warhawk
16 years ago

Want the only stat that matter to me in this little debate you guys have going.

9-7 to ?-9.

If you look at the season records of each QB.. Brett only had one losing one.. Rodgers has his quota full already.

QB's get more glory or blame than they deserve.. but if you insist on comparing them endlessly.. wins are what matter in the end.. did you find a way to win more than you lose.

It is arguable that this team, the 08 team had more talent than the early 90's teams.

I expect Rodgers and the Packers to bounce back win wise next season.. the kid has a poise about him and some fire burning within him.. I think this losing season might be something that drives him going forward.. kind of a hidden blessing to ensure a long and prosperous career.

"pack93z" wrote:



and hopefully a better than lousy playoff record too. I think also there is more to it than wins although that is how the general public will look at it.

This year for example. What is different from last years 13-3 team numbers wise?

Was there a big drop off in:
Passing yards-nope
Passing percentage-nope
Passing TDs-nope
INt/s-nope
Passing first downs-nope

Was there a drop off in:
Close games where the D held on-yep
points allowed-yep
sacks-big yep
pressures-big yep

overall punting-yep
kick coverage-yep

I find it kind of ironic that the one position where the numbers are very parrallel to last year is in the QB spot and that last years QB did about what this years did numbers wise but people have all these questions about this QB.

I mean statistics over a couple of games can be misleading but numbers over basically an entire year tell many more truths than lies. The truth is here we have gotten the same basic production out of the QB but we have failed to match the production in a lot of other areas from last year.

I guess what I am saying is a lot of the barking may be going up the wrong tree. All I know is when I go into statistics and click on "Passing Offense" the Green Bay Packers are higher up there than I would have imagined going into this season.
"The train is leaving the station."
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago
I guess I don't understand why we're still comparing the two, especially in terms of this season. Their respective situations are too different to do that, IMO.

But what the hell - maybe this is all a part of the process of purging the whole Favre Fiasco from our collective system, or something. Seems like an endless circular argument to me, but if it has to happen, okay.
blank
Pack93z
16 years ago
Warhawk.. I agree there is more to in than wins.. but in the end, the team and their perceived leader as a QB will be judged up that.

Just win Baby.

Team to me... top of the organization to the water boy on the sidelines.. if you have breakdowns anywhere in the process we see the effects on Sunday.

That is the nuts and bolts of it.. the makeup of this team this year just didn't have enough to win more than they lost.

That is the end game.. the dynamics are countless.. but those two series of numbers is all we see.

I love the underbelly stuff.. the x's and o's of the game more than I like the end results.. and I can tell you this year that was we have lots we can build upon but a number of things that need work.

Confidence and swagger being one.. fundamentals and focus being another.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago

did you find a way to win more than you lose.

"pack93z" wrote:



That's what is so fundamentally wrong with this argument. It accepts the premise that ultimately, the QB is the one who finds the victory, rather than the team as the unit.

I'd be curious to see a statistical analysis of every game of Favre's career and see how many of them he objectively "won."

But it wouldn't matter. The fanatics would give him the credit for engineering every victory anyway. It's so boring.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
16 years ago

did you find a way to win more than you lose.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



That's what is so fundamentally wrong with this argument. It accepts the premise that ultimately, the QB is the one who finds the victory, rather than the team as the unit.

I'd be curious to see a statistical analysis of every game of Favre's career and see how many of them he objectively "won."

But it wouldn't matter. The fanatics would give him the credit for engineering every victory anyway. It's so boring.

"pack93z" wrote:



If ever a year showed you win as a team and lose as a team it's this year for the Packers. How many games did Rodgers walk off the field late in the game with a lead only to stand on the sidelines and watch the defense piss it away?

Of course I never have bought into that "judge the QB by his wins" crap anyhow. I thought one of Brett Favre's best years was '05 when he was out there slinging it all over the place with nearly every good player we had sitting on the sidelines hurt. He showed courage and leadership and never gave up and I rooted louder and harder for him that year than in some when we made the playoffs.

I thought Brett Favre walked off the field a "winner" way more often in '05 than any won/loss record shows but hey, that's me. Not everyone probably feels the same I'm sure.
"The train is leaving the station."
Pack93z
16 years ago


If ever a year showed you win as a team and lose as a team it's this year for the Packers. How many games did Rodgers walk off the field late in the game with a lead only to stand on the sidelines and watch the defense piss it away?

"warhawk" wrote:



Curious, how many times did Rodgers lead a drive that would have put a cushion on the lead late in a game?

I haven't looked it up or tried to be cute.. I really wonder how many times Rodgers and this offense had an opportunity to seal away a victory with an additional score late.. instead of playing the we can't stop the routine on defense.

I don't pin the losses to Rodgers alone.. we as a team didn't pick each other up when the other segment failed. And neither the offense or the defense gave the other a margin of breathing room.. minus one game.. the Bears game. Neither unit ran hot together.. if the defense was on.. the offense struggled.. or vicey versey.. it never clicked.

I like the future of the Packers.. without a doubt, we have work to do and points of players games that need refining and growth.

As a board, we seem to think anytime a player is criticized that it is throwing them under the bus.. when in fact it is merely a acknowledgment of areas of the game in which it can be improved upon.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago
I think the intellectual quality of our discussions would rise exponentially if every post containing the phrase "Brett Favre" or any permutation thereof (outside the appropriate section, obviously) were automatically screened out.

Yes, I'm an asshole for saying this. Yes, I'm comfortable with that.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
You aren't an asshole. We are all just ticked off that our team sucks right now. We just need to win the last two games.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
warhawk
16 years ago


If ever a year showed you win as a team and lose as a team it's this year for the Packers. How many games did Rodgers walk off the field late in the game with a lead only to stand on the sidelines and watch the defense piss it away?

"pack93z" wrote:



Curious, how many times did Rodgers lead a drive that would have put a cushion on the lead late in a game?

I haven't looked it up or tried to be cute.. I really wonder how many times Rodgers and this offense had an opportunity to seal away a victory with an additional score late.. instead of playing the we can't stop the routine on defense.

I don't pin the losses to Rodgers alone.. we as a team didn't pick each other up when the other segment failed. And neither the offense or the defense gave the other a margin of breathing room.. minus one game.. the Bears game. Neither unit ran hot together.. if the defense was on.. the offense struggled.. or vicey versey.. it never clicked.

I like the future of the Packers.. without a doubt, we have work to do and points of players games that need refining and growth.

As a board, we seem to think anytime a player is criticized that it is throwing them under the bus.. when in fact it is merely a acknowledgment of areas of the game in which it can be improved upon.

"warhawk" wrote:



Well, we averaged 26.5 points a game which I would think would be enough, don't you? Regardless of what drive they got them.
"The train is leaving the station."
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago
I would be curious to know if a team that has scored as much as the Packers have this season has ever had such a bad record in the history of the NFL.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (5h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (10h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (12h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (22h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (22h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (22h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8h / Random Babble / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.