Tezzy
14 years ago

It's not about 'gaining yards' actually. It's about gaining FIRST downs and TOUCH downs.

And how much of his 'precious yards' were during junk time when the game was over?

#2 in rushing yards but #1 in running into his own players, going down when looked at, and #1 at pissing me off! RABBLE!

Don't get me started on him!

"tromadz" wrote:



Getting you started on him makes it feel like football is here again.

Ok, so lets look at last years performers in the 2009 season. Sorry Trom, they still don't document the number of times running into back of lineman.

NFL Rushing Stats 2009 

All I have to say is that there are very few RBs in the entire league that I would even consider for removing Grant. The stat lines here show it, and marks upon a lot of the topics. Grant was 4th in 1st downs, and 5th in TDs, and the only RB in the top 10 without a fumble, all while being 7th in number of carries.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Pack93z
14 years ago

It's not about 'gaining yards' actually. It's about gaining FIRST downs and TOUCH downs.

And how much of his 'precious yards' were during junk time when the game was over?

#2 in rushing yards but #1 in running into his own players, going down when looked at, and #1 at pissing me off! RABBLE!

Don't get me started on him!

"Tezzy" wrote:



Getting you started on him makes it feel like football is here again.

Ok, so lets look at last years performers in the 2009 season. Sorry Trom, they still don't document the number of times running into back of lineman.

NFL Rushing Stats 2009 

All I have to say is that there are very few RBs in the entire league that I would even consider for removing Grant. The stat lines here show it, and marks upon a lot of the topics. Grant was 4th in 1st downs, and 5th in TDs, and the only RB in the top 10 without a fumble, all while being 7th in number of carries.

"tromadz" wrote:



Don't throw facts at a Trom rant.. Grant is on Trom List of players he loathes.. guys that make Trom A list include the likes of Colledge. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
dfosterf
14 years ago
He can rant, but he can't have both. (Grant AND Colledge) :danceme:

Friggin' Colledge should be hung before he is shot.

We couldn't even run at the left side.

Go look it up, stats-wise. Even when we (stubbornly/ had to) tried to---

complete fail.

How did Ryan get his yards, then?

We were pretty good running to the right side.

Actually, the best in the NFL.

THAT tells you how much Colledge and the other salary crooks SUCKED on that left side.
porky88
14 years ago
Grant is a good back, but Peterson is great. I think the best talent of his generation by far. One of the best freshman college football players in history, if not the best. Fumbles aside, Minnesota won the division the last two years with Adrian Peterson.

Would they have won it with Ryan Grant?

Flip the two guys. How good is Adrian Peterson in Green Bay and how good is Ryan Grant in Minnesota?

Personally, I think Green Bay dominates the Vikings the last two years if the roles are reversed. This isn't a knock on Grant, but rather praise for Peterson, who Packer fans loathe because he's great. Same reason why Bear fans loathe Brett Favre and now Aaron Rodgers.

On this one, I don't see how it's even a debate. Peterson is a game changer and someone you gameplan to beat. Grant is good, but let's not combine the good and the great.
djcubez
14 years ago
I used to hate Grant. I've pretty much done a complete 180. I just feel like we've needed a change of pace back from him for a while. A speedy, flashy guy. Grant gets the job done and goes for the dirty work yards. We need someone that can catch balls out of the backfield and make something out of it.
earthquake
14 years ago

It's not about 'gaining yards' actually. It's about gaining FIRST downs and TOUCH downs.

And how much of his 'precious yards' were during junk time when the game was over?

#2 in rushing yards but #1 in running into his own players, going down when looked at, and #1 at pissing me off! RABBLE!

Don't get me started on him!

"tromadz" wrote:



#7 overall in rushing TDs
#5 overall in first downs

Only one guy who made more first downs than him had a better first down %, and that was AP. Every single guy who had more first downs also had at least 30 more carries

Not sure what guy you were watching that didn't score TDs or get first downs.

I think really the only big negative is he didn't get a lot of big runs, but honestly, if you're not breaking lots of big gains and still manage to put up a 4.4 average, you're a very productive and consistent back.

Look at it this way:
AP
4.4 average
12 runs over 20
3 runs over 40

Grant
4.4 average
8 runs over 20
2 runs over 40

If you look at those stats, who would you guess is the guy running into his oline or getting stuffed at the line more often?

And even the "doesnt break many big ones" thing barely holds water.
Tied for #11 with 8 runs over 20, which is above-average at worst. 8 only looks bad if you're comparing him to Chris Johnson at 22, AP who was #2 on the list only had 12.

I think we have a habit as packer fans to unjustifiably over-analyze grant. I guess we feel he could have even better production... But its really hard to say Grant had anything but a top 10 season in 2009.


Edit: Just saw tezzy's post, my numbers are a little different but we agree on the point! from nfl.com's stats.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&seasonType=REG&d-447263-o=2&conference=null&statisticCategory=RUSHING&d-447263-s=RUSHING_FIRST_DOWNS&experience=null&d-447263-n=1&season=2009&qualified=true&Submit=Go&tabSeq=0&d-447263-p=1 
blank
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
The fact Grant doesn't get lots of long break away runs like AP is a great thing... No, stop laughing, I am serious. AP gets lots of break away runs and averaged 4.4 per carry. Grant got few breakaway runs and also had a 4.4 average. That means Grant gets clock eating first down producing consistent yardage. AP may get a couple 20 yard runs and a 40 then the rest of it is a bunch of very short runs. Contributing to lots of 3 and outs.

The best example is the difference between Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith. Barry could be held to no yards for a half and end the game with 120 yards. That mean lots of 3 and outs resulting in punts. Emmitt would wait for his line to get him 3 yards then fall down for 2 more. The result was consistent clock eating first down producing drives. Emmitt couldn't carry Barrys jock with 2 hand and a shoulder strap. Who got more rings?

The best thing 1250 yards per fumble compared to 200 yards per fumble.
Sure, Grant doesn't get break away runs and AP does, Grant gets consistent positive yards and at the end of the play, it's still our ball.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
earthquake
14 years ago
That Smith/Sanders comparison is very good Dexter, i think that is something people overlook far too often, they just want a flashy guy and dont think about time of possession, ball control or sustaining drives.
blank
tromadz
14 years ago

And how much of his 'precious yards' were during junk time when the game was over?

"Greg C." wrote:



Most RB's get a lot of yards in "junk time" when the game is over. That's part of their job: killing the clock and putting teams away. We have an RB who can do this, and now it's being counted as a negative.

And God forbid if, as Packer Traxx speculates, Grant broke off a 20-yard run during the Arizona game that inflated his YPC. We wouldn't want THAT to happen now would we? One of the biggest (and most legitimate) criticisms of Grant is that he does not make enough long gains, but if he does get one some fans will use that against him by saying that it inflated his YPC.

Let's face it: Grant is a very good RB. Not a superstar, but easily good enough to be part of a championship offense.

"tromadz" wrote:



Sorry I want my running back to get yards when the game is close and we NEED them, not when the game is over(either blowing out opps or being blown out).

Who said I didn't want him to break off long runs? Nobody? Okay.

"Grant is a very good RB." - Agree to disagree on that one. Very good running backs don't get arm tackled every time. They don't run into their own linemen so much it becomes his 'thing.' A good RB can block. And I swear to christ if someone argues he's a good blocker I'm gonna lose it.

Agree to disagree. You know who is a better running back than Ryan Grant? Every other running back on our roster.

How many times in gameday chats does everybody predict a gain of 1 on 1st down runs? It almost always happens! But it's McCarthys\Olines\TTs\Bigfoot's fault.

He's not good. I hope he BECOMES good. I hope he has a pro bowl year and people come back to this thread and go "See, tromadz, ya dummy!!

I'm all for that. Won't happen though. Luckily we have a great passing attack and defense. Our running back is average at best though.

Okay, now go on about how I hope he averages 20 yards a game or something I didn't say.
IronMan
14 years ago
Tromadz hates Ryan Grant, and puppies.
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (3h) : Ironically, our QB played the best of all 3
    beast (10h) : 0-3 NFC North Dominated the Regular season and shutout in the post season
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Burn Detroit to the ground over losing to the Commanders? Bit extreme
    packerfanoutwest (12h) : Burn your city Lion fans!!
    packerfanoutwest (12h) : suck it lions!!!
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Knew that playoffs loss for the Lions would hit like crack but I could absolutely OD on this
    TheKanataThrilla (12h) : Gonna sleep better after that game
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : goodnight!
    Martha Careful (12h) : goodnight
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : (not you Martha, it's a saying lol)
    Martha Careful (12h) : America loves an underdog
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : That'll do pig, that'll do
    Martha Careful (12h) : 4 turnovers by Goff
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : that INT was definately on Goff!
    Martha Careful (12h) : we arent the only guys who blow contain
    Martha Careful (12h) : it should be 4th down
    Martha Careful (12h) : I can't blame the call, Ijust would have gone for it
    Martha Careful (12h) : miss
    TheKanataThrilla (12h) : I had the feeling he was gonna miss
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : The football gods chortled
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Absolutely! Rip their heart out a la The Temple of Doom!
    Martha Careful (12h) : a first down wins the game
    Martha Careful (12h) : do you go for FG on 4th?
    Martha Careful (12h) : 3 guys open
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Go for the TUD! Want a 50 bomb especially after how Detroit constantly ran up the score this year
    Martha Careful (12h) : bad play called against blitz
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : another clutch throw!
    TheKanataThrilla (12h) : Daniels is spectacular!!!!
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Washington uses a time out?
    Martha Careful (13h) : I hate it when owners are on the field
    Martha Careful (13h) : great game
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Detroit not officially dead but the Fat Lady is warming up
    Martha Careful (13h) : more people should spike it
    TheKanataThrilla (13h) : I still don't feel good yet. Ghost of bad Washington team past I guess
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Probably is
    Martha Careful (13h) : Campbell looks like he is crying
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : I could REALLY use another Pick 6 right now
    TheKanataThrilla (13h) : 3 score lead and their D can't stop you
    Martha Careful (13h) : and that play FB screwed up
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : DAGGER!!!!!!!
    Martha Careful (13h) : wow!!! 4th down mesh pass
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : except for that goofy 4th down play to Mariota in the 1st Washington has been on fire with there play calls
    TheKanataThrilla (13h) : 4th down killer again
    Martha Careful (13h) : Kliff Kingsbury stock is rising
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Detroit crumbling right now
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : yeah like i said, i thought it was goff but just got too excited at the Lions misfortune
    Martha Careful (13h) : they need 6.. only up 10
    Martha Careful (13h) : I think the receicer threw that
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Speaks volumes that they don't trust Goff there though
    TheKanataThrilla (13h) : So glad that Chicago didn't draft Daniels
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    4h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    15-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.