"fired" is a harsh term. your research is off.[whead]

They were all hired by Cubit in 2016 before he got replaced late by Smith and all were paid for 2016. Scheelhaase stayed in analytics with the team; Bellamy hung around campus and worked with Geronimo among others; Seamonson saw through the recruitment of G. President and so forth.

Lovie had his favorites, and these poor schmucks lost their coaching jobs. Surely Lovie was asked and said positive things about them. But, had he called any of them "rising stars" that would have been published.

But, all this aside, if you let go a "rising star" it means your new guy is even better than a rising star. Now that should cause a super PR boom if your theory holds true that calling McGarigle a "rising star" was only done for PR purposes.

FACT: McGarigle is a rising star....[assho] [horseow] [bdance] [zipmouth] [zipmouth] [zipmouth] [zipmouth] [zipmouth]

If they were rising stars he would've retained them. Not called them rising stars while letting them go. My goodness

---

didn't mean to post here

---

Can of worms

---

I got a HUGE smile on my face thinking of why this post had made it's way back to the top of the forum. I'm not surprised by who brought it back. :)

EDIT: It's good you brought this one back. Do you understand what happened in this post? You brought it back to try and prove how awful I am? What this post was about was someone MAKING SOMETHING UP because it was a Packers move, so, therefore had to be more than it was. Wayne and I called him on it and he never ever answered the charge. He just slammed Wayne and I. A good example of how being objective causes one to ask pertinent questions like...If he was so hot, how come not one of the other 28 teams eliminated from the playoffs before us went after him? A fair question by a fair objective point of view. It is upsetting to see someone do what was done here, so it had to be called out, and it was.

---

Let it go uffda. It's not worth the effort.

---