beast
7 years ago

So, now Barfarn blocks me because he can't hang? Typical

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Typically people block you because you beat the same things into the ground and they get tired of it.

You know... like the Packers are stupid and me and my favorite two writers are right about everything...


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

It's obvious that a homer wants to hear only homer view points while the dissenter is open to hearing all.

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's ripped me a ton and tried making me look foolish and I continue debating with him. Why? I'm an adult who doesn't need anyone to back me. Most are too scared to be the type I am. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Seriously? You have some sort of napoleon syndrome... you keep putting yourself on a lone pedestal.

There are multiple dissenter... and if you can't see them... then that's probably because they have blocked you as well.... as you're much more inline with troll than any of the other dissenters... or other posters even.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Again, with troll? LOL. Troll. My goodness. Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll? No. Man, you are so far off on this troll stuff.

Napoleon syndrome? Ha ha. Dakota is one of the dissenters...hardrocker...yoop will do it at times.

For the record, when you block me, that doesn't mean I don't see you...you just don't see me. You can just make me go away. I wouldn't ever block anyone. Why? Who would do such a thing? I'm not 12 years old. Nobody is hurting my feeling or bothering me that much I feel I have to resort to blocking. Blocking is a reflection of you, not me. I dissent. I strongly disagree with the homer viewpoint. I mean strongly. So, I type my posts in line with that because that's what I believe. You type what you do because that is what you believe. Are you so committed and strong in what you believe? Those who block aren't. They run. nerd ran because he has a terrible habit of making flippant completely inaccurate statements about the Packers with no backing to them whatsoever. Probably why he and Barfarn are such friends.

Again, off track here. Was McGarigle a hot commodity? Was he? I say that's bunk. Barfarn says straight truth. wpr questions Barfarn like I do. What do YOU think? Oh, right...you just think I'm a troll. That way you don't have to get involved. You can just make me the subject. That way you never have to actually debate while claiming some superiority as I'm just a troll and you're so normal when you hide from actual debate.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

Anyone who is counter to your "right" viewpoint must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Your question is wrong from the start as I don't believe there is a right viewpoint, as any single viewpoint doesn't get the whole view.

Also I think you're the only person that I've called a troll. So it's quite the opposite... it's not anyone... it's just you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
I grate u more than anyone else. True?

If there is no right view why the issue? I disagree that there is no right view. Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

We can debate TT, Mike McCarthy and other things all day. That's fun and more vague.

Are you going to answer the question at hand? You seem to stick to me and not the subject.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
How easy it is for one dolt to ruin a website.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
beast
7 years ago

I grate u more than anyone else. True?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.

You seem to stick to me and not the subject.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think you grate almost everyone on here more than anyone else.
The question is weather you do it on purpose or not.


That's because (as many other have also stated) talking about the subject with you is completely and totally useless.

And no it has nothing to with the bullshit about you having a dissenter viewpoint, because as you have stated, others have that viewpoint too... and people don't react to them anything like they react like you.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Nope. Not on purpose.

Who dissents more strongly than I do? That has everything to do with this issue.

No one person can ruin a forum. That is merely your perception. All of you don't ruin it for me. I suppose it can be ruined if you have an agenda and I inhibit it.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
7 years ago

Barfarn was exposed as fraudulent and remedied the situation he created by blocking me for blowing the whistle with wpr. He's...making me look foolish. I'm strong in my conviction and articulate and researched. Bring your worst. Don't care. Just sad some can't hang.

Take this thread. Either McGarigle was a hot commodity or he wasn't. It's not a view it's a fact one way or the other.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I never said you'd be blocked or wpr! Your "research" is flawed as is your reading comprehension.

You're not articulate either: A fact is something that can be proven true or false. This is pseudo-intellectual argument. A coach having ten job offers is a fact; a coach being a hot commodity is not a fact because it cant be proven true or false. One may see a college LB coach as "hot" just for getting a call from Packers.

Let me add another: your argument is duplicitous. You demand "proof" from others [and Lovie's Smith comment is extremely strong evidence to that end]; but you provide no proof to support your contention that Lovie is outright lying. Again, if you want proof...YOU FIRST!

We're still laughing over here about your "analysis" in the thread where you say being a GM is easy, because your eyeball test is so reliable. I haven't responded to that yet, because we sent some of your Ted is an idiot posts to 1265 along with your "articulate" and "researched" Ted didn't go to no GM school and eyeball test stuff. We're trying to gather PROOF as to the efficacy of your statements. We've asked among other things, using your comments, why GB spends so much on a scouting department. Seems unnecessary given your "articulate research." When we hear back we'll respond.

Heck, it can be expected, if 1265 can fire the entire scouting staff and hire you for 7.85/hr, then I can report that you are a rising star and a hot commodity. Oh and if GB offers you a job, I bet other franchises will too. Someone may even go as high as 7.99/hr for your services.
Fan Shout
beast (11h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (11h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (21h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (21h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (23h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.