Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I fail to understand the issue with it.. I as a heterosexual male have attended gentleman's clubs in my youth.. been attracted to the talent and felt no urge to act upon that attraction.. I would guess it may be the same in nature in the locker room.

"pack93z" wrote:



And a grown man can hop in a hot tub with a minor and feel no urge as well. Not that I'd suggest it, lol.
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

Bathsheba? Or God.. Does God count as a person?

EDIT: Jonathan. King David is quoted as saying one of the quotes that Shawn posts, "I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me; THY LOVE TO ME WAS WONDERFUL, PASSING THE LOVE OF WOMEN."

News flash.. A man can love another man in ways he can't love a woman.. but that does not mean he is homosexual.

Psalms 133 also mentions in it's first verse "Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!" I honestly think both of those scriptures make a great statement on how having a fellowship of 'brethren', rather than anything being homosexual, is important in the lifes of Christians.

"pack93z" wrote:



To your news flash.. of course.. but the point is the translation is vague at best and contradicting. Which is exactly why I take offense to thumping people openly with verse and condemning them.. we as human don't have an open channel to God himself to ask "exactly" what was meant and was interperted by man.

Why do we.. as human feel the need to pass judgment upon an equal based on our potentially biased understanding of God's word?

Based upon Christian faith.. every human has their judgment day.. and that day is not of human judgment.. yet we feel the need to judge here on earth.

The tools (bible/good book/word of Lord) are available for each human.. they are readily available in all faiths and languages.. open for each to read, understand and make their choices upon.. I fail to see why we feel the need to judge.

Telling someone they are wrong based on the gray vague and contradicted passages in the bible seems to me as the wrong act.

"Formo" wrote:



Eh, I'm not passing judgement. I never came out and told someone how much they were going to Hell because of their sexual lifestyle.. because frankly I don't know where they're going when they die. I really only try to control things I can control and help others when asked. In extreme cases I'll intervene with my thoughts. But judgement? Naw. Funny how a lot of insecure people in my life has for some reason felt like I were judging them just because I became a Christian. Just because I disagree with someone's lifestyle choices doesn't mean I'm judging them. It just means I disagree.

As for why I feel it's wrong biblicly is simply a matter of how many times I've seen passages that talk about a man and a woman versus man and man. Even before I became a Christian I thought it was wrong because of the obvious:
UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
14 years ago
Formo.. sorry if it seemed I was flagging you.. not by intent... just the whole a homosexual shouldn't be in the military based on the bible verse.

Another reason to defeat such an Ideal.. is the whole church separate from the state debate.. lol.

Yet another point of that the bible in this discussion, the original topic shouldn't be used. Can't use the bible as reference in one aspect yet deny it in others.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Trippster
14 years ago
How would you feel having to dress in the locker rooms with women? Why do we have seperate locker/bath rooms for men and women? Shouldn't that also apply to gays? why/why not?

I don't know but if Jennifer Aniston was in a foxhole with me I might be just a tad distracted from trying to keep my head from getting blown off.
"Let Your Light Shine!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

How would you feel having to dress in the locker rooms with women? Why do we have seperate locker/bath rooms for men and women? Shouldn't that also apply to gays? why/why not?

I don't know but if Jennifer Aniston was in a foxhole with me I might be just a tad distracted from trying to keep my head from getting blown off.

"Trippster" wrote:



Are we talking Jennifer Aniston, now or 10 years ago? It makes a difference.


I wouldn't mind changing in front of women or taking a dump with'em either. Heck, maybe restrooms would smell better and be cleaner then. Oh, if the seat was left up, holy shit RUN!!

People are people, white, black, male, female, blind, deaf, smart, not smart, whatever ... who cares?




I've been around a few gay folk's and worked with some too. I think it's no problem. At my last job, this guy Travis was flaming and proud. He was funny as heck too. I would act foolish in front of him, bending over slowly and saying 'ya like that huh'. The hypocritical thing about it is, I wouldn't have done that to a woman, but with him ... no big deal.


Edit, oh about being distracted by whomever is next to you. If you're a soldier, it shouldn't matter. Soldiers are human and susceptible to human nature, sure, but bottom line, you're a soldier, your duty comes first.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

How would you feel having to dress in the locker rooms with women? Why do we have seperate locker/bath rooms for men and women? Shouldn't that also apply to gays? why/why not?

I don't know but if Jennifer Aniston was in a foxhole with me I might be just a tad distracted from trying to keep my head from getting blown off.

"Trippster" wrote:



You have clearly never been in a foxhole.

There are many situations in life in which nudity occurs that should not provoke sexual arousal. As far as I'm concerned, if such situations do provoke such a response in you, that is a personal issue that indicates you should avoid placing yourself in such situations. For example, I work in the medical field. As part of my duties, I have had to see many people -- male and female -- naked. Never have I been the least bit turned on while performing these tasks, even while performing genital exams or inserting Foley (urinary) catheters. I have heard reports, however, of OB-GYNs getting a little frisky while doing examinations. That indicates they are in the wrong profession. Similarly, I would not get turned on by seeing women in locker rooms, or, for that matter, bathrooms. Anyone who would should recuse himself from those areas. Likewise, anyone who would walk around with an erection in a Roman bath or European sauna doesn't belong in one.

The same principle applies to homosexuals. Any gay man (or woman) who would find himself inappropriately aroused in a shower facility or foxhole does not belong in the military. Call me idealistic, but just as few straights are prone to getting randy in the field (though there are always the bizarre few who fuck in the port-a-potties), I doubt that after several days without showers, all that many gays are burning to dip their dicks in the filthy, sweaty ass that surrounds them.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

How would you feel having to dress in the locker rooms with women?

"Trippster" wrote:



That would rule! :downtown:
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Dammit. I just read NSD's post then remembered, yeah, I grew up a nudist. Actually it wouldn't rule. It's kind of normal and normal is boring.

Never mind.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
  • Formo
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

Formo.. sorry if it seemed I was flagging you.. not by intent... just the whole a homosexual shouldn't be in the military based on the bible verse.

Another reason to defeat such an Ideal.. is the whole church separate from the state debate.. lol.

Yet another point of that the bible in this discussion, the original topic shouldn't be used. Can't use the bible as reference in one aspect yet deny it in others.

"pack93z" wrote:



No no.. I didn't take it as you were singling me out.. I just was honestly confused by one of your statements because I didn't see any of the actions you saw in the thread, that's all. I never felt like I had to defend myself or my beliefs in this thread at all, which honestly is a huge breath of fresh air. I have to defend myself a TON when I'm pit against some of my atheist friends.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Not only is it normal, Zombieslayer, it's also situational. When my wife and I are in an amorous mood, her nudity turns me on. But just seeing her walk about the house naked (say, while cleaning) doesn't give me a hardon. Neither does seeing her nude in the shower. Viewing her nude body in the labor and delivery room wouldn't do it for me either. It's the same reason why pornography doesn't turn me on -- unless I'm getting some myself, I don't find nudity arousing.

In the end, it's the heart, mind and soul I want to make love to. The body is secondary. It all feels the same in the dark.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (13h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (21h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.