Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
4PackGirl
15 years ago

Brandon Jackson is not, and won't be a feature back in the NFL.

"Tezzy" wrote:



call him what you want but i seem to recall him coming in several times last season & outperforming grant.
TheEngineer
15 years ago
Quote from McCarthy:

"There is time and time again that you just need to get out there and run it, run it ugly, run it hard, run at them, and we could probably do a little more of that," McCarthy acknowledged. "That's something we could probably do a better job of."

The problem with this is that the run isn't working. We're getting stuffed for short yardages, even though McCarthy wants to be a run first team. He needs to know when to pick his runs and I don't think this kind of inflexibility will improve our run game. Bring in Johnson and see how much of a hole he can open up. I don't give a toss if we give up an average 5 more yards on ST, if it means we establish a formidable run which opens up the passing, eats up the clock and takes pressure off the defense.
blank
porky88
15 years ago

i feel like the play calling isn't grant's best friend.

"cheeseheads123" wrote:



Word :thumbleft:

McCarthy has zero patience as a playcaller. He bails on the run way to soon. Anyone can see it.

Another knock I have against him is he's way to predictable at times. If the run does work he'll run it four or five times in a row. He needs to be balanced and mix it up. Pass, Run, Run, Pass, Pass, Run. Pass, Run or something to that extent.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
20+ carries twice for Grant this year and both of them were in 20 plus point victories.
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
15 years ago
I'm not giving up on Grant yet but he really should be doing more with the carries he gets with the passing game this team has. I'm starting to think we just need a bigger guy that can just plow some defenders and wear them down regardless of blocking instead of just a quick guy. A big slow running back would probably have at least the same average as Grant does now.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Grant would be a good running back for a team that will give him 20 touches a game or more.

A RB in McCarthy's scheme needs to be one of those rare guys who can get 10-15 touches and average 10+ yards a touch. Problem is there's not many of those backs out there.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
15 years ago
My problem with Grant has to do with yards after contact, in which he must be the worst in the league. He goes down too easily for a north - south runner. I know we will never get the exciting reverse the field runs from him, but dammit, break some tackles once in a while, Ryan.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago

My problem with Grant has to do with yards after contact, in which he must be the worst in the league. He goes down too easily for a north - south runner. I know we will never get the exciting reverse the field runs from him, but dammit, break some tackles once in a while, Ryan.

"DakotaT" wrote:



With his leaning forward style that will never happen unless it is a collision and he stays up. He goes down with arm tackles because his body is to far in front of his legs. Slow the legs down a little and there is nothing left to hold up the torso. Would like to see somebody other than Grant running, but until we get somebody he will have to do.

To get him going, he has to have a hole to get going.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Dulak
15 years ago

With 19 carries or more, the Packers are 9 wins and 4 losses.

More carries = more likely to win.

Time to run the ball more. It gives the OL a chance to smack around, instead of being smacked around and the DL won't be able to tee-off on us in the later portions of the game.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



If people dont know this about me ... I dont like grant. Dont like how he runs and dont think he should be our #1 back with 95% of the carries.

Now that out of the way ... since he is our #1 back and since Mike McCarthy gives him 95% of the carries. Even with a suffering Oline ... Mike McCarthy needs ... NEEDS to do runs to the outside. 50% of our runs should be to the outside IMO. I really dont want to see grant run (if you call it running ... more like bumping into bodies) up the middle and getting -1-3 yards.

For jacksons first game back we saw him run 2x ... oh whoopie do. The guy with the most yards per carry last season ran 2x.

I say get a different back on the team and/or start calling better running plays.
djcubez
15 years ago

With 19 carries or more, the Packers are 9 wins and 4 losses.

More carries = more likely to win.

Time to run the ball more. It gives the OL a chance to smack around, instead of being smacked around and the DL won't be able to tee-off on us in the later portions of the game.

"Dulak" wrote:



If people dont know this about me ... I dont like grant. Dont like how he runs and dont think he should be our #1 back with 95% of the carries.

Now that out of the way ... since he is our #1 back and since Mike McCarthy gives him 95% of the carries. Even with a suffering Oline ...
Mike McCarthy needs ... NEEDS to do runs to the outside. 50% of our runs should be to the outside IMO. I really dont want to see grant run (if you call it running ... more like bumping into bodies) up the middle and getting -1-3 yards.

For jacksons first game back we saw him run 2x ... oh whoopie do. The guy with the most yards per carry last season ran 2x.

I say get a different back on the team and/or start calling better running plays.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


I agree with you about Grant. I also think the 20+ carries a win stat is pretty bloated because once you're winning you just hand off the ball at the end of the game to run clock, so of course you're going to have more carries. Also I think the fact that B-Jack fumbled on one of his carries prevented him from getting more, plus it was his first game back from injury. I still wish they would have kept Sutton though...
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
    beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
    dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
    dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
    dfosterf (2-Jan) : Hats off to the Beast
    dfosterf (2-Jan) : I'm at 71.76% in pick 'em. 2nd place. Beast is at a flat 75% 9 games ahead. That 75% has got to be unprecedented this late in the season
    beast (2-Jan) : I don't care deeply, just want some good entertaining games
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : BTW, not serious.
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You don't care about it either!!!!
    Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : NIL and Portal killed college, no one cares about it.
    Mucky Tundra (2-Jan) : outside of Texas-Arizona St, it's been a snoozefest
    beast (2-Jan) : I expect Georgia will change that tomorrow, but we'll have to wait and see. If they do, then only Big 10 and SEC are left.
    beast (2-Jan) : So much for Conference Championship meaning something as 100% (so far) of the conference Champions lost their first playoff game.
    Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Jaire had surgery, season over.
    Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : I guess I need a new sig Pic. Boo
    Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : Eric Dickerson approves of this decision
    beast (1-Jan) : Eagles are resting RB Saquon Barkley, so there is no chance he breaks the record despite being just 101 yards from it
    Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Patriots are waiving veteran pass rusher Yannick Ngakoue
    beast (1-Jan) : Happy New Year's 🥳🎉
    beast (31-Dec) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
    beast (31-Dec) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
    Mucky Tundra (31-Dec) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
    Zero2Cool (31-Dec) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
    Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
    beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
    beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
    go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
    beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
    Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
    go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
    beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
    beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
    beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
    beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
    Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
    beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
    beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!
    beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    11h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

    2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    2-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

    1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    31-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    31-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

    27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.