beast
7 years ago

So, now Barfarn blocks me because he can't hang? Typical

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Typically people block you because you beat the same things into the ground and they get tired of it.

You know... like the Packers are stupid and me and my favorite two writers are right about everything...


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

It's obvious that a homer wants to hear only homer view points while the dissenter is open to hearing all.

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's ripped me a ton and tried making me look foolish and I continue debating with him. Why? I'm an adult who doesn't need anyone to back me. Most are too scared to be the type I am. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Again, with troll? LOL. Troll. My goodness. Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll? No. Man, you are so far off on this troll stuff.

Napoleon syndrome? Ha ha. Dakota is one of the dissenters...hardrocker...yoop will do it at times.

For the record, when you block me, that doesn't mean I don't see you...you just don't see me. You can just make me go away. I wouldn't ever block anyone. Why? Who would do such a thing? I'm not 12 years old. Nobody is hurting my feeling or bothering me that much I feel I have to resort to blocking. Blocking is a reflection of you, not me. I dissent. I strongly disagree with the homer viewpoint. I mean strongly. So, I type my posts in line with that because that's what I believe. You type what you do because that is what you believe. Are you so committed and strong in what you believe? Those who block aren't. They run. nerd ran because he has a terrible habit of making flippant completely inaccurate statements about the Packers with no backing to them whatsoever. Probably why he and Barfarn are such friends.

Again, off track here. Was McGarigle a hot commodity? Was he? I say that's bunk. Barfarn says straight truth. wpr questions Barfarn like I do. What do YOU think? Oh, right...you just think I'm a troll. That way you don't have to get involved. You can just make me the subject. That way you never have to actually debate while claiming some superiority as I'm just a troll and you're so normal when you hide from actual debate.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Your question is wrong from the start as I don't believe there is a right viewpoint, as any single viewpoint doesn't get the whole view.

Also I think you're the only person that I've called a troll. So it's quite the opposite... it's not anyone... it's just you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
I grate u more than anyone else. True?

If there is no right view why the issue? I disagree that there is no right view. Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

We can debate TT, Mike McCarthy and other things all day. That's fun and more vague.

Are you going to answer the question at hand? You seem to stick to me and not the subject.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
How easy it is for one dolt to ruin a website.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
beast
7 years ago

I grate u more than anyone else. True?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.

You seem to stick to me and not the subject.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Nope. Not on purpose.

Who dissents more strongly than I do? That has everything to do with this issue.

No one person can ruin a forum. That is merely your perception. All of you don't ruin it for me. I suppose it can be ruined if you have an agenda and I inhibit it.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
7 years ago

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's...making me look foolish. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.

Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I never said you'd be blocked or wpr! Your "research" is flawed as is your reading comprehension.

You're not articulate either: A fact is something that can be proven true or false. This is pseudo-intellectual argument. A coach having ten job offers is a fact; a coach being a hot commodity is not a fact because it cant be proven true or false. One may see a college LB coach as "hot" just for getting a call from Packers.

Let me add another: your argument is duplicitous. You demand "proof" from others [and Lovie's Smith comment is extremely strong evidence to that end]; but you provide no proof to support your contention that Lovie is outright lying. Again, if you want proof...YOU FIRST!

We're still laughing over here about your "analysis" in the thread where you say being a GM is easy, because your eyeball test is so reliable. I haven't responded to that yet, because we sent some of your Ted is an idiot posts to 1265 along with your "articulate" and "researched" Ted didn't go to no GM school and eyeball test stuff. We're trying to gather PROOF as to the efficacy of your statements. We've asked among other things, using your comments, why GB spends so much on a scouting department. Seems unnecessary given your "articulate research." When we hear back we'll respond.

Heck, it can be expected, if 1265 can fire the entire scouting staff and hire you for 7.85/hr, then I can report that you are a rising star and a hot commodity. Oh and if GB offers you a job, I bet other franchises will too. Someone may even go as high as 7.99/hr for your services.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (19h) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Jaire and Evans Williams are both ACTIVE! Good news.
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : The badgers really need to change the whole offensive scheme. No draws no screens plus the quarterback is marginal
Cheesey (17-Nov) : If the Badgers had a decent QB, they would have won. The guy can't hit a wide open receiver
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : chop block
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : there was a very questionable job Block call that upon viewing replay was very borderline
beast (17-Nov) : How so? (I didn't watch)
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Badgers got hosed vs Oregon
packerfanoutwest (16-Nov) : damn,he hasn't played since week 2
Mucky Tundra (15-Nov) : poor guy can't catch a break
wpr (15-Nov) : wow. That three different things for the kid.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.