beast
8 years ago

So, now Barfarn blocks me because he can't hang? Typical

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Typically people block you because you beat the same things into the ground and they get tired of it.

You know... like the Packers are stupid and me and my favorite two writers are right about everything...


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago
I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

It's obvious that a homer wants to hear only homer view points while the dissenter is open to hearing all.

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's ripped me a ton and tried making me look foolish and I continue debating with him. Why? I'm an adult who doesn't need anyone to back me. Most are too scared to be the type I am. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
8 years ago

you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Again, with troll? LOL. Troll. My goodness. Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll? No. Man, you are so far off on this troll stuff.

Napoleon syndrome? Ha ha. Dakota is one of the dissenters...hardrocker...yoop will do it at times.

For the record, when you block me, that doesn't mean I don't see you...you just don't see me. You can just make me go away. I wouldn't ever block anyone. Why? Who would do such a thing? I'm not 12 years old. Nobody is hurting my feeling or bothering me that much I feel I have to resort to blocking. Blocking is a reflection of you, not me. I dissent. I strongly disagree with the homer viewpoint. I mean strongly. So, I type my posts in line with that because that's what I believe. You type what you do because that is what you believe. Are you so committed and strong in what you believe? Those who block aren't. They run. nerd ran because he has a terrible habit of making flippant completely inaccurate statements about the Packers with no backing to them whatsoever. Probably why he and Barfarn are such friends.

Again, off track here. Was McGarigle a hot commodity? Was he? I say that's bunk. Barfarn says straight truth. wpr questions Barfarn like I do. What do YOU think? Oh, right...you just think I'm a troll. That way you don't have to get involved. You can just make me the subject. That way you never have to actually debate while claiming some superiority as I'm just a troll and you're so normal when you hide from actual debate.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
8 years ago

Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Your question is wrong from the start as I don't believe there is a right viewpoint, as any single viewpoint doesn't get the whole view.

Also I think you're the only person that I've called a troll. So it's quite the opposite... it's not anyone... it's just you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago
I grate u more than anyone else. True?

If there is no right view why the issue? I disagree that there is no right view. Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

We can debate TT, MM and other things all day. That's fun and more vague.

Are you going to answer the question at hand? You seem to stick to me and not the subject.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
8 years ago
How easy it is for one dolt to ruin a website.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
beast
8 years ago

I grate u more than anyone else. True?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.

You seem to stick to me and not the subject.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Nope. Not on purpose.

Who dissents more strongly than I do? That has everything to do with this issue.

No one person can ruin a forum. That is merely your perception. All of you don't ruin it for me. I suppose it can be ruined if you have an agenda and I inhibit it.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
8 years ago

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's...making me look foolish. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.

Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I never said you'd be blocked or wpr! Your "research" is flawed as is your reading comprehension.

You're not articulate either: A fact is something that can be proven true or false. This is pseudo-intellectual argument. A coach having ten job offers is a fact; a coach being a hot commodity is not a fact because it cant be proven true or false. One may see a college LB coach as "hot" just for getting a call from Packers.

Let me add another: your argument is duplicitous. You demand "proof" from others [and Lovie's Smith comment is extremely strong evidence to that end]; but you provide no proof to support your contention that Lovie is outright lying. Again, if you want proof...YOU FIRST!

We're still laughing over here about your "analysis" in the thread where you say being a GM is easy, because your eyeball test is so reliable. I haven't responded to that yet, because we sent some of your Ted is an idiot posts to 1265 along with your "articulate" and "researched" Ted didn't go to no GM school and eyeball test stuff. We're trying to gather PROOF as to the efficacy of your statements. We've asked among other things, using your comments, why GB spends so much on a scouting department. Seems unnecessary given your "articulate research." When we hear back we'll respond.

Heck, it can be expected, if 1265 can fire the entire scouting staff and hire you for 7.85/hr, then I can report that you are a rising star and a hot commodity. Oh and if GB offers you a job, I bet other franchises will too. Someone may even go as high as 7.99/hr for your services.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (56m) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (2h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (2h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (3h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (4h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (20h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.