Zero2Cool
11 years ago
The Patriots are better because they adapt to their personnel. The Packers seem to stubbornly try to change players to fit their scheme instead of playing to their players strengths.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
11 years ago
Plus they have Tom Brady. What else do you need? Patriots have actually been pretty average to below average as far as defense for years now, but never quite as crazy bad as we have had the tendency of being.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
hardrocker950
11 years ago

Plus they have Tom Brady. What else do you need? Patriots have actually been pretty average to below average as far as defense for years now, but never quite as crazy bad as we have had the tendency of being.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



If we had a consistently average-ish D, threads like this wouldn't be so popular. As in the example of the Pats - you don't often hear people bashing their D, because they don't shit the bed regularly.

All this team really needs is a defense that can hold their own and play fundamentally sound football. The offense is good enough that they shouldn't have to be exceptional every week on D to win most games. Most of the players we need are there, just a handful of guys that could use an upgrade. Get those and a quality DC and we should be a lot better.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Defense forced three 3 and outs.

START	QTR	POSS.	YARD	PLAYS	YARDS	RESULT
15:00	1	01:37	GB 42	3	7	Punt
05:43	1	03:36	CHI 20	8	80	Touchdown
14:21	2	01:25	CHI 20	3	5	Punt
07:59	2	01:39	CHI 10	3	0	Punt
03:28	2	01:41	CHI 15	4	27	Fumble
13:18	3	02:32	GB 30	5	30	Touchdown
07:27	3	02:23	CHI 26	4	74	Touchdown
03:27	3	03:32	CHI 32	7	68	Touchdown
11:38	4	05:06	CHI 26	8	29	Punt
00:38	4	00:38	CHI 40	4	15	End of Half

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago
He still should be fired. 1 game doesn't count one way or the other.

But in yesterday's game-
Cutler has a 103.8 rating. It would have been higher except for the incompletions and int on the last drive.
Forte had a 5 yard per carry average. That is with 22 attempts. Ridiculous. Bush only carried twice and he had a 5.5. avg.
Only 1 sack. I know there were a few pressures but there could have and should have been more with the weak OL of the Bears that was made even more so when the RG left.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
10 years ago

He still should be fired. 1 game doesn't count one way or the other.

But in yesterday's game-
Cutler has a 103.8 rating. It would have been higher except for the incompletions and int on the last drive.
Forte had a 5 yard per carry average. That is with 22 attempts. Ridiculous. Bush only carried twice and he had a 5.5. avg.
Only 1 sack. I know there were a few pressures but there could have and should have been more with the weak OL of the Bears that was made even more so when the RG left.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



[mfing] [mfing] [mfing] [ass]

Now how in the hell do you expect the rah rah boys around here to jacked up to play the 49ers after laying all these facts out for them to digest? Jesus Christ, might as well just take away their birthdays while you're at it.

[roflmao] [roflmao] [roflmao]
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago
I still look and question, is the coaching the problem, or is it the players not executing. We gave up some big runs because Lattimore was out of position in his run responsibility. We gave up receptions because coverage wasn't there. How much of that can you blame Capers for? Is McCarthy to blame for Rodgers throwing INT or players dropping balls?


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DakotaT
10 years ago

I still look and question, is the coaching the problem, or is it the players not executing. We gave up some big runs because Lattimore was out of position in his run responsibility. We gave up receptions because coverage wasn't there. How much of that can you blame Capers for? Is McCarthy to blame for Rodgers throwing INT or players dropping balls?

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Most of us want a top ten defense. Year in a year out, we are just not getting that done under Capers. It's not Capers fault that Raji turned into a turd, it isn't his fault the Casey Hayward was injured all year, or that Matthews has missed so much time. It is his fault that proper adjustments aren't made. If you load Capers up, he's capable - but that's not the measure of a good coach. Getting it done when the chips are down is. This is where Capers fails miserably.
UserPostedImage
play2win
10 years ago

He still should be fired. 1 game doesn't count one way or the other.

But in yesterday's game-
Cutler has a 103.8 rating. It would have been higher except for the incompletions and int on the last drive.
Forte had a 5 yard per carry average. That is with 22 attempts. Ridiculous. Bush only carried twice and he had a 5.5. avg.
Only 1 sack. I know there were a few pressures but there could have and should have been more with the weak OL of the Bears that was made even more so when the RG left.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



It has been a dicey issue, for years. Dakota called for his head, and so did I and many others here. The one thing that I always wonder about though, is the players we have on board. We've been in need of Safety upgrades for 3 years now, and the issue has primarily gone unaddressed.

Is this really Capers' fault? There are other areas on this D that has been deficient in terms of talent. I'm struggling to see that the blame lies solely with Capers in this regard.

Statistically, we've been horrid on D. But, like hardrocker said, we don't necessarily have to be all that great, just good enough to get the job done. I'm wondering if we might be able to do that, and make the real run to a 5th Lombardi Trophy… I mean, if we are going to better our defensive play, stats and standing, we could not pick a better time to do that than now.

If Dom Capers can get this bunch to play lights out and help us win in the playoffs, then my hat will be off to him. We'll see what happens. I'm hoping to be eating a giant plate of crow...
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago

Most of us want a top ten defense. Year in a year out, we are just not getting that done under Capers. It's not Capers fault that Raji turned into a turd, it isn't his fault the Casey Hayward was injured all year, or that Matthews has missed so much time. It is his fault that proper adjustments aren't made. If you load Capers up, he's capable - but that's not the measure of a good coach. Getting it done when the chips are down is. This is where Capers fails miserably.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



What adjustments should he have made? He has played, pretty much every player he has available in different combinations. I don't know what else schematically he could do.

I could see saying he needs to be replaced because the players are not responding to him anymore possibly.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (45m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (46m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (58m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (3h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (3h) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (3h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (3h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (7h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (9h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (10h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    8h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.