warhawk
15 years ago

Want the only stat that matter to me in this little debate you guys have going.

9-7 to ?-9.

If you look at the season records of each QB.. Brett only had one losing one.. Rodgers has his quota full already.

QB's get more glory or blame than they deserve.. but if you insist on comparing them endlessly.. wins are what matter in the end.. did you find a way to win more than you lose.

It is arguable that this team, the 08 team had more talent than the early 90's teams.

I expect Rodgers and the Packers to bounce back win wise next season.. the kid has a poise about him and some fire burning within him.. I think this losing season might be something that drives him going forward.. kind of a hidden blessing to ensure a long and prosperous career.

"pack93z" wrote:



and hopefully a better than lousy playoff record too. I think also there is more to it than wins although that is how the general public will look at it.

This year for example. What is different from last years 13-3 team numbers wise?

Was there a big drop off in:
Passing yards-nope
Passing percentage-nope
Passing TDs-nope
INt/s-nope
Passing first downs-nope

Was there a drop off in:
Close games where the D held on-yep
points allowed-yep
sacks-big yep
pressures-big yep

overall punting-yep
kick coverage-yep

I find it kind of ironic that the one position where the numbers are very parrallel to last year is in the QB spot and that last years QB did about what this years did numbers wise but people have all these questions about this QB.

I mean statistics over a couple of games can be misleading but numbers over basically an entire year tell many more truths than lies. The truth is here we have gotten the same basic production out of the QB but we have failed to match the production in a lot of other areas from last year.

I guess what I am saying is a lot of the barking may be going up the wrong tree. All I know is when I go into statistics and click on "Passing Offense" the Green Bay Packers are higher up there than I would have imagined going into this season.
"The train is leaving the station."
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago
I guess I don't understand why we're still comparing the two, especially in terms of this season. Their respective situations are too different to do that, IMO.

But what the hell - maybe this is all a part of the process of purging the whole Favre Fiasco from our collective system, or something. Seems like an endless circular argument to me, but if it has to happen, okay.
blank
Pack93z
15 years ago
Warhawk.. I agree there is more to in than wins.. but in the end, the team and their perceived leader as a QB will be judged up that.

Just win Baby.

Team to me... top of the organization to the water boy on the sidelines.. if you have breakdowns anywhere in the process we see the effects on Sunday.

That is the nuts and bolts of it.. the makeup of this team this year just didn't have enough to win more than they lost.

That is the end game.. the dynamics are countless.. but those two series of numbers is all we see.

I love the underbelly stuff.. the x's and o's of the game more than I like the end results.. and I can tell you this year that was we have lots we can build upon but a number of things that need work.

Confidence and swagger being one.. fundamentals and focus being another.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

did you find a way to win more than you lose.

"pack93z" wrote:



That's what is so fundamentally wrong with this argument. It accepts the premise that ultimately, the QB is the one who finds the victory, rather than the team as the unit.

I'd be curious to see a statistical analysis of every game of Favre's career and see how many of them he objectively "won."

But it wouldn't matter. The fanatics would give him the credit for engineering every victory anyway. It's so boring.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
15 years ago

did you find a way to win more than you lose.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



That's what is so fundamentally wrong with this argument. It accepts the premise that ultimately, the QB is the one who finds the victory, rather than the team as the unit.

I'd be curious to see a statistical analysis of every game of Favre's career and see how many of them he objectively "won."

But it wouldn't matter. The fanatics would give him the credit for engineering every victory anyway. It's so boring.

"pack93z" wrote:



If ever a year showed you win as a team and lose as a team it's this year for the Packers. How many games did Rodgers walk off the field late in the game with a lead only to stand on the sidelines and watch the defense piss it away?

Of course I never have bought into that "judge the QB by his wins" crap anyhow. I thought one of Brett Favre's best years was '05 when he was out there slinging it all over the place with nearly every good player we had sitting on the sidelines hurt. He showed courage and leadership and never gave up and I rooted louder and harder for him that year than in some when we made the playoffs.

I thought Brett Favre walked off the field a "winner" way more often in '05 than any won/loss record shows but hey, that's me. Not everyone probably feels the same I'm sure.
"The train is leaving the station."
Pack93z
15 years ago


If ever a year showed you win as a team and lose as a team it's this year for the Packers. How many games did Rodgers walk off the field late in the game with a lead only to stand on the sidelines and watch the defense piss it away?

"warhawk" wrote:



Curious, how many times did Rodgers lead a drive that would have put a cushion on the lead late in a game?

I haven't looked it up or tried to be cute.. I really wonder how many times Rodgers and this offense had an opportunity to seal away a victory with an additional score late.. instead of playing the we can't stop the routine on defense.

I don't pin the losses to Rodgers alone.. we as a team didn't pick each other up when the other segment failed. And neither the offense or the defense gave the other a margin of breathing room.. minus one game.. the Bears game. Neither unit ran hot together.. if the defense was on.. the offense struggled.. or vicey versey.. it never clicked.

I like the future of the Packers.. without a doubt, we have work to do and points of players games that need refining and growth.

As a board, we seem to think anytime a player is criticized that it is throwing them under the bus.. when in fact it is merely a acknowledgment of areas of the game in which it can be improved upon.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I think the intellectual quality of our discussions would rise exponentially if every post containing the phrase "Brett Favre" or any permutation thereof (outside the appropriate section, obviously) were automatically screened out.

Yes, I'm an asshole for saying this. Yes, I'm comfortable with that.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
15 years ago
You aren't an asshole. We are all just ticked off that our team sucks right now. We just need to win the last two games.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
warhawk
15 years ago


If ever a year showed you win as a team and lose as a team it's this year for the Packers. How many games did Rodgers walk off the field late in the game with a lead only to stand on the sidelines and watch the defense piss it away?

"pack93z" wrote:



Curious, how many times did Rodgers lead a drive that would have put a cushion on the lead late in a game?

I haven't looked it up or tried to be cute.. I really wonder how many times Rodgers and this offense had an opportunity to seal away a victory with an additional score late.. instead of playing the we can't stop the routine on defense.

I don't pin the losses to Rodgers alone.. we as a team didn't pick each other up when the other segment failed. And neither the offense or the defense gave the other a margin of breathing room.. minus one game.. the Bears game. Neither unit ran hot together.. if the defense was on.. the offense struggled.. or vicey versey.. it never clicked.

I like the future of the Packers.. without a doubt, we have work to do and points of players games that need refining and growth.

As a board, we seem to think anytime a player is criticized that it is throwing them under the bus.. when in fact it is merely a acknowledgment of areas of the game in which it can be improved upon.

"warhawk" wrote:



Well, we averaged 26.5 points a game which I would think would be enough, don't you? Regardless of what drive they got them.
"The train is leaving the station."
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I would be curious to know if a team that has scored as much as the Packers have this season has ever had such a bad record in the history of the NFL.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Tomorrow high 32° and low 19°
beast (7h) : Thanks Mucky!
Mucky Tundra (10h) : beast, forecast is looking like 27-28 degrees at kickoff, slight chance of snow flurries
Zero2Cool (13h) : Oh? It wasn't on the injury report. That sucks, but it's what is best.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : Doubs is out due to concussion
beast (16h) : What does the weather look like?
Martha Careful (20h) : You can wear long-johns mittens and a hat. We want Hill and their other skill guys FROZEN
Zero2Cool (26-Nov) : I'm not sure I hope for that. I'll be at the game.
Martha Careful (25-Nov) : I hope it is colder than a well-diggers ass on Thanksgiving night.
Zero2Cool (25-Nov) : doubt he wants to face the speedsters
beast (25-Nov) : Dolphins offense can be explosive... I wonder if we'll have Alexander back
Zero2Cool (25-Nov) : No Doubs could be issue Thursday
Mucky Tundra (25-Nov) : Bears. Santos. Blocked FG
Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : Bears. Vikings. OT
Mucky Tundra (24-Nov) : Thems the breaks I guess
Mucky Tundra (24-Nov) : Two players out and Williams had an injury designation this week but Oladapo is a healthy scratch
Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : Packers inactives vs 49ers: • CB Jaire Alexander • S Kitan Oladapo • LB Edgerrin Cooper • OL Jacob Monk
TheKanataThrilla (24-Nov) : Aaron Jones with a costly red zone fumble
Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : When we trade Malik for a 1st rounder, we'll need a new QB2.
packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : Report: Aaron Rodgers wants to play in 2025, but not for the Jets
beast (23-Nov) : That's what I told the Police officer about my speed when he pulled me over
packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : NFL told Bears that Packers’ blocked field goal was legal
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites
Zero2Cool (22-Nov) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13h / Featured Content / Martha Careful

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Nov / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

23-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

23-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.