Formo
14 years ago

Actually, one could make a solid argument -- both from observation and from historical events -- that it is in fact women in the Western world who have historically been treated poorly, while women in the Islamic world have been and continue to be treated like queens. The fact that women in the Islamic world are not treated as we happen to treat women does not mean they are mistreated; it merely means they are treated differently.

A feminist scholar once said -- and I agree with her -- that she would believe in the ancient oppression of women when she found evidence of a female revolution. None exists. If women were truly treated as poorly as we, in our arrogant contempt of our ancestors, chauvinistically like to tell ourselves, they would have revolted, just as women in the West did indeed eventually revolt. The fact is, they never did. In fact, the mere idea was so ludicrous to thinkers of the time that it was a subject of comedy. The play Lysistrata ("Army-Disbander") by Aristophanes, for example, centers around the efforts of Lysistrata to lead a sex strike. Basically, the women tell their men that they will refuse to sleep with them until they stop fighting their foolish wars. Of course, the punchline of the play is that the movement fails spectacularly, because the women find their men so sexy that they can't resist them -- and to a woman, they all rush back into their husbands' arms.

Likewise, there has never been a women's revolt in any Islamic country, not even the ones we point to as being the most oppressive (Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.). The fact is that a lot of the practices we regard as "oppressive" are in fact promoted and enforced by the women themselves: veils, female circumcision (which the king of Saudi Arabia outlawed over the vociferous protests of his wives), etc. Indeed, in many Islamic countries, women are quite powerful: a recent vice-president of Iran was a woman, many women serve on the parliaments of both Iraq and Iran, and the list goes on. As one Saudi woman said to me, anyone who thinks Saudi women are oppressed has no clue how they live on a day-to-day basis. They get up when they want to, they go to the spa almost everyday, they get manicures and pedicures, they drive nice cars, they have maidservants, they don't have to work unless they want to, they have almost endless leisure.

In the early days of the Iraq war, it was not at all uncommon to see a woman walking unaccompanied down the streets of Baghdad in blue jeans. As the situation has deteriorated, however, they have been forced, for their own safety, to walk around in full niqab, accompanied at all times by men.

So I ask you, who has done the real oppression of women in that country?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



WTF does that have anything to do with the 'community center' in NYC?

Yes, I'm busting your balls Rourke. Deal with it.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Face it Formo, this thread has been off topic since at least page 3.
This is a placeholder
Formo
14 years ago

Face it Formo, this thread has been off topic since at least page 3.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Meh... Not really. There have been some sporatic posts off topic.. (someone's Ireland post, Zombie's response to that post... but he wrapped it up with the Muslim topic at the end).

I just like busting NSD's balls mostly, though.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
digsthepack
14 years ago
Nonstop...you overlook honor killings; the couple recently stoned (the death kind, not the fun kind) for marrying outside their parents wishes; the tribal nature of their culture that has different religious sects blowing the shit out of one another; the killing of innocents; hiding like cowards amongst their own people knowing that retaliation will inevitably kill more innocents; slavery; and so much more.

Look, every culture has some positives and negatives...the balance of which varies from one to the next. That said, if you are trying to suggest that all cultures are equal, it is complete tripe.
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

WTF does that have anything to do with the 'community center' in NYC?

"Formo" wrote:



It has no more to do with the community center than the statements by Zombieslayer and others that they don't like the way Muslims treat women.

Of course, the way Muslims treat women is far more a function of their individual cultures than it is of their religion. The Qur'an affords women protections that Western women can only dream of. For example, a man in the United States can unceremoniously dump a woman on her ass at any time. Not so under Islamic law. The Qur'an mandates that a man must wait a minimum of three months before finalizing a divorce, to ensure that she isn't pregnant. Then, if it turns out she is pregnant, he cannot divorce her for several months after she delivers. At that point, if he decides to go through with the divorce, he must not only provide for the child until it reaches adulthood, he must give his ex-wife an allowance as long as she lives (or, presumably, until she remarries).

The fact that some misogynistic cultures happen to embrace Islam does not mean that Islam is an misogynistic any more than does the fact that misogynistic cultures (e.g., Western Europe and America) embrace Christianity indicate that Christianity is a misogynistic religion.

In these debates, people frequently -- tragically, in my opinion -- conflate religion and culture. They aren't the same thing. People frequently fail to see how adaptable and flexible religion is. What Americans think of as "Christian morality" is hardly biblical at all. It is merely the justification of Greco-Roman/European preferences and biases with convenient Bible verses (while frequently ignoring many other inconvenient ones).

The Christianity and Judaism of the Bible far more resemble Islam than do their modern, European-influenced variants.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Nonstop...you overlook . . .

"digsthepack" wrote:



No, I overlook none of these things. Those are functions of individual, tribal-based cultures, which have adopted Islam and attempt to justify their practices with Islam in the same hypocritical way that many Westerners have attempted to justify various practices using Christianity.

Those practices you describe far predate Islam and they will probably survive Islam. Neither are they exclusive to Islamic cultures. Those same practices have existed in Christian cultures, not to mention Buddhist and Hindu cultures.

Cultures pick and choose from among their religions' teachings as they find it convenient. Muslims are just as guilty of this as are Christians, Hindus, and Jews. In order to make a sound argument on these issues, one must learn how to separate culture from religion.

An appropriate criticism of a cultural practice is not necessarily an indictment of the religious preference of that culture.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
14 years ago

Simply put, they have the RIGHT to build the mosque/outreach campus on the property they own. But, it is in very poor taste to do so....especially when the financiers are murky, and the main Imam is rather controversial, and an adherent of Sharia law. And, let us not overlook the fact that throughout history, Muslims HAVE built on/near the sites of their greatest victories. Whether you wish to admit it or not, there is vast symbolism for the Muslim people...particularly the terrorists amongst them....in the placement of this building.

My biggest gripe about the whole good Muslim/bad Muslim arguement...as simple as the analogy sounds....is the fact that they offer no significant input, or cooperation, in ridding the evil amongst themselves. To that end, I think they own some of the responsibility for problems that the darker elements of their faith practice.

"digsthepack" wrote:




This sounds like an argument straight out of the mouth of Sean Hannity. One of his main arguments is how they treat woman, which on the surface is fine. However, if what NSD says is true at all, then it would seem to make that argument invalid.

Hannitys other main argument is the Sharia law thing, which I honestly don't know much about. He talks about how 'they' want to bring Sharia law into the mainstream of America. I've yet to hear much proof of this fact other then some opinion he placed on an out of context quote. Any input on this?

And his third argument is the financial side of the building. However, if the company Hannity represents, Fox News, does in fact have serious financial ties and ownership by the same people, then Fox New's itself should not be allowed to operate . . . by his logic. I believe I posted a link to what I'm talking about earlier in this thread.

I'm just thankful to have access to many different sources of information.

As many have said, most aren't debating that this isn't in poor taste. However, where do we as a country draw the line? Should the government step in anytime something is in 'poor taste?' Just because the extreme amongst them might place some symbolic significance of its location is irrelevant. They can think that September 11th destroyed us as a country, etc. etc. all they want but that doesn't mean they are correct. Let them think what they want. The terrorist as we like to call them still don't have the upper hand, and won't, unless they win the war of ideals and fear, both of which are largely fueled by Americans.
4PackGirl
14 years ago
i don't see how the way a culture treats their women has anything to do with someone's right to build what they want, where they want it.

why is it ok that there's a strip club & otb near ground zero but it's not ok for a religious community center to be near there? perhaps i'm assuming too much but what are the chances in a 2 block area that someone of muslim faith doesn't own a business, apartment, etc near ground zero? should they be thrown out of the neighborhood as well?
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
If a bigot has opinion X and I share that opinion, am I a bigot?

I said it earlier in this thread, and I'll say it again. I think Cheesey errs here in his argument. If you will, he's "wrong".

But I don't think that makes his argument bigoted or him a bigot.

Committer of errors of logic and of inference. Yes.

But bigotry is more than error. Bigotry is moral failing. And that is as big a jump in logic as saying Islam is a terrorist religion based on the events of 9/11.

Just as there may be a confounding variable explaining why all those terrorist acts were committed (I tried to suggest that "age" and "maturity" might be confounding variables), so, too, there might be a confounding variable explaining why one of us holds to his/her position.

Not everyone who draws erroneous conclusions about "Muslim terrorists" is bigoted. And not all of those erroneous conclusions indicate bigotry.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Someone mentioned Fox News?

[youtube]35eRxxZ-Ar0[/youtube]
This is a placeholder
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (6h) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
    Zero2Cool (6h) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
    dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
    dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
    wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
    Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
    dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
    Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
    Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
    Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
    beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
    Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
    Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
    dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
    Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
    dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
    dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
    dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
    Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
    Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
    wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
    Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
    Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
    Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
    Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
    Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
    Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
    Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

    14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

    13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

    12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.