Packers to the 5th seed?· Page 2

flep
Member

15 years ago

The fact is in any match up involving another NFC team against an AFC team you should always want the AFC team to win.

Go Chargers!!!!!!!

Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years

I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#12

I'm not sure if this is true or not but it might be....

I've read that if the Cowboys lose to the Chargers that means the Packers will be in the NFC's 5th seed at the end of the week no matter what happens in the other 15 games... :magnifyglass: anyone gonna root for the Chargers this week? ... GO CHARGERS :thumbright:

The thought is that if the Cowboys lose then the winner or the Eagles vs Giants game becomes the division leader and the Packers will have a better record than the Cowboys and/or have the head to head tie breaker over the Cowboys.

The only other way for the Packers to get in the 5th seed this week is Packers beat the Bears AND the Giants beat the Eagles.

"beast" wrote:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=currentstandings

Yup if we win and Giants lose we are 5th no matter what anyone else does

DakotaT
Select Member

15 years ago

#13

I'd rather have the #4 seed. (Still possible)

"IronMan" wrote:

My man, so you're saying you believe in the Viking late season nose dive? What would be even sweeter would be to host the Vikings in Lambeau on a really cold day. We all remember how Brett enjoys the cold games at this juncture in his career.

gbpfan
Registered

15 years ago

#14

i'm just happy that we will be in the playoffs :icon_smile:

warhawk
Senior Member

15 years ago

#15

What do we need to face the viks instead of the saints?

"Dulak" wrote:

The final six teams will be ranked #1 thru #6.

If we end up the 6th seed and NO is #1 we would play them in the second round by virtue of them getting the lowest team ranked going into that round.

If I am not mistaken we would need to be #5 for sure and the 6th seed would also have to win sending them to NO and us to the Vikes because if the 6th seed were to lose we would be the lowest ranked team left.

"The train is leaving the station."

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#16

that's the way I understand it warhawk. If NO is the #1 seed (and they will be) and the Vikings are #2, we would need to win the first round and not be the lowest seeded team in round two of the playoffs.

shield4life
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#17

We need to face the Vikings in the first game of playoffs ... If we could get that match up it would be amazing.

The rating of that game would probably be higher then the SB ratings.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

obi1
Registered

15 years ago

#18

I am not counting out the Packers for winning out the rest and the Vikings to lose 3 of the next 4.

That gives US the #3 or #4 seed.

blank

Dulak
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#19

We need to face the Vikings in the first game of playoffs ... If we could get that match up it would be amazing.

The rating of that game would probably be higher then the SB ratings.

"shield4life" wrote:

ha - you probably right

Id love it too; but want it at home

beast
Select Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#20

I'd rather have the #4 seed. (Still possible)

"IronMan" wrote:

Honestly I don't think it's possible... because that means the Packers would have to have a better record than the Vikings (which is possible (but unlikely at this point)) AND 3 teams would have better records than Packers...

If the Packers are able to catch and pass the Vikings then they would probably be the #3 or #2 seed...

"longtimefan" wrote:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=currentstandings

Yup if we win and Giants lose we are 5th no matter what anyone else does

"beast" wrote:

If we win and the Giants lose and the Cowboys win the Packers are still 6th... do you mean if the Cowboys lose?

We need to face the Vikings in the first game of playoffs ... If we could get that match up it would be amazing.

The rating of that game would probably be higher then the SB ratings.

"Dulak" wrote:

ha - you probably right

Id love it too; but want it at home

"shield4life" wrote:

I want to win in their place... to piss them off more... like the Vikings won in GB in the playoffs after being swept by the Packers in the season.....

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (2m) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (2m) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (9h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (9h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (12h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (13h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (13h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you

wpr (14h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (14h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (14h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (14h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (14h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (14h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (15h) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (15h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (15h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE

packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22