Zero2Cool
4 years ago
Probably.

Senior Bowl executive director Jim Nagy said raved about the Packers' first-round pick, Utah State's Jordan Love.

Continue Reading @ Sports Illustrated 

Sports Illustrated wrote:


UserPostedImage
Smokey
4 years ago



UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago

For me, it was great seeing all the different kinds of throws he can make. He’s got every single pitch. He can throw with velocity, he can throw with touch, he can throw with a great trajectory down the field. It was cool to see not just throwing on air in shorts in a camp in the summertime in Louisiana.

Jim Nagy wrote:


This might be what excites me most about Love. When I watch his highlights, I see him launching the ball like a cannon, yet the ball settling like silk into the hands of his receivers (or defensive backs). It's an incredible sight to behold. My most frequent complaint about Aaron Rodgers over the years has been his all-too-frequent lack of touch, particularly in short-yardage situations. His receivers take a lot of heat for all the drops, but far too often I've felt that Rodgers blasted the ball at them much harder than was warranted, relying on his impressive arm strength to keep it out of the hands of defenders. This has no doubt helped to keep his interception numbers low, but I think it's come at the cost of failing to move the chains in key moments, forcing an increasingly exhausted defense back on the field.

I know people will tell me that receivers need to adapt to their quarterback and not the other way around, but I disagree. Football is a team sport, and adaptation should be a two-way street. Maybe with Love at the helm we'll see a change in focus away from brute strength in short- to medium-yardage situations and toward a more finesse style that's easier for receivers to handle. I can see how this could simultaneously lead to more interceptions and keep more drives alive that under Rodgers might otherwise have stalled in various frustrating ways.

Hell, all Love has to do is be willing to give his dumpoff man or his man at the marker a shot (of which in LaFleur's system there will be plenty), and he's likely to extend more drives than Rodgers has in recent years.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago
By the way, "he's got every pitch" is most definitely a not-so-subtle comparison to Patrick Mahomes. It's clear Nagy is excited about Love. Now Love is obviously not going into a situation quite as ideal as the one Mahomes fell into, but a couple years down the road, there's no telling what this roster might look like.

Totally off topic, is Alex Smith ever going to play another down in this league?
UserPostedImage
beast
4 years ago


Hell, all Love has to do is be willing to give his dumpoff man or his man at the marker a shot (of which in LaFleur's system there will be plenty), and he's likely to extend more drives than Rodgers has in recent years.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 

Yeah I think that's been my biggest disappointment, failure to change with the roster changes and not focusing on the smaller aspects enough.

I fully get that a big part of MM's system is to extend the play and look for the big shots and when you had a talented and deep group of WRs, you could do that all day, every day and be very successful.

But as the WR talents weren't being restocked (extremely important in MM's scheme with all those ISO routes, maybe less important in this scheme) you need to adjust.

I knew Rodgers was overlooking the short routes, but I guess I never knew to what extent, until a game against the Seahawks, when they quite literally, ignored the RB receiving routes unless they were over 5 yards. The RB was left alone most of the time in his routes, and with the exception of the play that looked specifically designed to get Jomes the ball on a pass (which did score a TD), the short passes were completely ignored even if uncovered. In other words, they're basically playing 10 on 11 on pass plays with a RB receiving route, that's unacceptable.


Also last year, might have shown that while Rodgers can accurately throw a 50 yard bomb tightly through three defenders (or whatever super hard throw you want to think of). Rodgers sometimes struggles to throw a 10 yard swing pass to an uncovered short route, because he hasn't practice it enough (I've heard it's feet that are off and in bad position when he tries to do that). So you can do the toughest things, but also need to work on the simple things, especially since it's now a staple of the new scheme.




[quote=Smokey;431804][YOUTUBE

Looks like you lost a "]" after Youtube

Let try it and see if that works





UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago
20 years is a big strong. Let's say 10 years. It could be 15 but I'll take 10.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago

This might be what excites me most about Love. When I watch his highlights, I see him launching the ball like a cannon, yet the ball settling like silk into the hands of his receivers (or defensive backs). It's an incredible sight to behold. My most frequent complaint about Aaron Rodgers over the years has been his all-too-frequent lack of touch, particularly in short-yardage situations. His receivers take a lot of heat for all the drops, but far too often I've felt that Rodgers blasted the ball at them much harder than was warranted, relying on his impressive arm strength to keep it out of the hands of defenders. This has no doubt helped to keep his interception numbers low, but I think it's come at the cost of failing to move the chains in key moments, forcing an increasingly exhausted defense back on the field.

I know people will tell me that receivers need to adapt to their quarterback and not the other way around, but I disagree. Football is a team sport, and adaptation should be a two-way street. Maybe with Love at the helm we'll see a change in focus away from brute strength in short- to medium-yardage situations and toward a more finesse style that's easier for receivers to handle. I can see how this could simultaneously lead to more interceptions and keep more drives alive that under Rodgers might otherwise have stalled in various frustrating ways.

Hell, all Love has to do is be willing to give his dumpoff man or his man at the marker a shot (of which in LaFleur's system there will be plenty), and he's likely to extend more drives than Rodgers has in recent years.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Brett had issues with his short passes too. The receiver could be 3 yards away and he would wing it like he was throwing a 50 yard pass. I think one of the tv dudes said Driver had broken a finger a few times because of it. Several receivers had sprained fingers each season.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago

Yeah I think that's been my biggest disappointment, failure to change with the roster changes and not focusing on the smaller aspects enough.

I fully get that a big part of MM's system is to extend the play and look for the big shots and when you had a talented and deep group of WRs, you could do that all day, every day and be very successful.

But as the WR talents weren't being restocked (extremely important in MM's scheme with all those ISO routes, maybe less important in this scheme) you need to adjust.

I knew Rodgers was overlooking the short routes, but I guess I never knew to what extent, until a game against the Seahawks, when they quite literally, ignored the RB receiving routes unless they were over 5 yards. The RB was left alone most of the time in his routes, and with the exception of the play that looked specifically designed to get Jomes the ball on a pass (which did score a TD), the short passes were completely ignored even if uncovered. In other words, they're basically playing 10 on 11 on pass plays with a RB receiving route, that's unacceptable.


Also last year, might have shown that while Rodgers can accurately throw a 50 yard bomb tightly through three defenders (or whatever super hard throw you want to think of). Rodgers sometimes struggles to throw a 10 yard swing pass to an uncovered short route, because he hasn't practice it enough (I've heard it's feet that are off and in bad position when he tries to do that). So you can do the toughest things, but also need to work on the simple things, especially since it's now a staple of the new scheme.


Originally Posted by: beast 



OH NO! nermann was right, dammit. Aaron is a stat whore. 😎
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago

Brett had issues with his short passes too.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Yep. Plenty of us have commented over the years how similar their mechanics were. There are times when if you didn't know what number was on the jersey, it would be hard to tell if it was Favre or Rodgers winging the ball. Rodgers seems to have adopted some of Favre's most notable traits while smoothing out some of his more glaring flaws. Or maybe Thompson drafted Rodgers particularly because he reminded him of Favre in some ways.

UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago
For a perfect example of the silkiness of Love's passes, watch this video, especially the pass at 0:33:





At 1:50 they talk about Love running the hurry-up offense. At 2:10 he makes a really nice block on a handoff. And of course, the pass at 9:40 is simply jaw dropping.

By the way, although Utah State lost that game, their 31 points was the most any team scored against MSU that year.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (6h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (8h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (8h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (8h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (10h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.