Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Why are we talking about number of sacks? Woodson came nowhere close to leading the league in sacks when he won the award. I would guess the voters look at overall impact the player has on the field as opposed to purely a statistical measure.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Throw away the 9 interceptions he had then, right?





And it was supposed to be more gooder, not more better, d'oh!
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Jesus Christ, I didn't say that and you KNOW I didn't. You have a wonderful capacity for misconstruing people's words sometimes.
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Jesus Christ, I didn't say that and you KNOW I didn't. You have a wonderful capacity for misconstruing people's words sometimes.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



The latest discussion hovered around my claim that Clay is not a top 5 3-4 OLB. So naturally you'd compare the sacks because they are most accurate stat to measure players of that position.
This is a placeholder
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Of course you compare stats. But focusing on just sacks as a determinant of most valuable player, which is what some people seemed to be doing, makes no sense to me. A player could lead the league in sacks and not be the DPOY if, for example, he was a sack specialist who did little else. Whereas, like I said, Charles Woodson didn't lead the league in any one statistical category (other than TD returns), yet his overall impact was obvious to everyone. Similarly, even when he was injured, opposing defensive coordinators had to account for Matthews every game. That says a lot.
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Of course you compare stats. But focusing on just sacks as a determinant of most valuable player, which is what some people seemed to be doing, makes no sense to me. A player could lead the league in sacks and not be the DPOY if, for example, he was a sack specialist who did little else. Whereas, like I said, Charles Woodson didn't lead the league in any one statistical category (other than TD returns), yet his overall impact was obvious to everyone.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I said Wake is better than CM3 because he has more sacks and TfL than him, and Suggs is better because he's the best run stopping 3-4 OLB in the league. And I'm talking solely sacks here?
This is a placeholder
millertime
14 years ago
While you can debate how well CM3 matches up to past DPOY winners, you have to compare him to his competition from this season. (Polamolu, Wake, Harrison, Peppers, Revis)

For me, these awards must take into account a few things:
1. How well the team did.
2. The players stats.
3. What the team would be like if that player was gone.

With these in mind, I can't say that any other player deserved it more.

The Packers finished with a good record and a great defense (that removes Cameron Wake from the discussion).

If you look at stats alone. You can safely remove Harrison (10.5 sacks) and Peppers (8 sacks)from the ballot.

If you look at the value that the player had the team, The Steelers D allowed 14pts a game in the games that Polamolu played in and 12.5 in the 2 games he missed (granted 1 game was against the abysmal Panthers). Revis had down year, and the Jets D did not crumble in the games he missed (they won all 3, allowing an average of 22 pts.

When you look at Clay's importance to the Packers, it becomes more evident. He was injured early against Washington. The Packers lose that game by 3pts, the lose the next week against Miami by 3 pts, both games in overtime. The Packers D get 1 sack during the time that CM3 misses and, if anyone remembers those games, our pass rush was non-existent.

So basically, I can think of no player who deserves this award more than Clay. GO PACKERS!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Superb analysis. You expressed what I was trying to drive at, only far better than I possibly could have. +1
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Of course you compare stats. But focusing on just sacks as a determinant of most valuable player, which is what some people seemed to be doing, makes no sense to me. A player could lead the league in sacks and not be the DPOY if, for example, he was a sack specialist who did little else. Whereas, like I said, Charles Woodson didn't lead the league in any one statistical category (other than TD returns), yet his overall impact was obvious to everyone.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



I said Wake is better than CM3 because he has more sacks and TfL than him, and Suggs is better because he's the best run stopping 3-4 OLB in the league. And I'm talking solely sacks here?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



So Wake is better at getting sacks and Suggs is better at run stopping, but Clay is high in the discussion for both sacks and stopping the run. That makes me wonder if he's in the discussion for both, how is he not tops?
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Of course you compare stats. But focusing on just sacks as a determinant of most valuable player, which is what some people seemed to be doing, makes no sense to me. A player could lead the league in sacks and not be the DPOY if, for example, he was a sack specialist who did little else. Whereas, like I said, Charles Woodson didn't lead the league in any one statistical category (other than TD returns), yet his overall impact was obvious to everyone.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I said Wake is better than CM3 because he has more sacks and TfL than him, and Suggs is better because he's the best run stopping 3-4 OLB in the league. And I'm talking solely sacks here?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



So Wake is better at getting sacks and Suggs is better at run stopping, but Clay is high in the discussion for both sacks and stopping the run. That makes me wonder if he's in the discussion for both, how is he not tops?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Wake gets more sacks and more TfL than Matthews, so he is better at rushing the QB and run defense. Though Wake is not as good in run defense as his 12 TfL suggest (top 3 in the league), he is still very good.

Suggs is nearly as good a sacker as CM3, but much better in run defense.

I'm not saying CM3 is a LOT worse than them, I'm just saying that if I had to pick which player was better I'd edge toward Suggs or Wake. Maybe when CM3 has a chance to play a full season healthy he'll change my mind.

While millertime's post is very informative, this isn't defensive MVP, it's DPOY so I don't think a team's record has a lot to do with deciding the winner. It's like saying Rodgers wasn't good in '08 because our team was only 6-10.
This is a placeholder
peteralan71
14 years ago
I wonder why Ed Reed is not in the mix? 8 interceptions in 10 games played.... Seems to me that he should at least be in the discussion.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (7h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (7h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (12h) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (12h) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (13h) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (13h) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (13h) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (17h) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (17h) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

17h / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.