Zero2Cool
4 years ago
Probably.

Senior Bowl executive director Jim Nagy said raved about the Packers' first-round pick, Utah State's Jordan Love.

Continue Reading @ Sports Illustrated 

Sports Illustrated wrote:


UserPostedImage
Smokey
4 years ago



UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago

For me, it was great seeing all the different kinds of throws he can make. He’s got every single pitch. He can throw with velocity, he can throw with touch, he can throw with a great trajectory down the field. It was cool to see not just throwing on air in shorts in a camp in the summertime in Louisiana.

Jim Nagy wrote:


This might be what excites me most about Love. When I watch his highlights, I see him launching the ball like a cannon, yet the ball settling like silk into the hands of his receivers (or defensive backs). It's an incredible sight to behold. My most frequent complaint about Aaron Rodgers over the years has been his all-too-frequent lack of touch, particularly in short-yardage situations. His receivers take a lot of heat for all the drops, but far too often I've felt that Rodgers blasted the ball at them much harder than was warranted, relying on his impressive arm strength to keep it out of the hands of defenders. This has no doubt helped to keep his interception numbers low, but I think it's come at the cost of failing to move the chains in key moments, forcing an increasingly exhausted defense back on the field.

I know people will tell me that receivers need to adapt to their quarterback and not the other way around, but I disagree. Football is a team sport, and adaptation should be a two-way street. Maybe with Love at the helm we'll see a change in focus away from brute strength in short- to medium-yardage situations and toward a more finesse style that's easier for receivers to handle. I can see how this could simultaneously lead to more interceptions and keep more drives alive that under Rodgers might otherwise have stalled in various frustrating ways.

Hell, all Love has to do is be willing to give his dumpoff man or his man at the marker a shot (of which in LaFleur's system there will be plenty), and he's likely to extend more drives than Rodgers has in recent years.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago
By the way, "he's got every pitch" is most definitely a not-so-subtle comparison to Patrick Mahomes. It's clear Nagy is excited about Love. Now Love is obviously not going into a situation quite as ideal as the one Mahomes fell into, but a couple years down the road, there's no telling what this roster might look like.

Totally off topic, is Alex Smith ever going to play another down in this league?
UserPostedImage
beast
4 years ago


Hell, all Love has to do is be willing to give his dumpoff man or his man at the marker a shot (of which in LaFleur's system there will be plenty), and he's likely to extend more drives than Rodgers has in recent years.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 

Yeah I think that's been my biggest disappointment, failure to change with the roster changes and not focusing on the smaller aspects enough.

I fully get that a big part of MM's system is to extend the play and look for the big shots and when you had a talented and deep group of WRs, you could do that all day, every day and be very successful.

But as the WR talents weren't being restocked (extremely important in MM's scheme with all those ISO routes, maybe less important in this scheme) you need to adjust.

I knew Rodgers was overlooking the short routes, but I guess I never knew to what extent, until a game against the Seahawks, when they quite literally, ignored the RB receiving routes unless they were over 5 yards. The RB was left alone most of the time in his routes, and with the exception of the play that looked specifically designed to get Jomes the ball on a pass (which did score a TD), the short passes were completely ignored even if uncovered. In other words, they're basically playing 10 on 11 on pass plays with a RB receiving route, that's unacceptable.


Also last year, might have shown that while Rodgers can accurately throw a 50 yard bomb tightly through three defenders (or whatever super hard throw you want to think of). Rodgers sometimes struggles to throw a 10 yard swing pass to an uncovered short route, because he hasn't practice it enough (I've heard it's feet that are off and in bad position when he tries to do that). So you can do the toughest things, but also need to work on the simple things, especially since it's now a staple of the new scheme.




[quote=Smokey;431804][YOUTUBE

Looks like you lost a "]" after Youtube

Let try it and see if that works





UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago
20 years is a big strong. Let's say 10 years. It could be 15 but I'll take 10.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago

This might be what excites me most about Love. When I watch his highlights, I see him launching the ball like a cannon, yet the ball settling like silk into the hands of his receivers (or defensive backs). It's an incredible sight to behold. My most frequent complaint about Aaron Rodgers over the years has been his all-too-frequent lack of touch, particularly in short-yardage situations. His receivers take a lot of heat for all the drops, but far too often I've felt that Rodgers blasted the ball at them much harder than was warranted, relying on his impressive arm strength to keep it out of the hands of defenders. This has no doubt helped to keep his interception numbers low, but I think it's come at the cost of failing to move the chains in key moments, forcing an increasingly exhausted defense back on the field.

I know people will tell me that receivers need to adapt to their quarterback and not the other way around, but I disagree. Football is a team sport, and adaptation should be a two-way street. Maybe with Love at the helm we'll see a change in focus away from brute strength in short- to medium-yardage situations and toward a more finesse style that's easier for receivers to handle. I can see how this could simultaneously lead to more interceptions and keep more drives alive that under Rodgers might otherwise have stalled in various frustrating ways.

Hell, all Love has to do is be willing to give his dumpoff man or his man at the marker a shot (of which in LaFleur's system there will be plenty), and he's likely to extend more drives than Rodgers has in recent years.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Brett had issues with his short passes too. The receiver could be 3 yards away and he would wing it like he was throwing a 50 yard pass. I think one of the tv dudes said Driver had broken a finger a few times because of it. Several receivers had sprained fingers each season.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago

Yeah I think that's been my biggest disappointment, failure to change with the roster changes and not focusing on the smaller aspects enough.

I fully get that a big part of MM's system is to extend the play and look for the big shots and when you had a talented and deep group of WRs, you could do that all day, every day and be very successful.

But as the WR talents weren't being restocked (extremely important in MM's scheme with all those ISO routes, maybe less important in this scheme) you need to adjust.

I knew Rodgers was overlooking the short routes, but I guess I never knew to what extent, until a game against the Seahawks, when they quite literally, ignored the RB receiving routes unless they were over 5 yards. The RB was left alone most of the time in his routes, and with the exception of the play that looked specifically designed to get Jomes the ball on a pass (which did score a TD), the short passes were completely ignored even if uncovered. In other words, they're basically playing 10 on 11 on pass plays with a RB receiving route, that's unacceptable.


Also last year, might have shown that while Rodgers can accurately throw a 50 yard bomb tightly through three defenders (or whatever super hard throw you want to think of). Rodgers sometimes struggles to throw a 10 yard swing pass to an uncovered short route, because he hasn't practice it enough (I've heard it's feet that are off and in bad position when he tries to do that). So you can do the toughest things, but also need to work on the simple things, especially since it's now a staple of the new scheme.


Originally Posted by: beast 



OH NO! nermann was right, dammit. Aaron is a stat whore. 😎
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago

Brett had issues with his short passes too.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Yep. Plenty of us have commented over the years how similar their mechanics were. There are times when if you didn't know what number was on the jersey, it would be hard to tell if it was Favre or Rodgers winging the ball. Rodgers seems to have adopted some of Favre's most notable traits while smoothing out some of his more glaring flaws. Or maybe Thompson drafted Rodgers particularly because he reminded him of Favre in some ways.

UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago
For a perfect example of the silkiness of Love's passes, watch this video, especially the pass at 0:33:





At 1:50 they talk about Love running the hurry-up offense. At 2:10 he makes a really nice block on a handoff. And of course, the pass at 9:40 is simply jaw dropping.

By the way, although Utah State lost that game, their 31 points was the most any team scored against MSU that year.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (12h) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (13h) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (16h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (16h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (16h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (16h) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (16h) : I think this games over
beast (17h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (17h) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (21h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (21h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.