Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
beast
7 years ago

So, now Barfarn blocks me because he can't hang? Typical

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Typically people block you because you beat the same things into the ground and they get tired of it.

You know... like the Packers are stupid and me and my favorite two writers are right about everything...


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

It's obvious that a homer wants to hear only homer view points while the dissenter is open to hearing all.

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's ripped me a ton and tried making me look foolish and I continue debating with him. Why? I'm an adult who doesn't need anyone to back me. Most are too scared to be the type I am. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Again, with troll? LOL. Troll. My goodness. Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll? No. Man, you are so far off on this troll stuff.

Napoleon syndrome? Ha ha. Dakota is one of the dissenters...hardrocker...yoop will do it at times.

For the record, when you block me, that doesn't mean I don't see you...you just don't see me. You can just make me go away. I wouldn't ever block anyone. Why? Who would do such a thing? I'm not 12 years old. Nobody is hurting my feeling or bothering me that much I feel I have to resort to blocking. Blocking is a reflection of you, not me. I dissent. I strongly disagree with the homer viewpoint. I mean strongly. So, I type my posts in line with that because that's what I believe. You type what you do because that is what you believe. Are you so committed and strong in what you believe? Those who block aren't. They run. nerd ran because he has a terrible habit of making flippant completely inaccurate statements about the Packers with no backing to them whatsoever. Probably why he and Barfarn are such friends.

Again, off track here. Was McGarigle a hot commodity? Was he? I say that's bunk. Barfarn says straight truth. wpr questions Barfarn like I do. What do YOU think? Oh, right...you just think I'm a troll. That way you don't have to get involved. You can just make me the subject. That way you never have to actually debate while claiming some superiority as I'm just a troll and you're so normal when you hide from actual debate.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Your question is wrong from the start as I don't believe there is a right viewpoint, as any single viewpoint doesn't get the whole view.

Also I think you're the only person that I've called a troll. So it's quite the opposite... it's not anyone... it's just you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
I grate u more than anyone else. True?

If there is no right view why the issue? I disagree that there is no right view. Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

We can debate TT, Mike McCarthy and other things all day. That's fun and more vague.

Are you going to answer the question at hand? You seem to stick to me and not the subject.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
How easy it is for one dolt to ruin a website.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
beast
7 years ago

I grate u more than anyone else. True?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.

You seem to stick to me and not the subject.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Nope. Not on purpose.

Who dissents more strongly than I do? That has everything to do with this issue.

No one person can ruin a forum. That is merely your perception. All of you don't ruin it for me. I suppose it can be ruined if you have an agenda and I inhibit it.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
7 years ago

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's...making me look foolish. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.

Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I never said you'd be blocked or wpr! Your "research" is flawed as is your reading comprehension.

You're not articulate either: A fact is something that can be proven true or false. This is pseudo-intellectual argument. A coach having ten job offers is a fact; a coach being a hot commodity is not a fact because it cant be proven true or false. One may see a college LB coach as "hot" just for getting a call from Packers.

Let me add another: your argument is duplicitous. You demand "proof" from others [and Lovie's Smith comment is extremely strong evidence to that end]; but you provide no proof to support your contention that Lovie is outright lying. Again, if you want proof...YOU FIRST!

We're still laughing over here about your "analysis" in the thread where you say being a GM is easy, because your eyeball test is so reliable. I haven't responded to that yet, because we sent some of your Ted is an idiot posts to 1265 along with your "articulate" and "researched" Ted didn't go to no GM school and eyeball test stuff. We're trying to gather PROOF as to the efficacy of your statements. We've asked among other things, using your comments, why GB spends so much on a scouting department. Seems unnecessary given your "articulate research." When we hear back we'll respond.

Heck, it can be expected, if 1265 can fire the entire scouting staff and hire you for 7.85/hr, then I can report that you are a rising star and a hot commodity. Oh and if GB offers you a job, I bet other franchises will too. Someone may even go as high as 7.99/hr for your services.
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (1h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (2h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (2h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (2h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (3h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (3h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (6h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (14h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (20h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (22h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

39m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

40m / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.