dfosterf
15 years ago

To me, this isn't about McCarthy as it is about the organization.

Frankly, I stopped listening to McCarthy's public comments a long time ago. Whatever the reason, I've realized he's not going to say anything that isn't Fleischerized, and Fleischerized ineptly, anymore; so I'm just going to chalk it up to "well, he doesn't do the press well and so long as he puts a good team on the field I'll deal with it by ignoring it. (And if he doesn't I'll criticise him as a field coach.)

But when management as a whole (be it Thompson, or McCarthy, or whoever makes the decisions about hiring/firing assistant maintenance peons) comes off over and over and over as inept publicly, then I worry.

I mean, if this is indeed an isolated case of a cancerous or idiot employee, an organization the size of the packers should be able to handle it without it becoming a media firestorm. I mean, we're talking about American sports media here -- the people who give us sideline reporting and ESPN suckups and know-nothings as the pinnacle of their profession. A halfway decent PR department should be able to have them for breakfast.

Companies in the entertainment biz, companies that live in the public eye, have to be PR-conscious. I get that. But they shouldn't be such PR fuckups.

And the best that can be said of all this -- not the worst, but the *best* -- is that the Packers are utter fuckups at PR.

"Wade" wrote:




You are hitting on a lot of it Wade, but also consider another factor in our various and sundry debacles of late.

It has often been said that smart management can "turn on a dime"


I have seen quite a bit of evidence that this organization has the "turning radius" outside that of the Exxon Valdez.

They just seem slow to react to just about anything. I have noticed this in public relations, in free agency, in getting contract deals done (that is not just Ted, believe me...I have researched the machinations, as best one can with public information)

When I reflect, this plodding has caused much grief of late.

Something to ponder, and I know you are an outstanding ponder er. :thumbleft:
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago




You are hitting on a lot of it Wade, but also consider another factor in our various and sundry debacles of late.

It has often been said that smart management can "turn on a dime"


I have seen quite a bit of evidence that this organization has the "turning radius" outside that of the Exxon Valdez.

They just seem slow to react to just about anything. I have noticed this in public relations, in free agency, in getting contract deals done (that is not just Ted, believe me...I have researched the machinations, as best one can with public information)

When I reflect, this plodding has caused much grief of late.

Something to ponder, and I know you are an outstanding ponder er. :thumbleft:

"dfosterf" wrote:



Good point, foster.

I've always been a plodder myself. And it has caused me an increasing level of professional grief over the years because, right or wrong, one of the key skills in today's world is speedy adaptability. And I think you're absolutely right that its especially true in management of organizations that are defined in a public sphere.

You need to play for the long haul (that's the part the Dan Snyder's of the NFL don't get), but you need to play quickly. You have to act quickly, decisively, yet somehow still make decisions that are long-run sound.

In the old world you could choose one or the other. In today's, you have to do both. You have to have the steadiness of the tortoise AND the speed of the hare.

I definitely can identify with the current GB management -- like I said, I'm a plodder by nature. I'm not management material, no way, no how.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

I am personally sick of watching my beloved franchise chastised in the press.

"pack93z" wrote:


I hear and understand that.
















---- separate note ---
When you read word for word what was said about the exchange, you will see how many newspapers and writers are twisting this into something worse than it appears.

I've went through a few posts on this page and I see contradictions while they have access to the quotes themselves. To me, that's a blatant attempt to find something to bitch about.

I guess I just don't like jumping to conclusions without doing my due diligence on it.

As I did say earlier. If the worst did happen, that this guy said something to Mike McCarthy about "don't lay an egg" or "don't choke this one away", and Mike McCarthy told his supervisor "that kind of verbal exchange is inappropriate" and he "wouldn't have that on his staff" ... which could easily be implied as to fire his ass ... I think that's more on the supervisor than mm. The coach has no bounds to fire the maintenance staff at all. Unless the Packers are lying.

In the same breathe, the Packers organization is supposed to about class, from top to bottom. Spouting off like that is not classy at all. So, let's all just feel bad for the guy who allegedly spouted off.

If Mike McCarthy pushed for the guy to be fired, I think that's wrong.
If the guy was fired for spouting off, I think that's justifiable.

To me, it's a fine line. And fact is, I don't know the whole story. I, again, know this, I'm not going to go blow a gasket on the matter without knowing what's going on. I'm going to continue blowing a gasket on our OL and Grant getting more carries than Green.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
gotarace
15 years ago
Mike McCarthy has to remember a tidbit of knowledge passed on to me when i replaced the plant manager at our business... "Big Wheels Get Pissed On By Little Dogs". His bloated ego has reached new heights here and we need to lance this boil.
Smart As a Horse
Hung Like Einstein
RaiderPride
15 years ago
One thing for sure...

If the Packers Lose On Sunday...

One of the local papers headline will be...

"Packers Lay An Egg."
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
macbob
15 years ago



Five faxes, my phone call... that shit is irrelevant. My "theory" remains that Mike McCarthy bitched about it, the guy's boss over-reacted, and shit-canned the guy.

"dfosterf" wrote:



Sounds like that is indeed what happened:

I was taken back by it, naturally. I walk through that loading dock every day, a comment was made, I comment backed, got in the car and enquired with Alan (Johnson).


you heard him say "dont lay an egg": He made a comment to me, I made a comment to him.

Did you ask for him to be fired: Absolutely not.

Did you recommend that he be fired: It was a one-minute conversation.

What did he say: It's not the worst thing I've ever heard.

Did you play a part in the decision: It's not my responsibility.

What did you say to him: he made a comment, I made a comment back to him.

"IronMan" wrote:



http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/ic/blogs/insider/index.shtml 

"dfosterf" wrote:



And he is STILL PARSING HIS WORDS.

Did you ask for him to be fired?

Answer: "Absolutely not."

Good answer.

Did you recommend that he be fired?

Answer: "It was a one-minute conversation."

Bad answer. A classic Mike McCarthy answer. He had his warning shots across the bow. No one can tell me that he is not fully briefed on the outrage that this story is generating.

He is either obfuscating or just that fucking stupid.

How about, for example...

Did you recommend that he be fired?

Answer: "Absolutely not."

See how easy that is Mike?

This smells bad.

Now look at the rest.

Did you play a part in the decision?

Answer: "It's not my responsibility."

Bad answer, again, especially in the context of the previous bad answer.

How about, for example...

Did you play a part in the decision?

Answer: "Absolutely not."

See how easy that is Mike?

This guy should be re-instated IMMEDIATELY.



What gets me is that the answers Mike McCarthy is giving are like ones I'd expect from my 13 year old boy. We constantly have discussions like this where I have to tell him "I didn't ask you how long the conversation was, I asked you, did you tell his supervisor he should be fired?" Same with the responsibility comment.

My boy gives these answers when he thinks the real answer will get him in trouble and he doesn't want to give me the real answer.

Whether he actually played a part in it or not, it lends the appearance that Mike McCarthy would like to hide the part he played. And if I find his way of dealing with this issue unacceptable in a 13 year old boy, then I certainly find them unacceptable in the head coach of the Green Bay Packers.
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago


What gets me is that the answers Mike McCarthy is giving are like ones I'd expect from my 13 year old boy. We constantly have discussions like this where I have to tell him "I didn't ask you how long the conversation was, I asked you, did you tell his supervisor he should be fired?" Same with the responsibility comment.

My boy gives these answers when he thinks the real answer will get him in trouble and he doesn't want to give me the real answer.

Whether he actually played a part in it or not, it lends the appearance that Mike McCarthy would like to hide the part he played. And if I find his way of dealing with this issue unacceptable in a 13 year old boy, then I certainly find them unacceptable in the head coach of the Green Bay Packers.

"macbob" wrote:



+1
starrgazer
15 years ago
Someone had to be fired,This guy seems like it didn't bother him to much. This is a start,now get to the off. line coach. Ican't believe that all these players are not functional. Christ, Law of averages says you have to hit once in a while. Meanwhile I think i could coach this team better than Mike,But then again if I was Prez Afghanistan would have taken about Two Weeks to end. MAYBE I'M JUST CRAZY!!!
blank
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
If you think you could have finished Afghanistan in two weeks, you clearly have not the faintest understanding of Middle Eastern political dynamics. The USSR couldn't bring Afghanistan to its knees after 15 years of occupation; what makes you think you'd know better?

/off-topic

By the way, I see you're the newest member of the forum. Welcome to the boards.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (10m) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (1h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (12h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (12h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (15h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (15h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (20h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (20h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (21h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (22h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (22h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.