. There is no magic formula to winning a SB. You can increase your odds by having the #1 D as it happened 4 times in the past decade.

Belichick was taking a page out of Mike Ditka's book by slamming people who use stats. Well, I happen to like stats. We all do. If you play fantasy football, you love stats. When you argue who is better than who, you use stats. Stats are another form of dick measuring contests between fans. My team is better than your team. Oh yeah? Prove it. OK, fine, here are these stats...

Well, just for fun, I'll give you even more stats. These are the past 10 Super Bowl winners with their Offense rankings, ther Defense rankings, the point differential ratings, and the takeaway/giveaway differential rankings. The '07 Giants are the one team where a stat nut would just take a look at them and say WTF?

Have fun with this.


Year   Team   O   D   Diff   T/G
2000   Rvns    14  1    2     1
2001   Pats    6   6    7     9
2002   Bucs    18  1    2     1
2003   Pats    12  1    6     2
2004   Pats    4   2    1     8
2005   Stlr    9   3    5     9
2006   Clts    2   23   9     6
2007   Gnts    14  17   13    26
2008   Stlr    20  1    5     11
2009   Stns    1   20   1     3

Funny thing looking at it was the '07 Giants even were -9 when it comes to Takeaways/Giveaways. They had an average O, a mediocre D, lousy when it comes to turnover ratio, yet they manage to win it all.

It happens. The game is weird. But historically, when the Packers lead the league in D, we get a Championship. That's what I can make out of all this jazz.

(by the way, getting that graph to line up isn't easy).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
14 years ago
The '07 Giants were a slightly above average team that just got blazing hot at exactly the right time. That's really all there is to it.

The big exceptions to the "defense wins championships" mantra during the 2000's are the '06 Colts and the '09 Saints. But the Colts were the exception that proved the rule. As I recall, their offense kind of sputtered in the playoffs that year, while their defense got hot, with Bob Sanders coming back from an injury, and really it was their defense that they rode to the championship.

That leaves last year's Saints as the only team of the past decade that really and truly relied on their offense more than their defense to win in the playoffs.
blank
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago

The '07 Giants were a slightly above average team that just got blazing hot at exactly the right time. That's really all there is to it.

The big exceptions to the "defense wins championships" mantra during the 2000's are the '06 Colts and the '09 Saints. But the Colts were the exception that proved the rule. As I recall, their offense kind of sputtered in the playoffs that year, while their defense got hot, with Bob Sanders coming back from an injury, and really it was their defense that they rode to the championship.

That leaves last year's Saints as the only team of the past decade that really and truly relied on their offense more than their defense to win in the playoffs.

"Greg C." wrote:



Just to add to this, if I remember right, The Saints last year did have the most takeaways last year and led the NFL in defensive scores. Their ranking may not have been high but the TOS was the best in the league.

I think the one constant in football has always been win the turnover battle and you wil winn most games.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Cheesey
14 years ago
Bart Starr in the 1960's didn't have great passing stats. The defense was what kept them in the games. Starr was great and getting what he could, and not making the big mistakes.
Today, if you don't have a good defense, you are in trouble. Look at the 1989 Packers. "Majic" scored like crazy, but our D gave up almost as many points. Every game was a shootout. It was an exciting season, but had we had a decent defense, we would have won the SB. (IN my opinion)
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago



There is no catch all stat. There is no magic formula to winning a SB. You can increase your odds by having the #1 D as it happened 4 times in the past decade.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



That is the point.. there is no one stat that can completely and directly correlate to success by itself.

Even my TOP argument can be altered with big explosive plays.. but I would argue, more so than not, if you control the ball.. you dictate the 3rd down conversions, score on a greater percentage of drives and thus keep the opposing offense off the field.. thus keeping their conversion ration lower and less points upon the board.

So if you are score on a greater number of drive, keep the ball out of the offenses hands, you defense rank with be greater and it will lead to more wins.

But I agree.. it is not a magic formula and there will be anomalies to be found where teams do something irregular, lets say lead the league in forcing turnovers and scoring with them and alter the importance of the others.

There is a reason I preach balance, it might not guarantee a victory, but it most definitely will improve your odds.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
yooperfan
14 years ago

Bart Starr in the 1960's didn't have great passing stats. The defense was what kept them in the games. Starr was great and getting what he could, and not making the big mistakes.
Today, if you don't have a good defense, you are in trouble. Look at the 1989 Packers. "Majic" scored like crazy, but our D gave up almost as many points. Every game was a shootout. It was an exciting season, but had we had a decent defense, we would have won the SB. (IN my opinion)

"Cheesey" wrote:



Let us not forget; Starr not only had a great defense during his playing days but a great running game as well.
He called his own game and was a master at controlling the clock.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Well, when I have time later, I'll show stats of passing vs rushing. I've had a million of them in other threads. I really think D is a lot more important than O balance and can prove it with stats.

I'll use both Packers championship teams and SB teams from the past 10 years. The thing both have in common is the #1 stat of all is an elite D. If there's one cliche that works, it's D wins championships. That is above all the other stats.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Giants DC Shane Bowen tells players to “be a damn pirate."
dfosterf (6-Jun) : Semper fi !
Cheesey (6-Jun) : This is why I have so much respect for those that have gone through battles
Cheesey (6-Jun) : I can't even imagine what that would have been like
wpr (6-Jun) : "Come on, you sons of bitches. Do you want to live forever?"
wpr (6-Jun) : Facing a line of machine guns 2 time medal of Honor recipient, First Sergeant Dan Daly told his men,
wpr (6-Jun) : Another detachment went into the Belleau Wood.
wpr (6-Jun) : On the 6th the Marines took Hill 142 but suffered terrible losses.
wpr (6-Jun) : It’s time to remember dfoster’s Marine brothers in Belleau Wood. The battle went on from June 1-26. Nearly 10,000 casualties.
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : Nick Collins and Morgan Burnett have signed with the PACK
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : he won't be wearing #12, maybe he will wear number two
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : He will fail this season, should have retired
Mucky Tundra (5-Jun) : Thus the cycle of Hall of Fame Packer QBs going to the Jets and then the Vikings is broken
bboystyle (5-Jun) : Rodgers to steelers on 1 year contract
Zero2Cool (5-Jun) : It's the cycle of civilizations. Get lazier, lazier, softer, softer and vanish.
Martha Careful (5-Jun) : great point. every aspect of society, including art, culture and sports has degraded.
dfosterf (4-Jun) : Green Bay sweep meant something to society about stopping pure excellence. We have the tush push now
dfosterf (4-Jun) : We old Martha.
Martha Careful (4-Jun) : *front four
Martha Careful (4-Jun) : Re frout four, I wish we had some Green "People Eaters" or a fearsome foursome
dfosterf (4-Jun) : *directions*
dfosterf (4-Jun) : Just don't ask him for driving direct
dfosterf (4-Jun) : Jim Marshall was an all-time great DE for the Purple People Eaters. Didn't like him. That's a compliment. RIP
Zero2Cool (3-Jun) : ooppppss
Zero2Cool (3-Jun) : “Kenny Clark played all of last season hurt by the way and got surgery to fix it in January”
Mucky Tundra (3-Jun) : @ByRyanWood How much did the injury affect him last fall? “A lot.”
Mucky Tundra (3-Jun) : @ByRyanWood Kenny Clark said he had foot surgery in January. Injured his foot in opener against Eagles and played through it all year.
Zero2Cool (3-Jun) : Golden is wearing guardian cap again. I bet he plays with it on too.
Mucky Tundra (3-Jun) : All the stuff I'm reading from Lions fans are pointing at his toe; he more or less has permanent turf toe in one of his big toes
dfosterf (3-Jun) : Kenny played through it, and a shame he gets little credit for that, imo
dfosterf (3-Jun) : Big men. I hope it's not the undoing of Kenny Clark
dfosterf (3-Jun) : Probably his toe. Pretty much a great center. Toe injuries are brutal to bigen
Mucky Tundra (2-Jun) : Lions All-Pro C Frank Ragnow retires
wpr (30-May) : It's all good.
beast (30-May) : Yeah, and I enjoyed your comments and just attempted to add to it. Sorry if I did it incorrectly.
wpr (30-May) : Beast I never said Henderson was the salt of the earth. Nor even that he was correct. Just quoting the guy.
Zero2Cool (29-May) : What did you do??
Zero2Cool (29-May) : Whoa
beast (29-May) : OMG the website is now all white, even some white on white text
beast (29-May) : Henderson, who admits to taking cocaine during the Super Bowl against the Steelers, might dislike Bradshaw as he lost two Superbowls to him
wpr (28-May) : Hollywood Henderson said Bradshaw “is so dumb, he couldn't spell 'cat' if you spotted him the C and an A.”
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : Cooper stock=BUY BUY BUY
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : Also notes he’s playing with more confidence.
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : @AndyHermanNFL MLF says there was a time last year where Cooper was at 220 pounds. Now he’s at 240 and still flying around.
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : And don't even get me started on Frank Caliendos "impersonations"
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : I got tired of them being circle jerks with them overlaughing at each others jokes.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : It used to be must watch TV for me. now it's "meh" maybe to hear injury update
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : I haven't watched the pregame shows in years and I don't feel like I've missed a thing
Zero2Cool (28-May) : Love says knee affected him all season, groin injury didn't help matters.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
7-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

6-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

27-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-May / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

23-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

22-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.