4PackGirl
14 years ago
i completely agree, porforis. i'm seriously lucky to be alive with the insane things i did as a teenager. and i'm a small town country girl who had a great upbringing with very loving parents. bottom line, i was gonna do what i wanted. they tried many times - talk after talk after talk - i STILL didn't listen.
4PackGirl
14 years ago


sorry zombie but i'm callin bullshit on this one. my parents talked to me about sex, were very strong in their morals, & told me to wait. but i didn't. it had NOTHING to do with their parenting skills. i'm a headstrong female - now it's a good thing - when i was a teen, not so much.

"DakotaT" wrote:



The possibilities for a response to this are endless. All I know is that I should have travelled through Iowa as a teenager.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



who lives in iowa?
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago


sorry zombie but i'm callin bullshit on this one. my parents talked to me about sex, were very strong in their morals, & told me to wait. but i didn't. it had NOTHING to do with their parenting skills. i'm a headstrong female - now it's a good thing - when i was a teen, not so much.

"DakotaT" wrote:



The possibilities for a response to this are endless. All I know is that I should have travelled through Iowa as a teenager.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



Whyever for? So you could have stayed celibate? Or investigated sex in a soybean field?


Now if you are saying you should have left Dakota, that I can see.

But go to Iowa? Yech.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
14 years ago
If you are a parent and your kid kills someone, it's your responsibility.

It's also your responsibility to teach your kids about sex. I was ready before I hit puberty. I had responsible sex in my teens. I still enjoy sex as an adult.

My fears about sex were STDs and pregnancies. I learned to take precaution for both, due to good parenting. I could have told you the difference between gonorrhoea and syphilis before I hit puberty. I also knew how to get condoms and how to get my gf the pill before I hit puberty. I was ready.

Sorry if I offend you here, but maybe my parents were better?

I don't believe in "wait." That's so freaking sexist because they don't tell boys to wait. Now, wait for the right person, sure. Wait until you get the STD results from the lab back, sure.

My son has already had sex, but for some weird reason, prefers videogames. That's my WTF parenting moment.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
14 years ago


Whyever for? So you could have stayed celibate? Or investigated sex in a soybean field?

"Wade" wrote:



Good one, but we're talking oats, not soybeans?

And Julie, I thought you were an Iowa girl?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
A couple questions regarding pre-18 sex.

1. If you had it to do over, would you have had less of it, more of it, or the same of it?

2. That which you had, do you regret having had?


I'd rather have a school of sexually active teenagers than a school of teenagers trying to deal with hormones while living the life of monks.


ISTM there are four objections that might be made to pre-18 sex, none of which justifies the law imposing age-based line.

Objection A: The religious one about idolatry. (The real reason for the adultery prohibition is that sex with a married person violates a covenant with God, and thus breaks the Great Commandment.) It's a valid argument (at least if you buy a certain kind of Christianity. But to the extent it is valid, it applies to everyone, not just to under 18s.

Objection B: Nonconsensual sex. The "what about rape or exploitation or ..." argument. Well, sure. But that's true whether the person is 14 or 54. Assault is assault. If you want to use "youth" as an factual argument for "unimformed consent" or some such, that's fine. But to say as a matter of law that just because someone is 14 or 16, they're presumptively less able to grant consent, that seems me as wholly unproven.

Objection C: The "kids are too young to bear that quantity of responsibility (e.g. for a kid of their own). Well, okay, I'll buy that. (Though the Admiral Farragut example would be a bit of contrary evidence for that claim.) But, funny thing is, you can have sex without it yielding kids.

And sex education isn't rocket science: Its "if you put this bit here, and you don't put that bit there, this little bit here is going to become a kid." And the economics of childrearing isn't that hard to get across either: here's how much a kid (you) cost me when you arrived (show bills, declining bank balance, etc.).

Objection 😨 STDs. Pretty easy education, too. "This is your penis. This is your penis on gonorrhea."
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Porforis
14 years ago

If you are a parent and your kid kills someone, it's your responsibility.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Wow blanket statements.

It's also your responsibility to teach your kids about sex. I was ready before I hit puberty. I had responsible sex in my teens. I still enjoy sex as an adult.

My fears about sex were STDs and pregnancies. I learned to take precaution for both, due to good parenting. I could have told you the difference between gonorrhoea and syphilis before I hit puberty. I also knew how to get condoms and how to get my gf the pill before I hit puberty. I was ready.

Sorry if I offend you here, but maybe my parents were better?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



You're taking your own experiences and life and applying it to the rest of the population. I'm sorry, but not everyone is exactly like you. I'm sorry if you can't understand that.

Also, let's assume for the moment that parents do have absolute 100% control over their children, and if the kids mess up it's always the parents' fault. Shouldn't you be arguing for amendments to the existing laws allowing for an exemption with parental consent? You know, since you're sort of arguing that kids aren't responsible for their own actions anyways? And you're protecting kids with shitty parents?

I don't believe in "wait." That's so freaking sexist because they don't tell boys to wait. Now, wait for the right person, sure. Wait until you get the STD results from the lab back, sure.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



They don't tell boys to wait? Huh? I thought we were talking about parenting and not boys snickering about nailing chicks in the hallways.
4PackGirl
14 years ago


Whyever for? So you could have stayed celibate? Or investigated sex in a soybean field?

"DakotaT" wrote:



Good one, but we're talking oats, not soybeans?

And Julie, I thought you were an Iowa girl?

"Wade" wrote:



nope - illinois baby!! 😉
zombieslayer
14 years ago

A couple questions regarding pre-18 sex.

1. If you had it to do over, would you have had less of it, more of it, or the same of it?

2. That which you had, do you regret having had?

"Wade" wrote:


1. More of it. There were a few girls who I should have had sex with but didn't. How could you not regret that? ;)

2. The only girl I regret having sex with was a Feminazi (I don't use that word lightly, she was the real deal) when I was in my early 20s. None in my teens and none later.

I'd rather have a school of sexually active teenagers than a school of teenagers trying to deal with hormones while living the life of monks.

"Wade" wrote:



I couldn't agree more.


ISTM there are four objections that might be made to pre-18 sex, none of which justifies the law imposing age-based line.

Objection A: The religious one about idolatry. (The real reason for the adultery prohibition is that sex with a married person violates a covenant with God, and thus breaks the Great Commandment.) It's a valid argument (at least if you buy a certain kind of Christianity. But to the extent it is valid, it applies to everyone, not just to under 18s.

Objection B: Nonconsensual sex. The "what about rape or exploitation or ..." argument. Well, sure. But that's true whether the person is 14 or 54. Assault is assault. If you want to use "youth" as an factual argument for "unimformed consent" or some such, that's fine. But to say as a matter of law that just because someone is 14 or 16, they're presumptively less able to grant consent, that seems me as wholly unproven.

Objection C: The "kids are too young to bear that quantity of responsibility (e.g. for a kid of their own). Well, okay, I'll buy that. (Though the Admiral Farragut example would be a bit of contrary evidence for that claim.) But, funny thing is, you can have sex without it yielding kids.

And sex education isn't rocket science: Its "if you put this bit here, and you don't put that bit there, this little bit here is going to become a kid." And the economics of childrearing isn't that hard to get across either: here's how much a kid (you) cost me when you arrived (show bills, declining bank balance, etc.).

Objection 😨 STDs. Pretty easy education, too. "This is your penis. This is your penis on gonorrhea."

"Wade" wrote:



A. I'll skip this one as it depends on your religion. With all due respect to people's religion here, this is between you and your God(s) or Goddess.

B. Obvious. Non-consensual sex should be prosecuted (as it already is).

C. Well said. But like I say, if your kid is biologically ready but not emotionally, mentally ready, then you failed as a parent. Contraceptives work when combined and applied properly. Like I said, bigger risk for teenagers is getting killed in a car crash.

D. Yes. That scared the hell out of me. Especially when I had a friend explain graphically how they cured it. Yikes. Made me wear condoms every time and only pick the "safer" sex partners.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
4PackGirl
14 years ago
i really don't know how to respond to you zombie. i didn't realize we were talking about 'responsible sex' vs 'irresponsible sex'. i thought we were simply discussing teen sex in general. i never said at any time that i had 'irresponsible' sex as a teen - just that i had 'sex' as a teen. for you to even suggest that your parents were somehow 'better' than mine when we were talking about two different things made me chuckle. that was quite an audacious remark to make but hey - it's your opinion & you're entitled to it - as am i.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Community Welcome! / lijog

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.