Greg C.
14 years ago
Typical Belichick. He says a lot but doesn't really say anything. Wins are more important than stats? Points are the most important stat? Who woulda thunk it!

I like stats because they are fun and sometimes revealing. I'm not going to let Bill Belichick spoil my party.

I wonder if someday we can have a discussion about stats without somebody feeling the need to point out that wins and losses are more important than stats.
blank
Pack93z
14 years ago
It isn't about stats not being important.. it is many stats can be canceled out by other stats..

IMO.. a low time of possession number would negatively influence your defensive numbers because they would have to face more plays per game, and later in the game due to fatigue factor would give up more yards/points.

In other words.. looking just at defensive numbers without looking at correlating stats and measuring the impact of them.. can one really say that the single stat is the root cause for the effect?

A team that has a grinding running game, will dominate the time of possession and elevate the numbers of defense, making it appear that they are better than they are.

I love stats.. but stats have correlations to other stats.. and we can argue endlessly which is the most important.

Apparently I should have pared down the quote..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Greg C.
14 years ago
That's all very true, pack. Your statements have been a lot more insightful than the Belichick quote.

I'd be interested to look into the time of possession thing more. I've always thought that a TOP advantage was usually more of an effect of winning (or having a lead) than a cause of it--sort of like rushing yards.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Agreed Greg about the running. I think it's the same with TOS but this year has been weird. One of our losses, we had the ball 36 minutes to their 24 and still lost.

There is no catch all stat. There is no magic formula to winning a SB. You can increase your odds by having the #1 D as it happened 4 times in the past decade.

Belichick was taking a page out of Mike Ditka's book by slamming people who use stats. Well, I happen to like stats. We all do. If you play fantasy football, you love stats. When you argue who is better than who, you use stats. Stats are another form of dick measuring contests between fans. My team is better than your team. Oh yeah? Prove it. OK, fine, here are these stats...

Well, just for fun, I'll give you even more stats. These are the past 10 Super Bowl winners with their Offense rankings, ther Defense rankings, the point differential ratings, and the takeaway/giveaway differential rankings. The '07 Giants are the one team where a stat nut would just take a look at them and say WTF?

Have fun with this.


Year   Team   O   D   Diff   T/G
2000   Rvns    14  1    2     1
2001   Pats    6   6    7     9
2002   Bucs    18  1    2     1
2003   Pats    12  1    6     2
2004   Pats    4   2    1     8
2005   Stlr    9   3    5     9
2006   Clts    2   23   9     6
2007   Gnts    14  17   13    26
2008   Stlr    20  1    5     11
2009   Stns    1   20   1     3

Funny thing looking at it was the '07 Giants even were -9 when it comes to Takeaways/Giveaways. They had an average O, a mediocre D, lousy when it comes to turnover ratio, yet they manage to win it all.

It happens. The game is weird. But historically, when the Packers lead the league in D, we get a Championship. That's what I can make out of all this jazz.

(by the way, getting that graph to line up isn't easy).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
14 years ago
The '07 Giants were a slightly above average team that just got blazing hot at exactly the right time. That's really all there is to it.

The big exceptions to the "defense wins championships" mantra during the 2000's are the '06 Colts and the '09 Saints. But the Colts were the exception that proved the rule. As I recall, their offense kind of sputtered in the playoffs that year, while their defense got hot, with Bob Sanders coming back from an injury, and really it was their defense that they rode to the championship.

That leaves last year's Saints as the only team of the past decade that really and truly relied on their offense more than their defense to win in the playoffs.
blank
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago

The '07 Giants were a slightly above average team that just got blazing hot at exactly the right time. That's really all there is to it.

The big exceptions to the "defense wins championships" mantra during the 2000's are the '06 Colts and the '09 Saints. But the Colts were the exception that proved the rule. As I recall, their offense kind of sputtered in the playoffs that year, while their defense got hot, with Bob Sanders coming back from an injury, and really it was their defense that they rode to the championship.

That leaves last year's Saints as the only team of the past decade that really and truly relied on their offense more than their defense to win in the playoffs.

"Greg C." wrote:



Just to add to this, if I remember right, The Saints last year did have the most takeaways last year and led the NFL in defensive scores. Their ranking may not have been high but the TOS was the best in the league.

I think the one constant in football has always been win the turnover battle and you wil winn most games.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Cheesey
14 years ago
Bart Starr in the 1960's didn't have great passing stats. The defense was what kept them in the games. Starr was great and getting what he could, and not making the big mistakes.
Today, if you don't have a good defense, you are in trouble. Look at the 1989 Packers. "Majic" scored like crazy, but our D gave up almost as many points. Every game was a shootout. It was an exciting season, but had we had a decent defense, we would have won the SB. (IN my opinion)
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago



There is no catch all stat. There is no magic formula to winning a SB. You can increase your odds by having the #1 D as it happened 4 times in the past decade.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



That is the point.. there is no one stat that can completely and directly correlate to success by itself.

Even my TOP argument can be altered with big explosive plays.. but I would argue, more so than not, if you control the ball.. you dictate the 3rd down conversions, score on a greater percentage of drives and thus keep the opposing offense off the field.. thus keeping their conversion ration lower and less points upon the board.

So if you are score on a greater number of drive, keep the ball out of the offenses hands, you defense rank with be greater and it will lead to more wins.

But I agree.. it is not a magic formula and there will be anomalies to be found where teams do something irregular, lets say lead the league in forcing turnovers and scoring with them and alter the importance of the others.

There is a reason I preach balance, it might not guarantee a victory, but it most definitely will improve your odds.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
yooperfan
14 years ago

Bart Starr in the 1960's didn't have great passing stats. The defense was what kept them in the games. Starr was great and getting what he could, and not making the big mistakes.
Today, if you don't have a good defense, you are in trouble. Look at the 1989 Packers. "Majic" scored like crazy, but our D gave up almost as many points. Every game was a shootout. It was an exciting season, but had we had a decent defense, we would have won the SB. (IN my opinion)

"Cheesey" wrote:



Let us not forget; Starr not only had a great defense during his playing days but a great running game as well.
He called his own game and was a master at controlling the clock.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Well, when I have time later, I'll show stats of passing vs rushing. I've had a million of them in other threads. I really think D is a lot more important than O balance and can prove it with stats.

I'll use both Packers championship teams and SB teams from the past 10 years. The thing both have in common is the #1 stat of all is an elite D. If there's one cliche that works, it's D wins championships. That is above all the other stats.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (11h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (11h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (11h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (11h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (13h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (15h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (15h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (15h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (15h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (15h) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (15h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (16h) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (16h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
31m / Around The NFL / beast

10h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.