all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

Not exactly a slam on the kid, but not a ringing endorsement either. We knew out of the draft the kid was a punishing blocker who needs to brush up on his all around FB skills.

Mike McCarthy then says Quinn looks good. Good, not bad. Good. Mike McCarthy also makes an excellent point, Quinn is a thumper --- which is hard to evaluate without pads on. Hardly a slight on Quinn there.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




I think we're interpreting his comments different - which for the record is fine. I took the "he needs to line" to mean that he is in his second year and hasn't stood out yet. MM emphasizes so much on player progression from year 1 to year 2, so I took it as odd as McCarthy not saying "He has made a jump" as he has indicated with players like Underwood.

As for the "looking good" comment; I've realized MM rarely comes out and criticizes players. FFS, he said the same thing about Allen Barbre... I was sort of reading between the lines, but when you do that there is no guarantee that you get at what person's true inner thoughts all the time.


I guess my main issue is that people are seemingly thinking Johnson has one spot locked up, and the other two players will battle for the remaining one... That's not accurate at all. A simple breakdown of snaps shows that Kuhn played 247 snaps on offense, Johnson played 137, and Hall came in third at 118. Hall also missed 5-6 weeks with an injury. If anything, you'd assume based off those numbers that Hall and Johnson would be competing for the second FB spot.

But my point is that it's pretty silly to anoint Johnson as having one of the two spots locked up, and thinking it'll be up to Kuhn and Hall to compete for the other one.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
bozz_2006
14 years ago
I think one thing to note is that Hall and Kuhn basically bring similar skill sets, don't they? If Johnson brings something a little different, it may very well be between Hall and Kuhn.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

I think one thing to note is that Hall and Kuhn basically bring similar skill sets, don't they? If Johnson brings something a little different, it may very well be between Hall and Kuhn.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



That is a great point you make, and I'd agree with you that Hall and Kuhn bring similar skill sets.

But the thing is, in my opinion, those skill sets fit our team very nicely. Neither is going to be mistaken for all-pro blockers, but they do it pretty well. Neither will be splitting out wide as WRs, but both have shown themselves to be decent at receiving, and Rodgers has confidence in them to throw them the ball should plays break down. Put differently, they are decent last resort check-down options.

But when I say the fit in well with our offensive system, their physical skill set fits our zone scheme very nicely. In the zone scheme, outside of cutting D-linemen, you want some blockers on the second level. Hall and Kuhn have the quickness to get to that second level and occupy blockers. Quinn Johnson does not. Outside of short-yardage situations and goal-line situations, Johnson doesn't offer a heck of a whole lot to you. Arguably though, Kuhn offers just as much as Johnson if not more in goal-line situations, what with his ability to block decently, sneak out and catch-passes, or run the ball in (as we've seen, MM likes to hand-off to Kuhn in goal-line situations).

So while Kuhn and Hall bring similar skill-sets, I think they fit pretty darn well with our system. Much more so than Quinn Johnson's skill set. I still think it'll be a three-man competition, with the best two staying on. Kuhn might have a jump on one of the spots based on my thinking above, but I don't think anyone can say with any confidence that any of the players has a lock on any one roster spot. Which many imply, based on the "Hall or Kuhn stay" line of reasoning.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
beast
14 years ago

I don't really have any faith in Havner. I don't see him being a threat to opposing defenses (they can just throw a LB on him).

"go.pack.go." wrote:



I agree when a defense is playing man to man it has been easy for teams to just cover Havner up.

BUT when a defense is playing zone Havner finds the hole and gets open and once he gets the ball, he's very good at playing avoid the defenders game zig zagging he's way to TDs...

4 TDs in 7 catches... I'm not sure why defenders lose him in zone but as long as he keeps scoring for the Packers it's good :thumbright:

That's kind of why I want to keep 4 TEs for this year.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago

Reported at the beginning of summer :
Whispers 

Our sources in Green Bay would not be shocked if the team released a sizable number of familiar veterans this offseason. Included on the list of potential casualties is eighth-year TE Donald Lee, who is now looking up at Jermichael Finley on the depth chart; sixth-year LB Brady Poppinga, whose pass-rush shortcomings could prove to be his undoing; fifth-year CB-S Jarrett Bush; and fourth-year OT Allen Barbre. We also hear it's almost a given that one of the team's three fullbacks (John Kuhn, Korey Hall or Quinn Johnson) will be sent packing.

"68md" wrote:




Does this all hold true or have things changed here at the end of summer ?



most of us already knew that these guys could get ousted already ... but as far as lee and pop I have a feeling we keep them even thou their production is lacking.

like other posters already said - we do we have to replace pop as a backup? and lee is better then err cant spell his name (the new guy).
although I could do without seeing the ball thrown to lee in the endzone (did he drop it 2x last year in the endzone?)
viks game and?
porky88
14 years ago

Pop on the game against San Francisco. Quinn Johnson made some outstanding lead blocks for Ryan Grant. During that game, I saw some of the best blocking by a Green Bay FB since William Henderson IMO.

Also, he really is just a one dimensional player. He's a lead blocker. That's kind of it. He's not going to stand out unless the pads are on and there is hitting.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:




That's the thing though, you see some good stuff but when you watch game film you see Quinn Johnson is pretty damn slow. Outside of thumping people, he doesn't do much.

He's not offering you much in the passing game as a FB-receiver option or much in the run game as a short yardage back option. With our offensive system, you'd like some agile and versatile players. Johnson, simply put, isn't that versatile. Khun and Hall, on the other hand, actually are more-so than him.

"porky88" wrote:



Well yeah and that's something the Packers are going to have to decide. Do you want versatility? Personally, I want a thumper as a FB. I feel like a lead blocker is more important to the team than a pass catcher out of the backfield. I make life as easy for Ryan Grant as possible.

I've said this before, but just because everyone says Jarrett Bush is a good special teams player, doesn't mean he actually is. When is the last time you can remember Jarrett Bush making a good play on special teams? Exactly.

Similar to how everyone says Brett Favre is a clutch qb. Actually , he sucks when the game is on the line. Great regular season qb. Playoffs/when the game is on the line, not so much. As much as he's choked in these situations, it doesn't stop people from saying, "Brett Favre is the guy I want on my team when its clutch time."

And with Bush, it doesn't matter how many bone headed plays/penalties he makes on ST, people will still say that he is a ST ace. I don't get it.

That said, I don't think Jarrett Bush gets cut. He has an unofficial lifetime contract with the Packers it seems.

"IronMan" wrote:



There is much more to special teams play than racking up tackles. Are you disciplined? Are you in the right position? Bush is all those things. I wouldn't call him a league wide special teams ace, but as far as the Packers are concerned, he's one of the better special teams players on the team, which helps his cause.

Will Blackmon has shown potential to be more than just a return man. If he's healthy, he could knock Bush out. I think that's a tidbit worth watching.
earthquake
14 years ago
I honestly dont think we need someone who is a receiving threat and all these other things as a lead-blocking fullback. With our FB(Hall or Kuhn) and TE's, we have enough of those sort of "tweener" guys that can do some blocking and do some catching. Johnson was drafted for a reason, and that is to lay people the F out.... Is that enough to stay on the roster? Well, it was enough for them to use a draft pick on the guy, so there must be some people who think so.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

But my point is that it's pretty silly to anoint Johnson as having one of the two spots locked up, and thinking it'll be up to Kuhn and Hall to compete for the other one.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



No sir, I do not think he has one 'locked up'. I do however think his play will lock one up for him though. I think he'll prove to be a punishing blocker. I tried finding it, but failed, although Ryan Grant said he likes it when Quinn is in front of him. I don't recall him saying something similar about Kuhn or Hall. So, it may have been just one of those 'ill throw in a good word' type of comments.
UserPostedImage
Bigbyfan
14 years ago
I think Hall is the odd man out in the FB battle. The main reason is availibilty. I may be wrong, but it seems Hall has been consistently injured the past couple seasons.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago

I got a little worried when I saw the title of this thread, then I started to calm down after I saw the names.

"go.pack.go." wrote:


My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (5h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (10h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (17h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (18h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (18h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (18h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (19h) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

12h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.